From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E07EA0A0F for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 16:02:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37D8A4068F; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 16:02:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C720E40147 for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 16:02:39 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1622815358; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xYPyOHBRSnTetzYk2q+GWcLwKHJk3KU1Do2NOTppYoI=; b=PXCO1P1EquISLEGac6MIkUThtdd77fYb5baFa9GYM8bN6MX5LHINxDQrU/Egz32GX66K/Z 6UzrMwkWs1i2qi8M+zxOAG+7gcTNzck5pe2mByagiinWy7BuofMX2E+xCzs17KWRiftmn/ dbZy/wucVaG6XSNKqx/j1u3nh6fM5pk= Received: from mail-ua1-f72.google.com (mail-ua1-f72.google.com [209.85.222.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-183-yq8F7Q8FPrSy1qGNGlsRmA-1; Fri, 04 Jun 2021 10:02:25 -0400 X-MC-Unique: yq8F7Q8FPrSy1qGNGlsRmA-1 Received: by mail-ua1-f72.google.com with SMTP id x11-20020a9f2f0b0000b029020331a0ba74so4122495uaj.15 for ; Fri, 04 Jun 2021 07:02:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xYPyOHBRSnTetzYk2q+GWcLwKHJk3KU1Do2NOTppYoI=; b=DynYvMo57A7NzAncVOEVGh5RGOyGmXEXCRxQcDbFYdT6aNGxWAuYZQnVs7691+r1RL pZYQUmwbijkMMe2NM6Mfv2JmJWOlEqmYr6X+JOATZ+fl9FzLaH6ztFTU7no3r7ftqh5s Hx1+SMynRb1SZuyA+vV8Ke/Pckpj7CbcnTMFoKJ4WR5szYjBKxcCkTrd4/tPoLsdaSsc dQLn0f6gsnwCDNFnKkGlT3upNn1o+PwJXc2W1aj7KaDTMp5OauskUJnwtPJkm+AUUdK6 Fk3a1d7M1FxOfVZEOmtn6mnt5e0VsXa9nb7UmEitz9DfZ+lp12IeCD/xHJzN//yjyukn pRMw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533hHs0umtP4TqrJ72HuE3jsSG1JU3haHwPSk2guA7Gs4azJqcYZ u8Wx5xS0wUL58Iq1fOGkceimlr5HITIwshJHbdTk4ot89V9ILdKZnxRaHxH/tpYuwxCkuoO3tHK csNRNymisyIPisp/73Q== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:67a:: with SMTP id z26mr2722920vsf.10.1622815344656; Fri, 04 Jun 2021 07:02:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyO02WcCalmy99hnQPNJZea9HaLz8ONmlFrYIzkRFIoeNr6eR3YDH2qkuCzONRuBUarvIoDl6Ec1u9tKTMipAs= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:67a:: with SMTP id z26mr2722890vsf.10.1622815344449; Fri, 04 Jun 2021 07:02:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2021 16:02:13 +0200 Message-ID: To: Lincoln Lavoie Cc: dpdklab , ci@dpdk.org, Aaron Conole , Thomas Monjalon , Ray Kinsella Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdklab] ABI test failing for openSUSE and Arch Linux X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 3:53 PM Lincoln Lavoie wrote: > > All, > > The ABI references for all systems were updated this week to the 21.05 re= lease code. The two failures look like places where the interfaces didn't = actually change. We do see the failures across multiple patches, which migh= t imply something got merged that caused these changes / failures. I checked ABI for 64307fad7d2b ("telemetry: remove static limit on callbacks count") against v21.05, yesterday. There is no issue. The report I mentioned https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/17309/ is for a patch added on top of 64307fad7d2b. And the patch for this patchset won't break ABI. Can you confirm the ABI check runs fine against the main repo? I can't find a report for it in lab.dpdk.org. https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/tarballs/ --=20 David Marchand