From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DD1C456B1; Thu, 25 Jul 2024 19:53:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D66436E7; Thu, 25 Jul 2024 19:53:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-ot1-f48.google.com (mail-ot1-f48.google.com [209.85.210.48]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCB814363D for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2024 19:53:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-ot1-f48.google.com with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-709340bd54dso34760a34.1 for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2024 10:53:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; t=1721929987; x=1722534787; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=R6jH8Rh7U98h16/KhXb3TR+lHsRXWJD+ptjCN1RCu50=; b=QddNWMuXCcc7wLJwFOEN8JIjnIcnDhP6S1aQJJZ60dqRu+47WHeb/yvc5mqGUoYQ7b ordhPZxZev2CvKy8sZ1J3iAK9yQyeZQE4Jt9woi0HbFP73+K5PFX9H1zY8TJKGIWAILB jEb5qzce6ImnV1VVo9LbE/dowwsxgGcrP21rs= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1721929987; x=1722534787; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=R6jH8Rh7U98h16/KhXb3TR+lHsRXWJD+ptjCN1RCu50=; b=LsEdfEqnaFlEvgaTcL9j4iVN/6VYpKwH+2ItZhSnd856lRgZuYgH7/3JO9twme7VNf 4AJPiKU1qDp8Z1ZNuhfyEEFYD9CaAkuXBapIlJqmENET+RZeHA5LrAR8KLLni8/UdIzE /17mblNoT2yHncOI0C44Cvpj8/BD82gMhTvWCXKDaO1IdaJ8IOZdVpWlqEVyQzyX6/NE Nbvu3vwXWnhNtGIR9GbVYXheniVOR3kXM4AQH2LegRV6v4+UWJ9JIkZqywUl1HpStgmf vr+ZjQoFeEPwiBIC8rDrl9IrciPwlih92eA3L0mFOFfGHXrHrcAQhVznQ9D4d+fzLqAi rm8g== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCV0gc9Nt/4YbGLadpzTym7emoIQ/IMJwtuXSAk8zSBixyZzEvJxgkBl6SA4lFtC+/lERRDpow313r5c2w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzvtEqjeBMJMd4KnFizn1mPVbnIe+d2ZbmGsZ4TKTbKtligXv67 jgC0QJN5AKsmrMmhVdXiKKu44GfVgg2nQgK9UYGN5MJC+3MDW+R5+Gt3QS89y+OJkJYe2GoSOb8 DbmBnsCx7xoIQ6GmXuKFGd/UCr1doKezFmT5ZLA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEPpUphSf+ca4c9VNbNM7unL53Odj0MHyUkFqe+1MYNvn06fNd8Oxa5SPPNrqyj4C9GP8JDaIy1V8rD7m+4HJw= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:608a:b0:709:373f:fc92 with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-709374000e4mr770733a34.1.1721929987148; Thu, 25 Jul 2024 10:53:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4881077.GXAFRqVoOG@thomas> <76332523-96ac-407d-b937-c1f8a99808fa@amd.com> <6b425d90-78b2-497b-958c-9d36e2ba6e3b@amd.com> <9f800999-98b1-4e18-bd14-352affb81da6@amd.com> <8027a8c9-3911-4715-9aa6-2e804e0e7688@amd.com> In-Reply-To: <8027a8c9-3911-4715-9aa6-2e804e0e7688@amd.com> From: Patrick Robb Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 13:52:56 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Adding Series Dependency to Patchwork To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: Adam Hassick , ci@dpdk.org, Aaron Conole Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 5:57=E2=80=AFAM Ferruh Yigit = wrote: > > On 7/24/2024 4:07 PM, Adam Hassick wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 12:08=E2=80=AFPM Ferruh Yigit wrote: > > An unrelated note about the v2: Earlier I mentioned that we might > > support cover letter IDs to reference a series dependency. I've > > decided to forgo that feature because developers do not always > > resubmit cover letters when they submit new versions of a patch > > series. For example, if they depend on the v3 of a patch and they use > > the cover letter message ID submitted with v1, that will introduce a > > dependency on v1. This could lead to some confusion. > > > > As far as I can see if a patch series has cover letter, more likely it > will have cover letter in next version. Okay, this was not my impression, so thanks for setting the record straight= . Sorry Adam for me giving you the wrong idea about common cover letter resubmission practices. :) > > If cover letter is not supported, and dependent series has a cover > letter, is the expectation to add first patch of the series as > dependency skipping cover letter? This maybe also confusing. Yes this would work, but I can see how having this expectation may be confusing. So, we can abandon this idea. > > For the sample you give, if dependent patch decided to drop cover letter > in v3, won't it work to provide first patch of v3 as dependency? > Yes.