From: Patrick Robb <probb@iol.unh.edu>
To: "Brandes, Shai" <shaibran@amazon.com>
Cc: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
"ci@dpdk.org" <ci@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: AWS lab meson test fails
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 08:38:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJvnSUDmkYJmkE4PS7Da9QzGXVdLdYg7z6fVb49F-tPmxCZJDA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <37fcfcd5c17f4fcbb212ffd6f2b20451@amazon.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1710 bytes --]
Hi Shai,
On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 6:20 AM Brandes, Shai <shaibran@amazon.com> wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> The failure status appears to be due to an issue applying the patch to the
> release notes RTS file.
> We suspect that the patch may have been applied to the incorrect DPDK tree.
> Could you advise if there is any specific metadata we should be using to
> determine the correct tree for applying the patch?
>
Here is the script which should be used to determine the tree to apply the
patchseries to:
https://git.dpdk.org/tools/dpdk-ci/tree/tools/pw_maintainers_cli.py
Even better than using that directly, though, is using this create series
artifact script, which will handle running pw_maintainers_cli.py and
applying the series from patchwork for you:
https://git.dpdk.org/tools/dpdk-ci/tree/tools/create_series_artifact.py
The process create_series_artifact.py uses is:
1. Try to apply to the tree suggested by pw_maintainers_cli.py. If
successful, proceed.
2. If there was an apply failure in 1, try to apply again, this time on
main. If successful, proceed.
3. If 1 and 2 failed, indicate that there was an apply failure.
Also, if your automation failed to apply the patch, the best thing is to
report "_apply patch failure_" in your test_report email, and bail out of
running testing (so don't run meson test in this case).
And then as a separate matter, I see you mentioned the same sort of .rst
apply failure situation was seen on a patch you submitted recently. We do
not currently have a strategy for mitigating this, but perhaps we should
develop one. Do you have any ideas? I can also raise this discussion during
the CI meeting.
Thanks Shai.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2373 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-12 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-11 17:39 Patrick Robb
2025-06-12 10:20 ` Brandes, Shai
2025-06-12 11:59 ` Brandes, Shai
2025-06-12 12:38 ` Patrick Robb [this message]
2025-06-12 12:42 ` Patrick Robb
2025-06-12 13:06 ` Brandes, Shai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJvnSUDmkYJmkE4PS7Da9QzGXVdLdYg7z6fVb49F-tPmxCZJDA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=probb@iol.unh.edu \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=ci@dpdk.org \
--cc=shaibran@amazon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).