From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA494A0C51 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 10:18:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D25CB4067C; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 10:18:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8021E4003C for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 10:18:18 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1623313098; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=eFLj/q5Pz2psnF4cLLiyS3BBO3lKTLwv3DwR7gloIEk=; b=MT+0/gck1QvpqLEkkmi3NlCARASVF4NvzgVPDDqx1WGEbtCm50q9W35Xsq7ow/NnQdq1MC +52aaLaM90bhwTNX68R7KyZmZDxTY2qUux7/GWR7/lroSrTvpwzxHmehKsX7JfsOia3vxH dDhSAStXOg1LKXCGuHY6DVgi5RKLeeU= Received: from mail-vs1-f72.google.com (mail-vs1-f72.google.com [209.85.217.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-454-1Yf6bOn4OUWOdDQ5_Iu6Xw-1; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 04:18:10 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 1Yf6bOn4OUWOdDQ5_Iu6Xw-1 Received: by mail-vs1-f72.google.com with SMTP id j11-20020a67ef0b0000b029025d2626b5beso645288vsr.18 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 01:18:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=eFLj/q5Pz2psnF4cLLiyS3BBO3lKTLwv3DwR7gloIEk=; b=duMu0M/VnP1GXV0dcCmTE3YuHfRy4Az8GXC5+2TOYCqeg+p2EJ7jnOC6cZ/LWQD2It SZ4xmmOdqNDIat4C1Vg5Z0vKQYd52N0ZfDSY7Q4+76Q599lMm7J9dXlJanWdJrEgnIUT v+/3O18lS5+hpP2pcfdGvB5A5OBt/l6TGuq15EKypwIPvEJb76BfpT5I1y5rOV8ZEGGg ETap3NDwgVQQ6aXd1Zyft6jOcWEVg3BLZcT3OFWVSeJa15E9xP+yKG65L5o2a2erbQS1 HbDA21v7afFaWY8ZkaOHY5kY/DnNtXBeWvGAnzDoceB0LcaGXMMYg6iMgNvW8+/TCaGD Z9UQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53048lVefLr/3v1+iwo1otPrD56iolqq8nM1WnXXb7V50BC5N4WR nZHTfAESmnHbg+pM5vDuux1OXkrNQYHiKZbeFdy/kThQnnG5Jo0i65gCMWoCBolLLOiDaBchuLp 3WkA5GjpBEBkoNgL0FA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:67a:: with SMTP id z26mr3829879vsf.10.1623313090195; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 01:18:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzs5jhns3RtFWhXtT07dYiOK+IMVf3Tr9kKgPNUpFHfmR/7WDBZM+5m3vTt0efDHfWmURS4P9KW/foLHJ8KkM4= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:67a:: with SMTP id z26mr3829877vsf.10.1623313090055; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 01:18:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 10:17:58 +0200 Message-ID: To: "Chen, Zhaoyan" Cc: ci@dpdk.org, sys_stv , Aaron Conole , Andrew Rybchenko , "Yigit, Ferruh" , Thomas Monjalon , longfengx.liang@intel.com Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] CI failing on dpdk-next-net-intel X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 10:14 AM David Marchand wrote: > Please, can Intel check their mirrors of next-net-* branches are up to date? This could explain the following bz too: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=727 -- David Marchand