From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90997A0350 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 15:20:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58E54FEB; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 15:20:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-io1-f49.google.com (mail-io1-f49.google.com [209.85.166.49]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CCC023D for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 15:20:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-io1-f49.google.com with SMTP id a12so5970589ion.13 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 06:20:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=+UGH0TaPhMlXl+naESmR1Gx7oyS6lqCo8Crf2vALKP8=; b=RULKWsLK2nYBNYCXgYNbXXJDTZG047BJa8vZIlWO0EM7j1ywSfdh08wwyHK1pVkQsQ DdeACiIe/wEf+MC4zVkCNujGX960mJ8TclMLrPBYvwMRmpKfXTYf2c2GhMbOTuN88wVn H2Fg5alwrUa0lD2dIkOyxEMzbImWUqRwbSi90= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=+UGH0TaPhMlXl+naESmR1Gx7oyS6lqCo8Crf2vALKP8=; b=gVvd+UOv3y/0W8MZqPy6fXU8XNv2TNZNC1XncP/4KaLineq1GgmwEGg/RvsDc+NkFB rCF9KDl03jhfvjBmkU94VoNtMePBHTWI2H1PRXtvNhOgnJR1x9gDIarVsKxDuJfXheED kbAjHuKhrcZay+9GDxaVbUhiXYvQJzaHg0r6e7WuejjvLaFZXCnhROZXqiG1W0ru9g2c a9Hitwc+woS8do4MOIWb3RSO+d5pMsHNc0tjQ8t54VzCDHA8FFiz8ox+Sad0/bXVHVEB 7BExKLf43TChQy9yrnCi+M5cMVgXY9AB1C5zkUmbm5k+9+eZurhZQm+0OLQydzBtyfED YJ7g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532aafLZY9wU66M4HZBlE0Kkal3aiRplbTIyOkqBoYiljj+1pUAl 8UgZHenJU3dOh23kG1HndckXJGKjJ/lqZM5M9olbpAWpN54= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwZXbKVdNJb2W5qajdZUxIxTl4ZXnE+zhzxQIZYG3j+3Z2GRvyUCQ6Xa0xMx3Aai/OajL4uU7UoXkKqnRPfjJs= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:9505:: with SMTP id d5mr37987624iom.34.1593091246939; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 06:20:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Brandon Lo Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 09:20:10 -0400 Message-ID: To: ci@dpdk.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000de73ea05a8e875e6" Subject: [dpdk-ci] Windows Mingw-w64 Compilation Testing - Now in Production X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" --000000000000de73ea05a8e875e6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi everyone, We have just started testing patchsets on Windows using Mingw-w64. The test case is labeled as: *dpdk_mingw64_compile* The instructions that are followed can be found here: https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/windows_gsg/build_dpdk.html The VM has installed Mingw-w64 and set the path to include the mingw binary files. It runs the meson and ninja commands from part 3.6 in the Windows guide to perform compile testing. If there are any issues with the test case and how it is run, feel free to let me know. I will also keep my eyes out for any failures. Thanks, Brandon -- Brandon Lo UNH InterOperability Laboratory 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824 blo@iol.unh.edu www.iol.unh.edu --000000000000de73ea05a8e875e6 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi everyone,

We have just started testi= ng patchsets on Windows using Mingw-w64.
The test case is labeled= as: dpdk_mingw64_compile

The instructions = that are followed can be found here:=C2=A0https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/windows_gsg/= build_dpdk.html
The VM has installed Mingw-w64 and set the pa= th to include the mingw binary files.
It runs the meson and ninja= commands from part 3.6 in the Windows guide to perform compile testing.

If there are any issues with the test case and how i= t is run, feel free to let me know.
I will also keep my eyes out = for any failures.

