From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D15DBA054D for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 17:25:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABD311CC59B; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 17:25:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-il1-f170.google.com (mail-il1-f170.google.com [209.85.166.170]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74ED91CC59A for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 17:25:48 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-il1-f170.google.com with SMTP id a16so5586411ilq.5 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 08:25:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=LdyEr6Jd9GbrnP2+ImnEGgYkFYetdHrOrqwrrCrkFF8=; b=WnPZeDdqi0Q5BvVnMabF6bOgPEeH0bnY+a3Wee+jKKAKLaaqiRvd7YeVvCOSfzxZmG fQwi1qUZ7C4nTdWHiKe62YDXxEw+5YaYEMholzqVEApqZM6aLFQyUxXMHK/OqNNy69Cv 2YPd5jWZIp2djAZthAZi5P9eN4IciCWROlpZs= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=LdyEr6Jd9GbrnP2+ImnEGgYkFYetdHrOrqwrrCrkFF8=; b=LHh1Cf7gHHyiI4cfi3A0aOkySHwPGcZtzsQYGwcTeO+QfihVJixBQjZ1bDx7TEW/Q/ 7XNt/49mF899m8zbrhi3sIasDQYpv5nVd1u6QiRZ3J3g6cnbI2WpdkyEu+dbet+wTanb ymzTkWsffcjnA4L5tQEA/HZGquR2WKckZYnXKelmGVHzztzSSLoaOx+D9XYgzTa4DWhS Md52TyQEyLfvy41GpmIkUw38cQGHRA7mQwuqmEEpBUBj5iq67rfYj30E836sqgpdNfEK PRJEC99bSIguTi+sXsiBgSwvEAo6wd/oATHw+kvwP59kDTIkZmitdibHMoYJzVDwNKxu EOhQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530crHhgzX1TbjZDQPCn33WztaeP5a1GGng372axYShvz5nMOKpe JZdTLL86nfAqeIvmX0jqZVtVDyOia/40gvmmtzL8ng== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzLCYJlkFq+BQX7RN+igonZLbg2d7iVsD4WS2CFRYcLM8a51cZii/bACVQiRVtKIaYFy6qr2IkhQQNOiH2jFcM= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1a68:: with SMTP id w8mr6411117ilv.147.1613060747784; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 08:25:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Brandon Lo Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 11:25:11 -0500 Message-ID: To: Aaron Conole Cc: "Zawadzki, Tomasz" , Lincoln Lavoie , "dpdklab@iol.unh.edu" , "ci@dpdk.org" , "dev@dpdk.org" , "spdk@lists.01.org" Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="000000000000dfde9e05bb11f859" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdklab] Re: [dpdk-dev] [CI] SPDK compilation failures @ DPDK community lab X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" --000000000000dfde9e05bb11f859 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi Aaron, I have disabled the pipeline. Here is the bug ticket so that we can keep track of the status: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=637 Attached is the dockerfile and the script that it uses to run SPDK compilation. Thanks, Brandon On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 9:02 AM Aaron Conole wrote: > > Brandon Lo writes: > > > Hi again everyone, > > > > I have checked the pipelines with SPDK branch v21.01.x on the main DPDK branch. > > It still seems to have an issue with compilation, and I have attached > > a log of a Fedora SPDK compilation. > > There are some undefined references to "rte_ether_unformat_addr" > > I will continue to look into this. If you have any ideas on how to fix > > this, please let me know. > > Looks like rte_ethdev depends on rte_net - maybe I missed something. > > Brandon, can we disable this