DPDK CI discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Intel CI failing on updated DTS patchset
       [not found] <ab3bf2$2s5kqk@fmviesa010-auth.fm.intel.com>
@ 2024-12-13 16:00 ` Luca Vizzarro
  2024-12-13 16:01   ` Luca Vizzarro
  2024-12-13 16:14   ` David Marchand
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Luca Vizzarro @ 2024-12-13 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: rajesh.t.puttaswamy; +Cc: ci, Paul Szczepanek

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7013 bytes --]

Hi there,

I’ve sent a v2 fixing this patch, but for some reason the CI has failed again with the same problem, even if it’s been resolved. The lines referenced are also no longer there.

Could you please look into this?

Thank you so much for your time!

Best,
Luca

From: sys_stv@intel.com <sys_stv@intel.com>
Date: Thursday, 12 December 2024 at 14:28
To: test-report@dpdk.org <test-report@dpdk.org>, Luca Vizzarro <Luca.Vizzarro@arm.com>
Subject: compilation|FAILURE| pw(149207) sid(34141) job(PER_PATCH_BUILD14359)[v2,7/7] dts: update linters in doc page

Test-Label: Intel-compilation
Test-Status: FAILURE
http://dpdk.org/patch/149207

_Compilation issues_

Submitter: Luca Vizzarro <luca.vizzarro@arm.com>
Date: 2024-12-12 14:00:13
Reply_mail: <20241212140013.17548-8-luca.vizzarro@arm.com>

DPDK git baseline: Repo:dpdk, CommitID: 7df61db6c387703a36306c1aea92225921e2eeb2


Meson Build Summary: 23 Builds Done, 22 Successful, 1 Failures, 0 Blocked

+------------------+------------+--------------+------------+------------+-----------+----------+------------+
| os               | gcc-static | clang-static | icc-static | gcc-shared | gcc-debug | document | gcc-16byte |
+------------------+------------+--------------+------------+------------+-----------+----------+------------+
| OpenAnolis8.9-64 | pass       |              |            |            |           |          |            |
| FreeBSD14-64     | pass       | pass         |            | pass       | pass      |          |            |
| RHEL94-64        | pass       | pass         |            | pass       | pass      |          |            |
| SUSE15-64        | pass       | pass         |            |            |           |          |            |
| AzureLinux3.0-64 | pass       |              |            |            |           |          |            |
| UB2404-32        | pass       |              |            |            |           |          |            |
| RHEL8.10-64      | pass       |              |            |            |           |          |            |
| UB2404-64        | pass       | pass         |            |            |           | fail     | pass       |
| RHEL94-64Rt      | pass       |              |            |            |           |          |            |
| UB2410-64        | pass       |              |            |            |           |          |            |
| FC40-64          | pass       | pass         |            |            |           |          |            |
| UB2404-64Rt      | pass       |              |            |            |           |          |            |
+------------------+------------+--------------+------------+------------+-----------+----------+------------+

Comments:
Because of DPDK bug (https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=928),
All the dpdk-next-* branch add `Ddisable_drivers=event/cnxk` option when build with ICC complier.

Test environment and configuration as below:


OS: OpenAnolis8.9-64
        Kernel Version: 5.10.134-16.2.an8.x86_64
        GCC Version: gcc (GCC) 8.5.0 20210514 (Anolis 8.5.0-22.0.1)
        Clang Version: 15.0.7 (Anolis 15.0.7-1.0.3.module+an8.8.0+11135+e398acfc)
        x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc

OS: FreeBSD14-64
        Kernel Version: 14.1-RELEASE
        GCC Version: gcc (FreeBSD Ports Collection) 13.2.0
        Clang Version: 18.1.5 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git llvmorg-18.1.5-0-g617a15a9eac9)
        x86_64-native-bsdapp-gcc
        x86_64-native-bsdapp-clang
        x86_64-native-bsdapp-gcc+shared
        x86_64-native-bsdapp-gcc+debug

OS: RHEL94-64
        Kernel Version: 5.14.0-427.13.1.el9_4.x86_64
        GCC Version: gcc (GCC) 11.4.1 20231218 (Red Hat 11.4.1-3)
        Clang Version: 17.0.6 (Red Hat, Inc. 17.0.6-5.el9)
        x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc
        x86_64-native-linuxapp-clang
        x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc+shared
        x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc+debug

OS: SUSE15-64
        Kernel Version: 6.4.0-150600.21-default
        GCC Version: gcc (SUSE Linux) 7.5.0
        Clang Version: 17.0.6
        x86_64-native-linuxapp-clang
        x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc

OS: AzureLinux3.0-64
        Kernel Version: 6.6.47.1-1.azl3
        GCC Version: gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
        Clang Version: 18.1.2
        x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc

OS: UB2404-32
        Kernel Version: 6.8.0-41-generic
        GCC Version: gcc (Ubuntu 13.2.0-23ubuntu4) 13.2.0
        Clang Version: NA
        i686-native-linuxapp-gcc

OS: RHEL8.10-64
        Kernel Version: 4.18.0-553.el8_10.x86_64
        GCC Version: gcc (GCC) 8.5.0 20210514 (Red Hat 8.5.0-21)
        Clang Version: 17.0.6 (Red Hat 17.0.6-1.module+el8.10.0+20808+e12784c0)
        x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc

OS: UB2404-64
        Kernel Version: 6.8.0-41-generic
        GCC Version: gcc (Ubuntu 13.2.0-23ubuntu4) 13.2.0
        Clang Version: NA
        x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc+16byte
        x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc
        x86_64-native-linuxapp-clang
        x86_64-native-linuxapp-doc