Thanks,
Brandon
<= div>--

Brandon Lo

UNH InterOperabil= ity Laboratory

21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824

blo@iol.unh.edu

www.iol.unh.edu

--000000000000de73ea05a8e875e6-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EF10A0350 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 17:18:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82F7ACF3; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 17:18:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 921C42AB for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 17:18:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AA7B5C010D; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 11:18:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 25 Jun 2020 11:18:27 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= hxs6CddgDBAlZ5MFu7gDruxAazBMqj0qCPU0Fj73xTE=; b=dx9dHfwMvNngI33l NIQEKT/8F6H5jB41QQthOOzweuLCHwCAnS5Z9jp1/kYNDFLn8IXfv9Jy8li3+Tgv 8Hl2MUwqPI+64vMaoqyzc7wVce18t84BAIL0gkElCoCcm3Gmrvr3UIVr4Qkj9lYD LC58ArPx4Ow1HDuxF5hisY6lr2OOIAyeeb1OM+/ZWhkv6SEyuVzx3I+adc0hmKNh NR/JyNcFxw/KCDg83NzRmi1lL9Q2LsDP3LAgGKbujBqiHUk3mvFLxm8wHaEVohSU RTKBzmx5F8ckfNXvTNbgbrkDpAJTihoj3pFHxCwM2m7WPvExD3evY0+8EromfcmU BOHX0Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=hxs6CddgDBAlZ5MFu7gDruxAazBMqj0qCPU0Fj73x TE=; b=Dj1cR9ErRwu3H9rbWiYu1F8vPpfryPmya7M1WOMTWu7ZJO5mNFf48oPg4 996286vDUXUVBvZU/+QgLxVjTLx8xiRhhQ8BjDUZo6/TQLQSyzPXPpk7pZLOuAP3 dv5eQAXpYsVrloVfKsquEYG8t7hBLj4FLxROXzTXnAP5kalGZ2Kgi/E5/v1F/tzg hKEsaR6Z41rSWJMH+ypkktcWLbVa8VLcx1f8KZXtJzWEWsmgsyFAzcKeudKZdYax 9y61RCiJ5v8SY9rUrFxFe3oxeSBdmlo1VSf0BdJcfyx2JAvYrRl5NR357INjXg+9 IdVtRUb6NWCH9AuL4uO5o1DRpEwEg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrudekledgkeekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepffdvffejueetleefieeludduuefgteejleevfeekjeefieegheet ffdvkeefgedunecuffhomhgrihhnpeguphgukhdrohhrghenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrd dvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhf rhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 06F2D3067761; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 11:18:25 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Brandon Lo Cc: ci@dpdk.org Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 17:18:23 +0200 Message-ID: <318963625.T9AhtUn35N@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] Windows Mingw-w64 Compilation Testing - Now in Production X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" 25/06/2020 15:20, Brandon Lo: > Hi everyone, > > We have just started testing patchsets on Windows using Mingw-w64. > The test case is labeled as: *dpdk_mingw64_compile* > > The instructions that are followed can be found here: > https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/windows_gsg/build_dpdk.html > The VM has installed Mingw-w64 and set the path to include the mingw binary > files. > It runs the meson and ninja commands from part 3.6 in the Windows guide to > perform compile testing. > > If there are any issues with the test case and how it is run, feel free to > let me know. > I will also keep my eyes out for any failures. Good, thank you. When the patch for thread handle fix will be merged, Windows will be able to compile without any warning. Then you should test compilation with the meson option --werror please, so any warning will be a failure. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1F9AA0350 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 17:52:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 931BFE07; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 17:52:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-io1-f46.google.com (mail-io1-f46.google.com [209.85.166.46]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B26F5CF3 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 17:52:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-io1-f46.google.com with SMTP id m81so6600117ioa.1 for ; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 08:52:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=kN1dSNm/fUNhG2pQK2Uuv/D3c9PLns1jX1DBPdNYCtE=; b=Oe5iNr4fX7V63exMdcKTGj6kyehbNxcFJP68tQMP6K7xgPnonkkp2g66ks97Yc3HUD hb3OIGScbeLrdkDuQsXbWPHMeK/PU+hY1OQ4okScUMRyBQIOyrPxtyc0cOEzX3ETfqmh