test for the time being since it's been > failing for a while now? Can you also send me the container image / > definitions you're using so that I can help work on this? > > > Thanks, > > Brandon > > > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 11:07 AM Brandon Lo wrote: > >> > >> Hi everyone, > >> > >> I will adjust the branches and watch over the first few pipelines to > >> make sure everything goes smoothly. > >> > >> Thanks for the update, > >> Brandon > >> > >> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 10:13 AM Aaron Conole wrote: > >> > > >> > "Zawadzki, Tomasz" writes: > >> > > >> > > Hi Lincoln, > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > That patch in question is now merged to branch v21.01.x. > >> > > > >> > > >> > Good to know - I do still see a failure in the IOL job (even from a few > >> > hours ago). I suppose the lab side might need some adjustment, too? > >> > > >> > > > >> > > The builds performed for latest SPDK and SPDK LTS, against > >> > > dpdk-main branch seem to be passing. Would love to hear if > >> > > this is what you are seeing on your end too. > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > Thanks, > >> > > > >> > > Tomek > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > From: Lincoln Lavoie > >> > > Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 5:21 PM > >> > > To: Zawadzki, Tomasz > >> > > Cc: Aaron Conole ; Brandon Lo > >> > > ; dpdklab@iol.unh.edu; ci@dpdk.org; > >> > > dev@dpdk.org; spdk@lists.01.org > >> > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-dev] [CI] SPDK compilation failures @ DPDK community lab > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > Thanks Tomek, > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > Can you let us know when the merge happens and we'll make sure > >> > > the next set of builds pass or see what the next failure > >> > > is. :-P > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > Cheers, > >> > > Lincoln > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:03 AM Zawadzki, Tomasz wrote: > >> > > > >> > > Hi Aaron, > >> > > > >> > > Thank you for reporting this ! > >> > > > >> > > This is an issue with rte_power now depending on rte_ethdev, which was resolved on latest SPDK. > >> > > > >> > > I believe that UNH lab verifies DPDK patches against SPDK > >> > > branch for latest release. Which after the very recent SPDK > >> > > release, would be v21.01.x: > >> > > https://github.com/spdk/spdk/tree/v21.01.x > >> > > > >> > > The fix has been backported to that branch and should be merged shortly: > >> > > https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/6320 > >> > > > >> > > Thanks, > >> > > Tomek > >> > > > >> > > > -----Original Message----- > >> > > > From: dev On Behalf Of Aaron Conole > >> > > > Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 4:21 PM > >> > > > To: Brandon Lo > >> > > > Cc: dpdklab@iol.unh.edu; ci@dpdk.org; dev@dpdk.org; spdk@lists.01.org > >> > > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [CI] SPDK compilation failures @ DPDK community lab > >> > > > > >> > > > Greetings, > >> > > > > >> > > > I've noticed that recently SPDK compilation in the UNH community lab seems > >> > > > to be failing, and I don't see an obvious reason for the failure. > >> > > > The logs haven't been too helpful - it appears