From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30B1EA04DB for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 14:00:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28CF71ED85; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 14:00:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [63.128.21.124]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ACCC1ED84 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 13:59:59 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1602849598; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/3Mqt0mWketPcxbHGJs6Q24XKlQ71kW/oQXxovb4nxo=; b=YGhQI4i3exnyqvFDgXnDkvNhLCUq2rVd2138ouy4vlJyTfQEUjC8l1nANyLARV47Vg3GBe OsrXSFqbKMzSDGn+E2EGx6uCzMU/la/o1Yj9J0LK4wexT7syePlBOmMzVKPBUEUVysWrK9 A7Ml3p9kssEJvR2CeA6o4K4uXYYRjDc= Received: from mail-vk1-f198.google.com (mail-vk1-f198.google.com [209.85.221.198]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-210-fGuId_rnNZaABm9V8mTXAw-1; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 07:59:55 -0400 X-MC-Unique: fGuId_rnNZaABm9V8mTXAw-1 Received: by mail-vk1-f198.google.com with SMTP id e6so833115vkb.11 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 04:59:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/3Mqt0mWketPcxbHGJs6Q24XKlQ71kW/oQXxovb4nxo=; b=fDhARyWArSm5iTmWVh7QoOOmmlPv0hNMOquYVtnr3WWn5szrEz2EcTDsNO//mW6jFB jz2kZGUReFOAl43KA7Kfse9qIC7b40gqGi7DuRPbDfGyaJKQKfA70n5tcau1iZq0258L HXvm4940Zu34MZE0jUPYNqyoNe+TAAf9GgqW+Vuzay2gfeOKh6ADHdqT7rT6WAiMgpD7 g9Z6rAbLifxzHEQVEWrWXR9TzB6GR76OE1EWV8P+VPYcOqR7esrZFN6uFEdi2BAfH4pn 2yFBxfiPomcqAu8b/aZPa0/Wn7UMzeUgx5TlB+zVlswlqpOG3XUwjNFHoVOaRrT0baQp +5mA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5301zcOqWuI5ASfLR/jcFUKmDTOyhwmiB+SyJtsZ7f2a8z3W1HkC 0wBy3Ml0/3s2Dq0te27R1QRjOFBw6VRlf9tDy3Hde4EIC7Mhzog/Sc1YUHqykiQu9f3nvtPg9h0 /DdEdeTd2xMZUOxJy3g== X-Received: by 2002:a67:68c9:: with SMTP id d192mr1536200vsc.5.1602849594924; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 04:59:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyxvgurOFYAA0Az6OCHuZ0HB0IYNAk/AAvNXKKy2whSZd+nWs5icjMh91GL5fyzLa2fPGXhbzb1sfcY+3Ig9jM= X-Received: by 2002:a67:68c9:: with SMTP id d192mr1536190vsc.5.1602849594714; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 04:59:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201016112906.GA19060@sivswdev09.ir.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20201016112906.GA19060@sivswdev09.ir.intel.com> From: David Marchand Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 13:59:43 +0200 Message-ID: To: "Liang, Ma" Cc: Aaron Conole , Michael Santana , ci@dpdk.org, "Yigit, Ferruh" , David Hunt , "Burakov, Anatoly" Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] Question about Arm64 clang travis building failure ? X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 1:29 PM Liang, Ma wrote: > > Hi All, > > We hit a very strange Arm64 clang test failure on the travis system. > Please Ref: https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/builds/190252708 > and related patch set is http://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/80896/ > Our change not really has any impact to Arm64, we only add a dummy > stub for Arm64 subarch. from the log, we didn't figure out what's > the root cause of failure. Any hint for this issue ? https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/jobs/400159548#L3709 Hopefully fixed with: https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/?id=52bb6be259ff74495dc640e568f2115f57fc82a9 -- David Marchand