DPDK CI discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Robb <probb@iol.unh.edu>
To: ci@dpdk.org
Cc: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>, zhoumin <zhoumin@loongson.cn>,
	 "Brandes, Shai" <shaibran@amazon.com>,
	 "Puttaswamy, Rajesh T" <rajesh.t.puttaswamy@intel.com>,
	Paul Szczepanek <Paul.Szczepanek@arm.com>,
	 Luca Vizzarro <Luca.Vizzarro@arm.com>,
	Ali Alnubani <alialnu@nvidia.com>,
	 Andre Muezerie <andremue@linux.microsoft.com>,
	mamcgove@microsoft.com
Subject: Re: Finding a better timeslot(s) for the DPDK CI Testing Meeting
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 09:54:09 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJvnSUDZns31YxWSs+zp3c3EE+2Uyfr1+mZvFs4Xw=QmcnP1qA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJvnSUC6pe4P=mJGML94QOzhhn7ykwS0hExNj45tztbtFFL3nA@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1363 bytes --]

Hi all,

Thanks for responding to the survey for the DPDK CI Meeting timeslot. What
I'm going to do for this week is reschedule the meeting to Wednesday June
25 at 13:00 UTC.

Shai will have a hard stop at 13:30 UTC, so I will move the AWS discussion
forward ahead of the other labs, so we can address any AWS topics before he
has to drop.

We can continue to play with the meeting time going forward based on
feedback from you guys, but let's see if this works. Thanks.

-Patrick

On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 8:21 AM Patrick Robb <probb@iol.unh.edu> wrote:

> Hello DPDK CI Lab maintainers and other meeting participants.
>
> It has been a while since we have evaluated the regular meeting time for
> the DPDK CI meeting, and some new people have gotten involved in DPDK CI
> since then, so we want to check if there is a timeslot(s) which will work
> better for the group than the current "every other Thursday at 13:00 UTC"
> schedule.
>
> Anyone involved in DPDK CI - please take a moment to fill out this "when
> to meet" survey, indicating your free timeslots:
> https://www.when2meet.com/?30965992-3ijyI
>
> I think this is particularly important for lab maintainers, as being able
> to meet over video conference, even if it's not every two weeks, would
> probably help us sync our efforts in a big way.
>
> Thanks all!
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2351 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2025-06-23 13:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-12 12:21 Patrick Robb
2025-06-23 13:54 ` Patrick Robb [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJvnSUDZns31YxWSs+zp3c3EE+2Uyfr1+mZvFs4Xw=QmcnP1qA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=probb@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=Luca.Vizzarro@arm.com \
    --cc=Paul.Szczepanek@arm.com \
    --cc=aconole@redhat.com \
    --cc=alialnu@nvidia.com \
    --cc=andremue@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=ci@dpdk.org \
    --cc=mamcgove@microsoft.com \
    --cc=rajesh.t.puttaswamy@intel.com \
    --cc=shaibran@amazon.com \
    --cc=zhoumin@loongson.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).