DPDK CI discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jie Zhou <jizh@microsoft.com>
To: David Liu <dliu@iol.unh.edu>, Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>, "ci@dpdk.org" <ci@dpdk.org>,
	Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu>, Owen Hilyard <ohilyard@iol.unh.edu>,
	Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [EXTERNAL] Re: Help with a rerun of failed ci/iol-intel-functional
Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 20:38:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <MWHPR21MB01438F6EF8C59F939E5E566FD0579@MWHPR21MB0143.namprd21.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAuqQpRYLicuZLSRnxn5cq1bCRophpjOhZVGksee4bcdZiHp5Q@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6167 bytes --]

Thank you David for helping with the rerun! The dashboard now is updated and the previous failed test passed: [v13,10/10] app/testpmd: enable building testpmd on Windows - Patchwork (dpdk.org)<http://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/1620241931-28435-11-git-send-email-jizh@linux.microsoft.com/>.

+ Ferruh just FYI on the current test results as this patch set is delegated to you.

Thanks.

Jie

From: David Liu <dliu@iol.unh.edu>
Sent: Friday, May 7, 2021 1:30 PM
To: Jie Zhou <jizh@microsoft.com>
Cc: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>; ci@dpdk.org; Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu>; Owen Hilyard <ohilyard@iol.unh.edu>; Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [EXTERNAL] Re: Help with a rerun of failed ci/iol-intel-functional

Hi,

The rerun has been kick off.

The test result on the patchwork will be updated shortly.

Thank,
David

On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 12:26 PM Jie Zhou <jizh@microsoft.com<mailto:jizh@microsoft.com>> wrote:
Thanks Aaron!

-----Original Message-----
From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com<mailto:aconole@redhat.com>>
Sent: Friday, May 7, 2021 5:47 AM
To: Jie Zhou <jizh@microsoft.com<mailto:jizh@microsoft.com>>
Cc: ci@dpdk.org<mailto:ci@dpdk.org>; Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu<mailto:blo@iol.unh.edu>>; Owen Hilyard <ohilyard@iol.unh.edu<mailto:ohilyard@iol.unh.edu>>; Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu<mailto:lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [dpdk-ci] Help with a rerun of failed ci/iol-intel-functional

Jie Zhou <jizh@microsoft.com<mailto:jizh@microsoft.com>> writes:

> Hi,
>
>
>
> This patchset
> (https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fpatc
> hwork.dpdk.org<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fhwork.dpdk.org%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cjizh%40microsoft.com%7Caa8ebdae8b5e410828c208d911970561%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637560162608195912%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=BCmbFYYz6UzMvQATiUTBV5S38xK3PfHNv2nihSvY5%2Bg%3D&reserved=0>%2Fproject%2Fdpdk%2Fpatch%2F1620241931-28435-11-git-send
> -email-jizh%40linux.microsoft.com<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40linux.microsoft.com%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cjizh%40microsoft.com%7Caa8ebdae8b5e410828c208d911970561%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637560162608195912%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=1JGX%2B1MpigA9YSLmhMDVl3Q%2FWbjdQwsl%2BpQ5Q52%2Fgbo%3D&reserved=0>%2F&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cjizh%40microso
> ft.com<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fft.com%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cjizh%40microsoft.com%7Caa8ebdae8b5e410828c208d911970561%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637560162608205911%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=hMIsgOphwv6W6nVg5hQC%2Fyror%2Fx7L4bZ41HslOFszhw%3D&reserved=0>%7C312abec10018483bdbea08d911565a50%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd0
> 11db47%7C1%7C0%7C637559884846642838%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC
> 4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sd
> ata=FOtKE7%2BzuGhSR1uIZSCdvnKJ31oQgq1o6RE6U1KuGno%3D&amp;reserved=0)
> hit CI lab test failure on ci/iol-intel-functional
> (https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flab
> .dpdk.org<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fdpdk.org%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cjizh%40microsoft.com%7Caa8ebdae8b5e410828c208d911970561%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637560162608215906%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=zDLnsqk%2FM8gL%2F53zAHmzVstStAQqUrkr5Mfgo2%2Fjxuc%3D&reserved=0>%2Fresults%2Fdashboard%2Fpatchsets%2F16955%2F&amp;data=04%7C0
> 1%7Cjizh%40microsoft.com<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2F40microsoft.com%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cjizh%40microsoft.com%7Caa8ebdae8b5e410828c208d911970561%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637560162608225899%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=o%2FWz4F7HoGksv%2FMiD0UXeBYL0KJolP2TSRw0jHIcQIs%3D&reserved=0>%7C312abec10018483bdbea08d911565a50%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637559884846652833%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=74kKnF9U1d%2Fy10TqMkDZE4kdiVCtZbWkWz4R7KJWS4Y%3D&amp;reserved=0). Per looking at the log, don't see how that is related to the change from this patchset (previous versions passed this test and this V13 just trivially resolve a header file 1 line patch apply conflict). Wondering if is it possible that you help with rerun this test for the patchset to see the failure is intermittent or not? Appreciate your help!

I see errors like:

------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/scapy/supersocket.py", line 134, in __del__
    self.close()
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/scapy/arch/linux.py", line 514, in close
    set_promisc(self.ins, self.iface, 0)
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/scapy/arch/linux.py", line 165, in set_promisc
    mreq = struct.pack("IHH8s", get_if_index(iff), PACKET_MR_PROMISC, 0, b"")
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/scapy/arch/linux.py", line 380, in get_if_index
    return int(struct.unpack("I", get_if(iff, SIOCGIFINDEX)[16:20])[0])
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/scapy/arch/common.py", line 59, in get_if
    ifreq = ioctl(sck, cmd, struct.pack("16s16x", iff.encode("utf8")))
OSError: [Errno 19] No such device

------------------------------------
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/pexpect/spawnbase.py", line 166, in read_nonblocking
    s = os.read(self.child_fd, size)
OSError: [Errno 5] Input/output error

------------------------------------
Looks like it's something in the infrastructure or configuration of the HW.  CC'd the lab folks.

>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> Jie

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 10241 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2021-05-07 20:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-06 22:35 [dpdk-ci] " Jie Zhou
2021-05-07 12:47 ` Aaron Conole
2021-05-07 16:26   ` [dpdk-ci] [EXTERNAL] " Jie Zhou
2021-05-07 20:30     ` David Liu
2021-05-07 20:38       ` Jie Zhou [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=MWHPR21MB01438F6EF8C59F939E5E566FD0579@MWHPR21MB0143.namprd21.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=jizh@microsoft.com \
    --cc=aconole@redhat.com \
    --cc=blo@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=ci@dpdk.org \
    --cc=dliu@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=lylavoie@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=ohilyard@iol.unh.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).