From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D65643E45; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 16:33:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 180C7402A8; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 16:33:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-oo1-f41.google.com (mail-oo1-f41.google.com [209.85.161.41]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCF084029B for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 16:33:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-oo1-f41.google.com with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-5a50880ce2aso4871404eaf.0 for ; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 07:33:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; t=1712845994; x=1713450794; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=W8N15/+AOaAn8JTHsHxp6SQ6db9/r+T03UalG+FhHTY=; b=RN/dd2yKE5O9HRK9yl5MxIwMu/cVUwSMZ51Ps4f0zep9QHMSRUgc9Z/91h/i5SAHEO TMNpjddmivywfMCv7xEgLmoSa6KOzqzYpqYuT5Be6wX1SsbuQb/oHhWVO1CScAyEgYSp 2k59Aw8l0DIx2J3YBotj6h5zo9mmf5odsiUoE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712845994; x=1713450794; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=W8N15/+AOaAn8JTHsHxp6SQ6db9/r+T03UalG+FhHTY=; b=YIJIjC/qR4XSJV10HxXH8A2xxgi43ti3Cci1w2BLbJ1yo+dhKpGLlxq4WIiDfzzGpM BQ5OPUJOaxms6lTWkcqdRTU/l7zZc5tZqYcFvkKFAoWyoYAqoWtn07JK8QvyKWZ//Slx wOLGCYT2OTcf8ooLwHyjZO2yOsVtaOMDPOUgyclRoJZCDPr9kvVmRxk2+hj/P/fKte8Y rzkKx3lmIv9BQL0bAFRDUVyQ0tVCMRPR5X1cBL7fFzoKuu3TjsoOhi+DIHgTuG9wSHmj 7G5ipJsPCtCr92MyOD8rVbhyjLcqterDtO6HA5mXrd+IBgmkOIL7KrMsMJnrifdKlBKG NlEw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWcFNcj3W2JbD8H/KA9Of/OcZW211naKROgm0dBAeBxoWVh/d3pHo00ln+sF8uoa4e6RB/BglWaWm4wIw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzB3zG69wM4ckmOw/uXcATfJZgnv/So1OnhJ6A6cXgXdY+TEkGl TyXe91aWwk4kjj8p9qw7OM2w+cyK5rgHSnZSBML1eBC5G8s8O7kvcBbFpnvwm4mk8FF8ykEDLgL IG7cZxllbPcbDy0E9Ck2wAgML3vzo7pr5tj7urA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE/NhPUHB9QpoYQ0erd7aaRB3kdQHOQ4pFCFkQeFQFzFW8T2iedCN3MQDySpCUxTH2H4M6qylngIcpzkCtp9nM= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:e0d4:b0:22a:1ce4:c0cf with SMTP id a20-20020a056870e0d400b0022a1ce4c0cfmr6398346oab.55.1712845994040; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 07:33:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4881077.GXAFRqVoOG@thomas> In-Reply-To: From: Patrick Robb Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 10:33:03 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Adding Series Dependency to Patchwork To: Aaron Conole Cc: Thomas Monjalon , Adam Hassick , ci@dpdk.org, David Marchand Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Perfect. Then we will proceed. On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 10:18=E2=80=AFAM Aaron Conole = wrote: > > Thomas Monjalon writes: > > > Hello, > > > > Yes I still think it is a valuable work to achieve. > > If Aaron agrees, I wish you can complete this feature upstream. > > okay by me > > > Thank you > > > > > > 04/04/2024 15:50, Patrick Robb: > >> Hi Thomas, > >> > >> Adam explains more completely in the preceding email, but he has > >> talked with the patchwork project maintainer, and determined the > >> needed next steps to do work adding depends-on support to patchwork > >> server. And he provides an estimate (35-50 hours of his time) for > >> adding this feature to pw. > >> > >> What we want is a community opinion on using Community Lab resources > >> (our developer time) towards this effort on patchwork project. I'm > >> going to you, because you were the person who originally raised the > >> depends on issue and adding this support to pw server. > >> > >> Given his time estimate, do you endorse this work, or do you prefer we > >> focus on our SOW items and other community requests which are in queue > >> right now? Thanks. > >> > >> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 2:51=E2=80=AFPM Adam Hassick wrote: > >> > > >> > Hi All, > >> > > >> > There has been a discussion on GitHub between myself and others abou= t > >> > adding support for series dependency to Patchwork. This would involv= e > >> > adding the feature to the Patchwork dashboard and git-pw. However, i= t > >> > seems like the maintainer would like us to do much of the required > >> > implementation work. I estimate, with a low level of certainty, that > >> > it would consume 35 to 50 hours of developer time. > >> > > >> > The active issue relating to this feature can be found here, as well > >> > as the archived one: > >> > https://github.com/getpatchwork/patchwork/issues/583 > >> > > >> > Would it be worth it for us here at the Community Lab to contribute > >> > upstream to Patchwork? Implementing the feature in the Patchwork > >> > project will make our method for defining series dependencies the > >> > standard, and it may lift some of the burden of maintaining this > >> > feature off of us. > >> > > >> > Regards, > >> > Adam Hassick > >> >