From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2591A09FF for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:54:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD969140CC1; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:54:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-io1-f49.google.com (mail-io1-f49.google.com [209.85.166.49]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2DD8140CB5; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:54:53 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-io1-f49.google.com with SMTP id o6so17840314iob.10; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 05:54:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ESbRIKz+ATUQmTZVvPk+n/0YYnU4k4u0l5lFLwBdy7U=; b=NRwA0tx4uZRW/t0/saZicdF4liH54WjB+Nnaqv1oNuAeJP5Ok1yzlbc8oPPmUIO430 yzAcbp4bFCaKGGDmaldfkF4p75Yt3oGpXJGjGTvse0Xj1YfljDGkN0TRnHwwCsbhbFgq 9iGPrjuEw0HjWttxO+9sWHiOrr1v8BRb8W61OmloKDAibqIUGXdqbWhXg6Y8GS06KI+O C+2k6SoikSs/M2G0q95VOR+J/FHD8T3VpvanRGqm7Dt/ftARmTQdmQwHAHtiwCQbnxYJ 9orfHsMwoxX8XafcXQ6e5/j8u/Zjik8FLyRAirwKkRNtdXL7ZVizBKi+anaB87hlsnmv +T3A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ESbRIKz+ATUQmTZVvPk+n/0YYnU4k4u0l5lFLwBdy7U=; b=nq31vBKEY5TjqXR5UCQtIikD8XegNzzKPvLQDbB0PDy2M8EIh0FT/eI1XdV9dEaG4J 7BG9gJtmqbNDcrjvJetDWkW/PKbIBUsZCuPFqAnYnRvrAq0jLXYm1fSvMUFnpxf2mZ58 w7CK7C8+Yj3nhVUcm2eXJcNuJKweLkb4eSrlmOp4knkYOzw9kdj5Mmd6TFthn9P2mgY1 dxuWn2U626UGj0rHxtlxpg6bsqNMsehMjD26NtLLIne/TICQZ+BW5HIcF2YwyZhkYWMy ObIZ3d7pPDLCA2bPSiUOBq78vIVx/9dpqF/I6/lvWWL/bCYJhrxG0iIPHeRI4uPSP7BM DJtg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532nIoyWt7eySktwIMFdW2/3A4fLzxtZWr6BAboATcXKIhvluuQo 4ibCIGZcNVALRhy1y/+KitysAEa3B5Y34JSlgRE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw0DB1JCkST+kjfXiVxCu6pvUfE8FrVg6VkRqquGYq1Nz2MhfykG1CV27C3m1HHSJMWBcEms5T4g7MWeW9m5fY= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:93:: with SMTP id h19mr14598155iob.59.1610373292978; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 05:54:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Jerin Jacob Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 19:24:36 +0530 Message-ID: To: David Marchand Cc: dpdklab , Lincoln Lavoie , dev , ci@dpdk.org, Lukasz Wojciechowski , Aaron Conole , David Hunt Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-dev] distributor test failure in UNH CI on ARM X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 6:38 PM David Marchand wrote: > > Hey guys, > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 9:14 AM David Marchand > wrote: > > UNH CI is raising failures on a ARM server for the distributor test: > > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/15077/ > > > > Worker 59 handled 0 packets > > Worker 60 handled 0 packets > > Worker 61 handled 0 packets > > Worker 62 handled 0 packets > > Sanity test with non-zero hashes done > > === testing big burst (burst) === > > line 258: Missing packets, expected 783 > > Test Failed > > RTE>> > > --- stderr --- > > Looking at the dashboard, I did not see a passing instance of this > unit test for ARM. > Did it ever work? No. There are a lot of sync barriers are missing in the distributor library. Since evendev is kind of replacing this library, we made the fix as low priority. > > > > -- > David Marchand >