OS: RHEL94-64Rt
        Kernel Version: 5.14.0-427.13.1.el9_4.x86_64+rt
        GCC Version: gcc (GCC) 11.4.1 20231218 (Red Hat 11.4.1-3)
        Clang Version: 17.0.6 (Red Hat, Inc. 17.0.6-5.el9)
        x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc

OS: UB2410-64
        Kernel Version: 6.11.0-8-generic
        GCC Version: gcc (Ubuntu 14.2.0-4ubuntu2) 14.2.0
        Clang Version: NA
        x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc

OS: FC40-64
        Kernel Version: 6.8.5-301.fc40.x86_64
        GCC Version: gcc (GCC) 14.0.1 20240411 (Red Hat 14.0.1-0)
        Clang Version: 18.1.1 (Fedora 18.1.1-1.fc40)
        x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc
        x86_64-native-linuxapp-clang

OS: UB2404-64Rt
        Kernel Version: 6.8.0-rt8
        GCC Version: gcc (Ubuntu 13.2.0-23ubuntu4) 13.2.0
        Clang Version: NA
        x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc



*Build Failed #1:
OS: UB2404-64
Target: x86_64-native-linuxapp-doc
FAILED: doc/guides/html
/usr/bin/python3 ../buildtools/call-sphinx-build.py /usr/bin/sphinx-build 25.03.0-rc0 /root/UB2404-64_K6.8.0_GCC13.2.0/x86_64-native-linuxapp-doc/34141/dpdk/doc/guides /root/UB2404-64_K6.8.0_GCC13.2.0/x86_64-native-linuxapp-doc/34141/dpdk/x86_64-native-linuxapp-doc/doc/guides -a -W
Install the sphinx ReadTheDocs theme for improved html documentation layout: https://sphinx-rtd-theme.readthedocs.io/

Warning, treated as error:
/root/UB2404-64_K6.8.0_GCC13.2.0/x86_64-native-linuxapp-doc/34141/dpdk/doc/guides/tools/dts.rst:435:start-after pattern not found: [tool.pylama]
ninja: build stopped


DPDK STV team
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 17031 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Intel CI failing on updated DTS patchset
  2024-12-13 16:00 ` Intel CI failing on updated DTS patchset Luca Vizzarro
@ 2024-12-13 16:01   ` Luca Vizzarro
  2024-12-13 16:14   ` David Marchand
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Luca Vizzarro @ 2024-12-13 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: rajesh.t.puttaswamy; +Cc: ci, Paul Szczepanek

On 13/12/2024 16:00, Luca Vizzarro wrote:
> IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are 
> confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended 
> recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the 
> contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy 
> the information in any medium. Thank you.

Please dismiss this notice, it was added accidentally. Apologies for this.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Intel CI failing on updated DTS patchset
  2024-12-13 16:00 ` Intel CI failing on updated DTS patchset Luca Vizzarro
  2024-12-13 16:01   ` Luca Vizzarro
@ 2024-12-13 16:14   ` David Marchand
  2024-12-16 21:41     ` Patrick Robb
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Marchand @ 2024-12-13 16:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Luca Vizzarro
  Cc: rajesh.t.puttaswamy, ci, Paul Szczepanek, Thomas Monjalon,
	Aaron Conole, Bruce Richardson, Mcnamara, John

On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 5:00 PM Luca Vizzarro <Luca.Vizzarro@arm.com> wrote:
> I’ve sent a v2 fixing this patch, but for some reason the CI has failed again with the same problem, even if it’s been resolved. The lines referenced are also no longer there.

I don't really see the point of reporting doc testing per patch from Intel CI.

Documentation testing per patch is broken in Intel CI, as doc/ updates
are filtered:
http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/CY5PR11MB618735108D3E9D90C67EEF96F5DA9@CY5PR11MB6187.namprd11.prod.outlook.com/

So this report is about testing merged code, but not your changes.


-- 
David Marchand


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Intel CI failing on updated DTS patchset
  2024-12-13 16:14   ` David Marchand
@ 2024-12-16 21:41     ` Patrick Robb
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Patrick Robb @ 2024-12-16 21:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: rajesh.t.puttaswamy
  Cc: Luca Vizzarro, ci, Paul Szczepanek, Thomas Monjalon,
	Aaron Conole, Bruce Richardson, Mcnamara, John, David Marchand

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1273 bytes --]

Hi Rajesh,

Do you (or someone at your team) know what the "Document" test from the
table in Luca's email is covering?

I see from Lijuan's email that in your patch apply process, you are using a
command like: git pw series apply 26733 --exclude=doc/**

So I guess we need to decide between disabling the test in your CI, or
returning to applying the doc/** files.

Perhaps you can join the DPDK CI call on January 7 at 1500 UTC and we can
discuss? I'm happy to add this as an agenda item.

On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 11:15 AM David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 5:00 PM Luca Vizzarro <Luca.Vizzarro@arm.com>
> wrote:
> > I’ve sent a v2 fixing this patch, but for some reason the CI has failed
> again with the same problem, even if it’s been resolved. The lines
> referenced are also no longer there.
>
> I don't really see the point of reporting doc testing per patch from Intel
> CI.
>
> Documentation testing per patch is broken in Intel CI, as doc/ updates
> are filtered:
>
> http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/CY5PR11MB618735108D3E9D90C67EEF96F5DA9@CY5PR11MB6187.namprd11.prod.outlook.com/
>
> So this report is about testing merged code, but not your changes.
>
>
> --
> David Marchand
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2194 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-12-16 21:43 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <ab3bf2$2s5kqk@fmviesa010-auth.fm.intel.com>
2024-12-13 16:00 ` Intel CI failing on updated DTS patchset Luca Vizzarro
2024-12-13 16:01   ` Luca Vizzarro
2024-12-13 16:14   ` David Marchand
2024-12-16 21:41     ` Patrick Robb

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).