From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44C4146A0D; Fri, 20 Jun 2025 19:35:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ED5B402F2; Fri, 20 Jun 2025 19:35:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pg1-f176.google.com (mail-pg1-f176.google.com [209.85.215.176]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 230E840267 for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2025 19:35:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pg1-f176.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-b26f7d2c1f1so2259993a12.0 for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2025 10:35:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; t=1750440944; x=1751045744; darn=dpdk.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=9l+YHNWpDxBmTEUXgt+EGwQ5Y9RIL6XDZDAESGiOCXA=; b=UmR2MgtmsOs3tl2af1PitgsNj1N4BpMiwW5kVOxRi4tcyi5Npy8tsiYXPvrBv/DLHK gnUYIL1i3aT1anHIZdvjjXMD64SmOWHr21pEPAesU5NQJ5Lv15zErbskAKh9amhWcKTf EY+zQxCbG7z5BlJwhpTw3OLLnAgbvL8ymeX8A= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1750440944; x=1751045744; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=9l+YHNWpDxBmTEUXgt+EGwQ5Y9RIL6XDZDAESGiOCXA=; b=XaAx18BVdE5EcfZ1cFWAJ5TchcUj10OIP9Yp8kg+xb4s3xRgSl1cvGbF5a/CqVmina PfaCKt5qaUPZpp7Fz1Tcj/5BgPyvPK0FphbFaRPKX5utjTkEsYIEhASJ11o0HGAgcGt+ GqtPKH+jGC1r8Ei+8cZdig8+kqp2sOUfUOcYvrB57ed+dxuKpbT7ztwY+HrZRNyB2xkb hUZEuoz4x2/lJ+VeHcaFsQFVRCkQ7pmmUKC7z0deIKnt1kCmuAoWqcn/H4YwQ2SwtexH DMkMNOMiwygfYL98GGnBFZZhx4etuZf7rWOQIbvBAlbvwm4rbdPL3k1otwgTk2Cc1JjK 4okw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCV+IxOyePD/uFOBAOJd3wwMm+JOS3sZnGgzYsGs0uZyclfzHWoY1oPEZRkgzD6+tVJQkA==@dpdk.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwmSGRGKZMwZY5yST1rs0Q5RuKCR9di2c3AG15/5mn7so8X1fr8 9GYrVCDn2yDPSpguDxFR3h/ho5Ev6RiMXgIgxPPe0A4QPTaqK2Qp5JoGDGZHUG0Rhpq2ssADRBB vaDkMPU7Md4IXw6l/7QXICTdNbuW+8C+CBK35SiruiA== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctFUc4+Tw6FSKAcKigvTLzMiYSZHuTH7OCNjzCqNH9YzNTPV9G9e9ABh6ZAx4C gz5D1TkKTPKfLMLsSNSfq4uCGQ8BnjtepB35tb5WE2mXJlnKwvMkanmZyV9AkxrTUlH9o1dytCn u5QGYX+jzz4QwpJrJYWBsnWJKY2xYGbKH5wNZ8V0kYCZeRwtygdgfaQh8Px9Sf2+fyeCQUlY4vl 1ja X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHIviZbiDgn/pq7Y0jMpk6Hr0wJZst/4B8KovefECR10KE/gIXOsKbPtWof4YZRyaupSLNsIKqIatnGf4PGrv8= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:2dc8:b0:313:d79e:1f48 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-3159d8c6023mr7125551a91.16.1750440944048; Fri, 20 Jun 2025 10:35:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Patrick Robb Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 13:30:24 -0400 X-Gm-Features: AX0GCFsD1cZw0YqsjpAeNIGt0FssvG8tMQ5DBrJ8N0FV4w_QS4YNkRo8ojVX4-c Message-ID: Subject: Re: Test Report Email Too Large To: Manit Mahajan , ci@dpdk.org Cc: alialnu@nvidia.com, shaibran@amazon.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000abb35c0638044a1b" X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org --000000000000abb35c0638044a1b Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +ci@dpdk.org On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 1:14=E2=80=AFPM Manit Mahajan wrote: > Hi Ali and Shai, > > I'm reaching out regarding a test report that was flagged as too large fo= r > the mailing list: > |FAILURE| pw154549 [PATCH] crypto/cnxk: add sessionless asym cn20k suppor= t > > The rejection message indicated that the email was 564KB, exceeding the > 500KB limit: > Message body is too big: 564556 bytes with a limit of 500 KB > > However, when looking at the test report, the actual email size appears t= o > be well within the limit. The test report emails says it is 17KB. Here is > the link to the report: > > http://inbox.dpdk.org/test-report/505157275.540.1750274462804@ip-10-159-2= 34-77.eu-west-1.compute.internal/ > > The test was run on al-sw-devops. Flagging this so it doesn=E2=80=99t go = unnoticed > and to help prevent future occurrences. > > Best Regards, > Manit Mahajan > InterOperability Laboratory > --000000000000abb35c0638044a1b Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
=
On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 1:14=E2=80=AFPM Manit Mahajan <<= a href=3D"mailto:mmahajan@iol.unh.edu">mmahajan@iol.unh.edu> wrote:<= br>
Hi Ali and Shai,

I'm reaching out regarding a= test report that was flagged as too large for the mailing list:
|FAILUR= E| pw154549 [PATCH] crypto/cnxk: add sessionless asym cn20k support

= The=C2=A0rejection message indicated that the email was=C2=A0564KB,=C2=A0ex= ceeding=C2=A0the 500KB limit:
Message body is too big: 564556 bytes with= a limit of 500 KB

However, when looking at the test repo= rt, the actual email size appears=C2=A0to be well within=C2=A0the limit. Th= e test report emails says it is 17KB. Here is the=C2=A0link to the report:<= br>http://inb= ox.dpdk.org/test-report/505157275.540.1750274462804@ip-10-159-234-77.eu-wes= t-1.compute.internal/

The test was run on=C2=A0al-sw-devops. Fla= gging this so it doesn=E2=80=99t go unnoticed and to help prevent future oc= currences.

Best Regards,
Manit Mahajan
InterOperability Labo= ratory=C2=A0
--000000000000abb35c0638044a1b--