From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27BB3A0C51 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 10:02:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C2024067C; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 10:02:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCB664003C for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 10:02:15 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1623312135; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=bbLNEgcUOwVh8SZG9LazBkIiHPS74QOjKJiOLWh8tjE=; b=bPFc6DnerSv7AQvtDVmztdwnhIXn8PUOtvDNrbeBk6XrzyewzRWiZ4Jx6LEP0uIRamIUl7 +e+QK5SlumIUg+gzCueZbPX44bglA8nn+GGU/fNbjuwoyi9ncML6pUzxEt1nSUv6tZvwbc A8YMxvFJ6cAA+tuyvD20Ew6UVlt4ZQI= Received: from mail-ua1-f72.google.com (mail-ua1-f72.google.com [209.85.222.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-435-9bEb82i6OBWF4-c5j6I2cw-1; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 04:02:13 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 9bEb82i6OBWF4-c5j6I2cw-1 Received: by mail-ua1-f72.google.com with SMTP id f8-20020ab02e880000b029026744f1ff27so971132uaa.13 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 01:02:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bbLNEgcUOwVh8SZG9LazBkIiHPS74QOjKJiOLWh8tjE=; b=XCjizJuuc0xxx4qpt+0+1U9Q8DSYS3XAWRRf9kcNYSv1bQ2WeRQVmrYsuXnX/gfTXL 1FqP0CIuy8ADoeaeR4xuE6hdSngnoPmsxzRyg5BIImnSRhOt7OsO+IJ8XUcYOafWrg3T pRupEevYA9sx4Fnd1IslNctRyIdHKN28RE4T6gTO+YE66HZCkxg/a7tZilynDtheJ2mm xnrd6e7P6T618uP41t9OhicOiL8kTiTBaIoVhb58X/z3qu3QKU5vujUroUpKruyzdDJU lfwKhgV1V02uMWM8JwgFS/GRoclUnIlG+WD5pzyxLeTOcmMh4J1l7dl+smsxcgyVg3xh ei4Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530st6Gvet5SMkZEJbxPbH3kZrxUm3ENPjedrjuewGFld9AxQ8Jp ulh1T89W6YCPi7vzcMUwMnmLaYEDy02Mr/m23huTSDTPZqu6W4IP6cMIqV8XDPvDSOXDISgGFiF aWQO4cnpKkK6FPW6fmw== X-Received: by 2002:a67:cd08:: with SMTP id u8mr3588418vsl.18.1623312133289; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 01:02:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxJhpcT6YHoEbhA8jTr56PI9oOSPiJ7W+lSFlAJ/JAsu+Jm/5LjU0MP4s7LTpDKFTW8dhutHrMrZkIJXKf1gKY= X-Received: by 2002:a67:cd08:: with SMTP id u8mr3588397vsl.18.1623312133063; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 01:02:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 10:02:01 +0200 Message-ID: To: Brandon Lo Cc: Lincoln Lavoie , dpdklab , ci@dpdk.org, Aaron Conole , Thomas Monjalon , Ray Kinsella , Dodji Seketeli Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdklab] ABI test failing for openSUSE and Arch Linux X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 5:07 PM Brandon Lo wrote: > To streamline this entire process, we are working on a job or pipeline > to automate refreshing all of the images and recreate the ABI > references. I understand the motivation, but will we have a clear idea of which ABI reference has been used and how to reproduce its generation (sha1, toolchain, libc, libabigail and such packages versions, version of the script generating the reference) ? If something breaks later and we don't know clearly how/if a reference changed, it will be a pain to analyse. -- David Marchand