From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 629F1A0A0C for ; Thu, 20 May 2021 17:31:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5007B41100; Thu, 20 May 2021 17:31:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-io1-f53.google.com (mail-io1-f53.google.com [209.85.166.53]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D06740143 for ; Thu, 20 May 2021 17:31:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-io1-f53.google.com with SMTP id h23so833511ioj.5 for ; Thu, 20 May 2021 08:31:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=JHHnsosmlQz24l7I+/LBFrWNnYR8u7DxYlernM18o1U=; b=W1aDb00P7zHHmZQk3i5L7W5eR5JqzSFWJWLrMmWnaLn0wfqN0VYsxim9aCJR1ZkVei Wl5JIYEeTG7iNhcYdqB+/8qet2PJqkHw3v/qDPIGq/itENCRsdSd7htpaDvBux1N6tgo T0o40xUNTtRgr6M7FYjZWaXVdKOkWzQIAGzv0= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=JHHnsosmlQz24l7I+/LBFrWNnYR8u7DxYlernM18o1U=; b=Ca2kZcMdhgziLELl3ragreqfP+tn33VFYCWvt2QBhsUpmjD8JCzyvkdNPsOInAfh3u uTIuSjlquT5gRsSXOY8lnYOsMcO0pPyjRawHuIy3papfEIXVhs3Z/W3w07LcK5Rx/jPw p7R0mp5MPXoHXbH7XSYemBBMe374IpmvF1KCBBnu7ySGcJPSM5kOv6eUzvFDam0GRzt/ mshaNEMvD9wdTJ2ljbrjCvBvb6gaM2bPkg4HogIyipHexcbsSwgxIcmfwO9bWGXRRv5n /2EEa4m0GHaDk+jBjIijoau3hsM7HWZ3oGDouD7FV4OkoM6v2y+9Lgo5vUhvRCZbZ0hM MpFw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532nWedeh1ZCKdFrPSYoP0ZLzqAG5iAgJahOd1VRgffk764tmXRZ k/ndIaPu0hmz4ypOKNhhzsEhae4kSsk7fwfyCBixoA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxosVlI04cSCyyzTfz1ulVqmyMsHD+ZQ0WUpB8YPaGxPBSCbXkzKSPQZx2XIiXh2zwYuoDHCKlNwOwUuXKWEtI= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:3b4c:: with SMTP id i73mr6220096ioa.149.1621524668590; Thu, 20 May 2021 08:31:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1905198.ZecszVm5bm@thomas> In-Reply-To: From: Brandon Lo Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 11:30:32 -0400 Message-ID: To: David Marchand Cc: Thomas Monjalon , Owen Hilyard , dev , ci@dpdk.org, Akhil Goyal , Aaron Conole Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] dpdk-next-crypto/master is failing tests X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" Hi David, Sorry for the late reply. This may be due to the configuration with Jenkins on our side. If I do not see that next-virtio and next-crypto are in Jenkins, I can definitely add it in. Thanks, Brandon On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 9:54 AM David Marchand wrote: > > On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 6:15 PM Brandon Lo wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > dpdk-next-qos and dpdk-next-pipeline remotes have been removed. > > dpdk-next-virtio and dpdk-next-crypto remotes have been switched to > > track main and for-main branches respectively. > > Thank you Brandon. > > Just an additional question. > > In the lab dashboard, I can find status/test reports for the most > repositories, like main, next-net, next-net-intel. > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/tarballs/ > > But I can't find next-virtio or next-crypto. > Are they tested / supposed to land in this part of the dashboard? > > > -- > David Marchand > -- Brandon Lo UNH InterOperability Laboratory 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824 blo@iol.unh.edu www.iol.unh.edu