From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 338C1A0C43 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 14:04:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25CD5411A6; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 14:04:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-ej1-f47.google.com (mail-ej1-f47.google.com [209.85.218.47]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83BDD407FF for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 14:04:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-ej1-f47.google.com with SMTP id h9so38167407ejs.4 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 05:04:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Mxf1v43q3kroQWDacgFOYlvT4ztfDgwkH/yczBVRkJU=; b=F4CnczwqL8A29zIs6yoIaJgFTz1JBLfVXswL43lr5U6ADgWAFPSCUwYk4Q1pZ74lir qSgwiht8lbCNw4XgXAfYGJul0PkyyfEbjpnvtDpl1sozEH5QmAP3sfM9t/JBXS2EFPdw e/C54gUFwUTyRE0MYq7Lj5Ewy1h3vWEBjT1vo= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Mxf1v43q3kroQWDacgFOYlvT4ztfDgwkH/yczBVRkJU=; b=RtMXDQ4pv25Lza6ER4F1yI5n8ABHoCuvJyjwW9lmQXc5fLPCv+qN2HdAK80C23i4D5 ekzGgKXkmI3oBZzEhIGKICxiqD0YeEqtB7yiXibJvgU3StiPFE3/K0ZJo0SplAupxy18 4qQ56rZJYX7eoLylJPtvBSx5HHm/PSskHCDNIpCcYinZtYQjFlSLPnAkX7z4kyOccHZa 0cuUrMQiK4x2BujIg2QypGaNAaNB6LJU6JqiyFeal+nmBzse5WM7AMELnv6RzAcg0EaM 8ILnHvU0mAYbioJGTzqD62I4qk9gqvCyff7EZVAsN8PVRkPYjJvid46qq2DWHQTn+hzk 4lbA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531PNmAYGZIRlp3by4lOlFS4eabDjZ4eTTdzZkk4WIXLQl8EYapf ZqxnT4EvlrlDlc4ZLP2hifwOdKgs3I4RL+Xt/5hRtQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyKyOURm+HWKaNehGlKPmytxbTvBO5HPkwO9TlqjkXUraFUuX2aOFm60MwRtaaKdy2/RdKMVMoja7WAjnabzy4= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:909:: with SMTP id i9mr3588537ejd.16.1629201882160; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 05:04:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210808192658.284547-1-thomas@monjalon.net> In-Reply-To: From: Lincoln Lavoie Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 08:04:30 -0400 Message-ID: To: David Marchand Cc: Thomas Monjalon , ci@dpdk.org, dev , Ray Kinsella Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000074673e05c9c01f29" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [PATCH] version: 21.11-rc0 X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" --00000000000074673e05c9c01f29 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi David, ABI testing was disable / stopped on Friday in the Community CI lab. Patches from before that for 21.11 would have still had the test run and could have failures listed. I'm not sure if there is a way to "remove" those failure marks from patchworks. But, for all new patches since then, ABI hasn't been run. Cheers, Lincoln On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 2:34 AM David Marchand wrote: > On Sun, Aug 8, 2021 at 9:27 PM Thomas Monjalon > wrote: > > diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_11.rst > b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_11.rst > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000000..d707a554ef > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_11.rst > > @@ -0,0 +1,136 @@ > > [snip] > > > +Known Issues > > +------------ > > + > > +.. This section should contain new known issues in this release. Sample > format: > > + > > + * **Add title in present tense with full stop.** > > + > > + Add a short 1-2 sentence description of the known issue > > + in the present tense. Add information on any known workarounds. > > + > > + This section is a comment. Do not overwrite or remove it. > > + Also, make sure to start the actual text at the margin. > > + ======================================================= > > + > > + > > The known issue "**Last mbuf segment not implicitly reset.**" added in > 21.08 release notes still applies to 21.11. > But this can be fixed later, patches are starting to accumulate and > some CI failures are due to patches being applied to 21.08. > > The rest lgtm, so: > Acked-by: David Marchand > > Applied, thanks. > > > On this last subject, this mail is a ping to CI labs owners. > 21.11 release won't preserve ABI compat with previous releases, so > please disable ABI checks until 22.02. > > > -- > David Marchand > > -- *Lincoln Lavoie* Principal Engineer, Broadband Technologies 21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Durham, NH 03824 lylavoie@iol.unh.edu https://www.iol.unh.edu +1-603-674-2755 (m) --00000000000074673e05c9c01f29 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi = David,

ABI testing was di= sable / stopped on Friday in the Community CI lab.=C2=A0 Patches from befor= e that for 21.11 would have still had the test run and could have failures = listed. I'm not sure if there is a way to "remove" those fail= ure marks from patchworks.=C2=A0 But, for all new patches since then, ABI h= asn't been run.

Cheer= s,
Lincoln

On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 2:34 AM David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com> w= rote:
On Sun, Au= g 8, 2021 at 9:27 PM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
> diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_11.rst b/doc/guides/rel_n= otes/release_21_11.rst
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..d707a554ef
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_21_11.rst
> @@ -0,0 +1,136 @@

[snip]

> +Known Issues
> +------------
> +
> +.. This section should contain new known issues in this release. Samp= le format:
> +
> +=C2=A0 =C2=A0* **Add title in present tense with full stop.**
> +
> +=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Add a short 1-2 sentence description of the known= issue
> +=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0in the present tense. Add information on any know= n workarounds.
> +
> +=C2=A0 =C2=A0This section is a comment. Do not overwrite or remove it= .
> +=C2=A0 =C2=A0Also, make sure to start the actual text at the margin.<= br> > +=C2=A0 =C2=A0=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> +
> +

The known issue "**Last mbuf segment not implicitly reset.**" add= ed in
21.08 release notes still applies to 21.11.
But this can be fixed later, patches are starting to accumulate and
some CI failures are due to patches being applied to 21.08.

The rest lgtm, so:
Acked-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>

Applied, thanks.


On this last subject, this mail is a ping to CI labs owners.
21.11 release won't preserve ABI compat with previous releases, so
please disable ABI checks until 22.02.


--
David Marchand



--
Lincoln Lavoie
Prin= cipal Engineer, Broadband Technologies
21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, = Durham, NH 03824
+1-603-674-= 2755 (m)

--00000000000074673e05c9c01f29--