JiphajdN3lv4ECuKb0wjM7SkBjl75DRAavSms= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kN1dSNm/fUNhG2pQK2Uuv/D3c9PLns1jX1DBPdNYCtE=; b=g4zyNqZqYXMEcM4i8VE0lYID+gAXnScKmOmaMovkLXB/pyLDIkFLchC3UlWhlBa25b URXKPSibYfRN5L7QFRdWgUTTKD37bzh4gG/mMgEUC5yNPrH51jPGZK03mX+xvxlaoWmJ SjYyxOZQKr8ss/aKIR0DIr5izGFWi3Ny4LC3LxSI7TGzEUuLZg4q9pF811szsA0pcQzx 9fUblFGPNDjGZnMRnegEvvTtPYozdjZ/Il88Px6X8K24FCJOVDerTWwILkBbW+C8TTGY 8KkBvnVlXGTdDSkgBKtXrDj4CIGVlpVeTyqRCeumNGh5qBosCjMxtCrnbxC/3KdUlYbf zuTQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530c46E8SfvWmKIsOTdn88jtrQq4xBIrr2rjho6bBM+4U9Qr/EQd FH280TLq9DkiB99AM/6CCPShLiavwGZ578ZMNv1pJZSv X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwF25PpqoDiJ0Q/54rXfZ0kvtU2tqM79EHTtZVcagHA/U83f5JNdlqgENh5Rbi4R3reZn93rRqHgLFvl2DsxkI= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:9505:: with SMTP id d5mr38799326iom.34.1593100350648; Thu, 25 Jun 2020 08:52:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <318963625.T9AhtUn35N@thomas> In-Reply-To: <318963625.T9AhtUn35N@thomas> From: Brandon Lo Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2020 11:51:54 -0400 Message-ID: To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: ci@dpdk.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007e110505a8ea940f" Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] Windows Mingw-w64 Compilation Testing - Now in Production X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" --0000000000007e110505a8ea940f Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi Thomas, Thank you for the update. I will look out for that fix and enable the flag. Thanks, Brandon On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 11:18 AM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 25/06/2020 15:20, Brandon Lo: > > Hi everyone, > > > > We have just started testing patchsets on Windows using Mingw-w64. > > The test case is labeled as: *dpdk_mingw64_compile* > > > > The instructions that are followed can be found here: > > https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/windows_gsg/build_dpdk.html > > The VM has installed Mingw-w64 and set the path to include the mingw > binary > > files. > > It runs the meson and ninja commands from part 3.6 in the Windows guide > to > > perform compile testing. > > > > If there are any issues with the test case and how it is run, feel free > to > > let me know. > > I will also keep my eyes out for any failures. > > Good, thank you. > > When the patch for thread handle fix will be merged, > Windows will be able to compile without any warning. > Then you should test compilation with the meson option --werror please, > so any warning will be a failure. > > > -- Brandon Lo UNH InterOperability Laboratory 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824 blo@iol.unh.edu www.iol.unh.edu --0000000000007e110505a8ea940f Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Thomas,

= Thank you for the update.
I will look out for that fix and enable= the flag.

Thanks,
Brandon
On Thu, = Jun 25, 2020 at 11:18 AM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
25/06/2020 15:20, Brandon Lo:
> Hi everyone,
>
> We have just started testing patchsets on Windows using Mingw-w64.
> The test case is labeled as: *dpdk_mingw64_compile*
>
> The instructions that are followed can be found here:
> https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/windows_gsg/= build_dpdk.html
> The VM has installed Mingw-w64 and set the path to include the mingw b= inary
> files.
> It runs the meson and ninja commands from part 3.6 in the Windows guid= e to
> perform compile testing.
>
> If there are any issues with the test case and how it is run, feel fre= e to
> let me know.
> I will also keep my eyes out for any failures.

Good, thank you.

When the patch for thread handle fix will be merged,
Windows will be able to compile without any warning.
Then you should test compilation with the meson option --werror please,
so any warning will be a failure.




--

Brandon Lo

UNH = InterOperability Laboratory

21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824

blo@iol.unh.edu

<= a href=3D"http://www.iol.unh.edu/" target=3D"_blank">www.iol.unh.edu

--0000000000007e110505a8ea940f--