From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1198BA0C56 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 14:20:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A4FA4069E; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 14:20:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-ej1-f43.google.com (mail-ej1-f43.google.com [209.85.218.43]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53D3340687 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 14:20:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-ej1-f43.google.com with SMTP id d11so43862437eja.8 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 05:20:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=c/dPSnlLxgLO11JF18tgTljk/xQxn0xE+F1jacQfbzo=; b=FswBEGaEAaCNsE8O1hK+EKWQdE4hyKCzHLFMXjW92oVjQfpXQF9LpjuR/XnkmAejjE A4lQxCdU1QAfIvj1oqDD6lwnT/XVn/PKRLEGZCPXk4t8ZTXwA3BIbMMfajaDyrZVOm8Q KPWYQTjeT5oMxF+vpz+xKoI5Y08z+PglRrekc= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=c/dPSnlLxgLO11JF18tgTljk/xQxn0xE+F1jacQfbzo=; b=H9gVhsHkkHrB/hKN/CvhQjcJd+rs5AI5oT8NsdMLeS08EeDirBODghnqjfJs0rHUt2 TYF0qe9Z4tDQowumsi+rEQZLu0lkjSiEzo3FxtckbEBR8n1Xd243mZGbzDYyQVb92e7q H0YcnliH0UNtcfayp40FeuvwzOhc/er2jfJaTRo3WOF0KoIqSSyAr6Zn5PQxrgFNanP5 /8Ws35NzG+coWnz2gzS9eqg+9QPKteHmzsXbKnsCizCgwheaMZVbYViveU6gDkoP2uj6 VeWNSh8URcSUtEJ9FSAaeZPtnP3Q8cd2xlAfVOELOswKYiaJWAuayoMCJwWe/vBlxa36 uKXQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532rHtG6PKEGdPVd6Crmmvf9jo/a/DcAVkCFMsOjpU8RTLrcKOu6 C28gWj36wrk+qxw0I5Gm52ZrIJYndfGDGt6A8hJj0A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw1Qcet07CeRIUaPr84DM5jChk4Pu2OJaUt6L2+FCLBlTXRrn8OUPyUXunk1Cs3geod1Ys3KOdm+9L+H0FqXvE= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:7ad7:: with SMTP id k23mr28671864ejo.405.1629807603983; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 05:20:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210808192658.284547-1-thomas@monjalon.net> In-Reply-To: From: Lincoln Lavoie Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 08:19:52 -0400 Message-ID: To: David Marchand Cc: dpdklab , Thomas Monjalon , ci@dpdk.org, dev , Ray Kinsella , Aaron Conole , Owen Hilyard Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000049c8d705ca4d2700" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [PATCH] version: 21.11-rc0 X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" --00000000000049c8d705ca4d2700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi David, We'll check. Owen was working on a change to allow ABI to still run for merges onto the 20.11 branch, so the LTS branches can remain stable, while per-patch testing is off for the 21.11 release. Looks like that has a side effect for how these patches were flagged in the system. Cheers, Lincoln On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 3:58 AM David Marchand wrote: > Hello Lincoln, > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 2:04 PM Lincoln Lavoie > wrote: > > > > Hi David, > > > > ABI testing was disable / stopped on Friday in the Community CI lab. > Patches from before that for 21.11 would have still had the test run and > could have failures listed. I'm not sure if there is a way to "remove" > those failure marks from patchworks. But, for all new patches since then, > ABI hasn't been run. > > I can see new reports for ABI, please can someone from UNH double check? > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/18301/ > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/18303/ > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/18325/ > > > -- > David Marchand > > -- *Lincoln Lavoie* Principal Engineer, Broadband Technologies 21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Durham, NH 03824 lylavoie@iol.unh.edu https://www.iol.unh.edu +1-603-674-2755 (m) --00000000000049c8d705ca4d2700 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi = David,

We'll check.= =C2=A0 Owen was working on a change to allow ABI to still run for merges on= to the 20.11 branch, so the LTS branches can remain stable,=C2=A0while per-= patch testing is off for the 21.11 release.=C2=A0 Looks like that has a sid= e effect for how these patches were flagged in the system.=C2=A0

Cheers,
Lincoln

<= div class=3D"gmail_quote">
On Tue, Aug= 24, 2021 at 3:58 AM David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com> wrote:
Hello Lincoln,

On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 2:04 PM Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu> wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> ABI testing was disable / stopped on Friday in the Community CI lab.= =C2=A0 Patches from before that for 21.11 would have still had the test run= and could have failures listed. I'm not sure if there is a way to &quo= t;remove" those failure marks from patchworks.=C2=A0 But, for all new = patches since then, ABI hasn't been run.

I can see new reports for ABI, please can someone from UNH double check? https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchs= ets/18301/
https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchs= ets/18303/
https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchs= ets/18325/


--
David Marchand



--
Lincoln Lavoie
Prin= cipal Engineer, Broadband Technologies
21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, = Durham, NH 03824
+1-603-674-= 2755 (m)

--00000000000049c8d705ca4d2700--