From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02F7BA0C4E for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 10:39:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B79D44067C; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 10:39:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D518E4003C for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 10:39:33 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1623314373; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ECBcdYOCZsd0S22YlKovzA8y0cDIE/0Cn19wL9oBBJY=; b=Rvbixo1GUvbZ2pKwXvUGb/r27OG+EavfBbsYPsrGl9SllcXgVYEn+QE/h4bD5DzfD39AvY 58C1zXk6R6V0SyXePsz4zf4MYMwNiQYq2fy3PvPqQ/5bfHydAXGTObXTJ7TBP8lRQfvuR/ BQP5pHNRxN6jYlFUnHcWbZVuGdiyHMA= Received: from mail-vs1-f70.google.com (mail-vs1-f70.google.com [209.85.217.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-164-VtpY772LNG2REyJw4G04mQ-1; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 04:39:32 -0400 X-MC-Unique: VtpY772LNG2REyJw4G04mQ-1 Received: by mail-vs1-f70.google.com with SMTP id z10-20020a056102020ab029025f66f03e6cso660204vsp.21 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 01:39:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ECBcdYOCZsd0S22YlKovzA8y0cDIE/0Cn19wL9oBBJY=; b=lKR7iTQLoKZNUD/s/gtdbbMPmUwfb/BHW/Wcam9n9BdnaX7Zbkq8SFflv6rgW/5vmC EVDuJDoePh0eysCQXsPcuGRDgI4hVy1jwwDZoCmVxEOL83bYGjxb3SqFQXQJwQ9aXqOZ ycALL56qqx14kVrcjZXglAbJVT+Gi73NrLSgaNin9zBvUYN3lo51HyTdC6ahBXSOo1Tk ZE32sXztqq3dGTPm0wFhcXYSvJ3ZPZlyjzu7x5sVJwcPEYWqpyBEntZe+XD2+0Hjfa8q LvD4CyeHnM+Ew7QdUJ6nu2gEX/q9ul5Dh5eAnuCD10a5+WYnmC3jYHaNYZz8XVEpCfvv rcDw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5326UGJAOP0WWvBwq4sShMuDp0aH2rzfGmKojw0ScW1LZQce+hWx c5azBK6lGe5Js/tsz+tIM9xvEjphl0oRe8WMQn0vALMXBwREVaSBTa3BGGz8CB8ltvTtECKiSH8 s2DYRDKdDZcEBPVy2rw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:67a:: with SMTP id z26mr3856326vsf.10.1623314356168; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 01:39:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJydjSlx6thf8V4UgMY0xS7v0qzlxLz8LpD4EMHQcqQqTOgY9TM7EZgi3iA6m9gxQpP8QIYoSyauFipcP4hYHtE= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:67a:: with SMTP id z26mr3856318vsf.10.1623314355953; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 01:39:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 10:39:05 +0200 Message-ID: To: "Chen, Zhaoyan" Cc: ci@dpdk.org, sys_stv , Aaron Conole , Andrew Rybchenko , "Yigit, Ferruh" , Thomas Monjalon , longfengx.liang@intel.com, "Mcnamara, John" Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] CI failing on dpdk-next-net-intel X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" Cc: John. On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 10:17 AM David Marchand wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 10:14 AM David Marchand > wrote: > > Please, can Intel check their mirrors of next-net-* branches are up to date? > > This could explain the following bz too: > https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=727 -- David Marchand