DPDK CI discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Robb <probb@iol.unh.edu>
To: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	Adam Hassick <ahassick@iol.unh.edu>,
	ci@dpdk.org, David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Adding Series Dependency to Patchwork
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 10:33:03 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJvnSUBfTTk8mvLHcZLyVjTebS+8M+u=Vb24=2r_SBVyD-KDnw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f7t1q7c7zko.fsf@redhat.com>

Perfect. Then we will proceed.

On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 10:18 AM Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> writes:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Yes I still think it is a valuable work to achieve.
> > If Aaron agrees, I wish you can complete this feature upstream.
>
> okay by me
>
> > Thank you
> >
> >
> > 04/04/2024 15:50, Patrick Robb:
> >> Hi Thomas,
> >>
> >> Adam explains more completely in the preceding email, but he has
> >> talked with the patchwork project maintainer, and determined the
> >> needed next steps to do work adding depends-on support to patchwork
> >> server. And he provides an estimate (35-50 hours of his time) for
> >> adding this feature to pw.
> >>
> >> What we want is a community opinion on using Community Lab resources
> >> (our developer time) towards this effort on patchwork project. I'm
> >> going to you, because you were the person who originally raised the
> >> depends on issue and adding this support to pw server.
> >>
> >> Given his time estimate, do you endorse this work, or do you prefer we
> >> focus on our SOW items and other community requests which are in queue
> >> right now? Thanks.
> >>
> >> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 2:51 PM Adam Hassick <ahassick@iol.unh.edu> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hi All,
> >> >
> >> > There has been a discussion on GitHub between myself and others about
> >> > adding support for series dependency to Patchwork. This would involve
> >> > adding the feature to the Patchwork dashboard and git-pw. However, it
> >> > seems like the maintainer would like us to do much of the required
> >> > implementation work. I estimate, with a low level of certainty, that
> >> > it would consume 35 to 50 hours of developer time.
> >> >
> >> > The active issue relating to this feature can be found here, as well
> >> > as the archived one:
> >> > https://github.com/getpatchwork/patchwork/issues/583
> >> >
> >> > Would it be worth it for us here at the Community Lab to contribute
> >> > upstream to Patchwork? Implementing the feature in the Patchwork
> >> > project will make our method for defining series dependencies the
> >> > standard, and it may lift some of the burden of maintaining this
> >> > feature off of us.
> >> >
> >> > Regards,
> >> > Adam Hassick
> >>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-11 14:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-22 19:51 Adam Hassick
2024-04-04 13:50 ` Patrick Robb
2024-04-05  6:41   ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-04-11 14:18     ` Aaron Conole
2024-04-11 14:33       ` Patrick Robb [this message]
2024-07-12 20:15         ` Adam Hassick
2024-07-19 15:32           ` Patrick Robb
2024-07-19 17:43             ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-07-19 17:40           ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-07-22 16:16             ` Adam Hassick
2024-07-22 16:28               ` Patrick Robb
2024-07-23 12:41                 ` Aaron Conole
     [not found]                 ` <6b425d90-78b2-497b-958c-9d36e2ba6e3b@amd.com>
2024-07-23 15:36                   ` Patrick Robb
2024-07-23 16:08                     ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-07-24 15:07                       ` Adam Hassick
2024-07-25  9:47                         ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-07-25 17:52                           ` Patrick Robb

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJvnSUBfTTk8mvLHcZLyVjTebS+8M+u=Vb24=2r_SBVyD-KDnw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=probb@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=aconole@redhat.com \
    --cc=ahassick@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=ci@dpdk.org \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).