that there is a symbol that isn't > >> > > > available when linking. > >> > > > > >> > > > Job details (for example): > >> > > > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/results/results- > >> > > > uploads/test_runs/2363efb43157465db3228c34c00ebd57/log_upload_file/20 > >> > > > 21/2/dpdk_f6f2d2240153_15524_2021-02-04_22-59-59_NA.zip > >> > > > > >> > > > Is it possible to turn on more verbose logging during the compilation of > >> > > > SPDK? Maybe show the arguments to the compiler for the specific object? > >> > > > Maybe the SPDK folks can see something obviously wrong? > >> > > > > >> > > > Thanks, > >> > > > -Aaron > >> > > >> > >> > >> -- > >> > >> Brandon Lo > >> > >> UNH InterOperability Laboratory > >> > >> 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824 > >> > >> blo@iol.unh.edu > >> > >> www.iol.unh.edu > -- Brandon Lo UNH InterOperability Laboratory 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824 blo@iol.unh.edu www.iol.unh.edu --000000000000dfde9e05bb11f859 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="dpdk_compile.Dockerfile" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="dpdk_compile.Dockerfile" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-ID: X-Attachment-Id: f_kl12o20h0 RlJPTSB1YnVudHU6MTguMDQKCkVOViBERUJJQU5fRlJPTlRFTkQ9bm9uaW50ZXJhY3RpdmUKClJV TiBhcHQtZ2V0IHVwZGF0ZQpSVU4gYXB0LWdldCBpbnN0YWxsIC0tbm8taW5zdGFsbC1yZWNvbW1l bmRzIC15IFwKICAgICMgUmVxdWlyZWQgcGFja2FnZXMKICAgIG1ha2UgZ2NjIG5pbmphLWJ1aWxk IHBrZy1jb25maWcgbGlibnVtYS1kZXYgcHl0aG9uMy1weWVsZnRvb2xzIFwKICAgICMgRXh0cmEg cGFja2FnZXMgdG8gY29tcGlsZSBhcyBtdWNoIGFzIHBvc3NpYmxlCiAgICBsaWJyZG1hY20tZGV2 IGxpYnJkbWFjbTEgcmRtYS1jb3JlIGxpYmVsZi1kZXYgbGlibW5sLWRldiBsaWJwY2FwLWRldiBs aWJjcnlwdG8rKy1kZXYgbGliamFuc3Nvbi1kZXYgXAogICAgIyBNZXNvbiBwYWNrYWdlcwogICAg cHl0aG9uMy1waXAgcHl0aG9uMy1zZXR1cHRvb2xzIHB5dGhvbjMtd2hlZWwKCiMgRXh0cmEgT1ZT IHBhY2thZ2VzClJVTiBhcHQtZ2V0IGluc3RhbGwgLS1uby1pbnN0YWxsLXJlY29tbWVuZHMgLXkg XAogICAgZGgtYXV0b3JlY29uZiBsaWJzc2wtZGV2IGxpYmNhcC1uZy1kZXYgcHl0aG9uMy1zaXgK CiMgRXh0cmEgU1BESyBwYWNrYWdlcwpBREQgaHR0cHM6Ly9yYXcuZ2l0aHVidXNlcmNvbnRlbnQu Y29tL3NwZGsvc3Bkay9tYXN0ZXIvc2NyaXB0cy9wa2dkZXAuc2ggcGtnZGVwLnNoClJVTiBjaG1v ZCAreCBwa2dkZXAuc2ggJiYgLi9wa2dkZXAuc2gKUlVOIGFwdCBpbnN0YWxsIC15IHV1aWQtZGV2 IG5hc20gZysrIGxpYmFpby1kZXYgbGliY3VuaXQxLWRldiBsaWJwbWVtLWRldiBsaWJuY3Vyc2Vz NS1kZXYKCiMgTmVlZCB0aGUgbGF0ZXN0IHZlcnNpb24gb2YgbWVzb24sIHdoaWNoIGN1cnJlbnQg cmVwb3MgZG8gbm90IGhhdmUuClJVTiBweXRob24zIC1tIHBpcCBpbnN0YWxsIG1lc29uCgpDT1BZ IGNvbXBpbGUuc2ggL2NvbXBpbGUuc2gKQ09QWSBjb21waWxlX21lc29uLnNoIC9jb21waWxlX21l c29uLnNoCkNPUFkgY29tcGlsZV9vdnMuc2ggL2NvbXBpbGVfb3ZzLnNoCkNPUFkgY29tcGlsZV9z cGRrLnNoIC9jb21waWxlX3NwZGsuc2gKCkVOViBSVEVfS0VSTkVMRElSIENIQU5HRV9NRQo= --000000000000dfde9e05bb11f859 Content-Type: application/x-sh; name="compile_spdk.sh" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="compile_spdk.sh" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-ID: X-Attachment-Id: f_kl12o7l01 IyEvYmluL2Jhc2ggLWV4CiMgU1BEWC1MaWNlbnNlLUlkZW50aWZpZXI6IEJTRC0zLUNsYXVzZQoj IFRoaXMgc2NyaXB0IGlzIG9ubHkgdXNlZCB0byBydW4gaW5zaWRlIGEgY29udGFpbmVyIGFzIHRo ZSBFTlRSWVBPSU5ULgpjZCBzcGRrCgouL2NvbmZpZ3VyZSAtLXdpdGgtZHBkaz0vZHBkay9idWls ZCAtLWVuYWJsZS13ZXJyb3IgLS13aXRob3V0LXZob3N0Ck1BS0VfUEFVU0U9biBtYWtlIGNsZWFu Ck1BS0VfUEFVU0U9biBtYWtlIC1qJChucHJvYykK --000000000000dfde9e05bb11f859--