From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 371C2A0524 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 11:08:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 283E5160D19; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 11:08:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1961160D06 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 11:08:02 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1618304882; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=OZIw2bTLiEKZwAe8lSoS1lQeZqGsP6Sh9JAXPsU3+VU=; b=gwH7jnDWQI7qGD4E72tPyKqwF5oBiXAEfVUr40bQ45pOS5lFgUlfelBbQ0K1F8rhQHKP+r yA0rd61HGTZxI5zlvxybVpRQ76cvhJTRPXsEvuLUfrf/Rqs0g9R+GBQP1NO2lENolS3I5X oX5bXeAcNQ2GIJg+G9DiRMaUQjbpCaM= Received: from mail-vs1-f72.google.com (mail-vs1-f72.google.com [209.85.217.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-446-cB7_03v3Mv-hMLoqq07Ilg-1; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 05:08:00 -0400 X-MC-Unique: cB7_03v3Mv-hMLoqq07Ilg-1 Received: by mail-vs1-f72.google.com with SMTP id a24-20020a67ca980000b02902078c4153f6so895191vsl.16 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 02:08:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=OZIw2bTLiEKZwAe8lSoS1lQeZqGsP6Sh9JAXPsU3+VU=; b=H4lnSkpkTgLV88yG9S2mBZxZ6o7zWoIurzJ5B88k6uC+Yo7g+BTEB+uzF2z10XGXMp n94aItmC9hVNvoSQbzwV7TmE8eCciAAdZKvJ7xhxxmKGz5Ywu2OtMSiQtXiZw4/8rvtZ zOhhrTsuJJwnqxqhNKGdXj3JX/zBeaSmXAQaNvNYewGPItBHRmSrI1NcZREDH3xhdHvL /PbwMNev8r8ZR6PiFUbiqdnZb4NXX3/WFZStarlKDMUXO/pIIeJajVb7IsdCXV4WXcXd aXANyZSWpAPfmLCi1DdoewelCjkcO1VHG+8+XRkaDxbimGgL32da+Bm7MVnmH/fpWUnS eg+Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530AFPinALIn1oufXnlfTXzgiTR4DAn1BZOYB6b4SDRGaAjHFwM+ AClO8xpqcnvi3dFvOFV6EOmy2lt9vwg5mfxO8slPOm4LPJ8BDUZ1bc7ZMVVtBiiKjsZM4B/z7JP po7cSzaGIterkviDezg== X-Received: by 2002:a67:87c1:: with SMTP id j184mr5430242vsd.18.1618304880492; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 02:08:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwhZ7Fxx14pM5tBEl+Vh5SUBsZJJAt+DunYeNo3PjEOhSDTCiGZMMtqqNMu8dLhG5jU2CaZyUjgyfam7BYAz+0= X-Received: by 2002:a67:87c1:: with SMTP id j184mr5430232vsd.18.1618304880334; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 02:08:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <3565653.Ar8n8QqFrN@thomas> In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 11:07:49 +0200 Message-ID: To: Jerin Jacob Cc: Thomas Monjalon , Timothy McDaniel , Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran , Ray Kinsella , Aaron Conole , dpdklab , "abhinandan.gujjar@intel.com" , "harry.van.haaren@intel.com" , dev , Shijith Thotton , Akhil Goyal , Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula , "mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com" , ci@dpdk.org Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-dev] [pull-request] dpdk-next-net-eventdev - 21.05 - PRE-RC1 X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 10:55 AM Jerin Jacob wrote: > I was running the following script[1] to detect ABI issues. > Since the "./devtools/test-meson-builds.sh" did not return non zero value or > the error print was "Error: cannot find librte_event_dlb.dump", It is > missed from my side. > > @David Marchand @Thomas Monjalon Could you share the snippet you are > using for detecting the ABI issue. > > > ------------------------ > # ABI check > DPDK_ABI_REF_VERSION=v20.11 DPDK_ABI_REF_DIR=/tmp bash Ah ok, this is because event/dlb did not exist in 20.11. Running against 21.02, you should get the error. -- David Marchand