I mean config “build_type=meson” in DTS/execution.cfg, Snice DPDK don’t support “make” now, we have to use meson build.
From: ci <ci-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Tu, Lijuan
Sent: 2020年10月20日 21:40
To: Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu>; Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>; Chen, Zhaoyan <zhaoyan.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>; ci@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] Building TestPMD in DPDK
Did you use meson build ?
From: Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu>
Sent: 2020年10月20日 21:19
To: Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>; Tu, Lijuan <lijuan.tu@intel.com>; Chen, Zhaoyan <zhaoyan.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>; ci@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] Building TestPMD in DPDK
I think this should be brought up to the DTS maintainers.
DTS' initial behavior is to build DPDK/testpmd, and it assumes that testpmd is in the build's output directory.
Thanks,
Brandon
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 8:38 AM Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu> wrote:
Is this because of the change that adds some python requirements to testpmd? I remember seeing something about that go by on the lists.
Cheers,
Lincoln
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 8:34 AM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
20/10/2020 14:31, Brandon Lo:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Is there a new method to build the testpmd application in DPDK?
>
> Using the latest patches, any job in the CI that uses DTS to compile
> DPDK and run functional/performance tests are failing because it is
> not building testpmd.
> We are also using the latest commit available for DTS.
No testpmd should be built.
--
Lincoln Lavoie
Senior Engineer, Broadband Technologies
21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Durham, NH 03824
+1-603-674-2755 (m)
--
Brandon Lo
UNH InterOperability Laboratory
21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824