Thank you David for helping with the rerun! The dashboard now is updated and the previous failed test passed: [v13,10/10] app/testpmd: enable building testpmd on Windows - Patchwork (dpdk.org).
+ Ferruh just FYI on the current test results as this patch set is delegated to you.
Thanks.
Jie
From: David Liu
Sent: Friday, May 7, 2021 1:30 PM
To: Jie Zhou
Cc: Aaron Conole ; ci@dpdk.org; Brandon Lo ; Owen Hilyard ; Lincoln Lavoie
Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [EXTERNAL] Re: Help with a rerun of failed ci/iol-intel-functional
Hi,
The rerun has been kick off.
The test result on the patchwork will be updated shortly.
Thank,
David
On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 12:26 PM Jie Zhou > wrote:
Thanks Aaron!
-----Original Message-----
From: Aaron Conole >
Sent: Friday, May 7, 2021 5:47 AM
To: Jie Zhou >
Cc: ci@dpdk.org; Brandon Lo >; Owen Hilyard >; Lincoln Lavoie >
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [dpdk-ci] Help with a rerun of failed ci/iol-intel-functional
Jie Zhou > writes:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> This patchset
> (https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fpatc
> hwork.dpdk.org%2Fproject%2Fdpdk%2Fpatch%2F1620241931-28435-11-git-send
> -email-jizh%40linux.microsoft.com%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cjizh%40microso
> ft.com%7C312abec10018483bdbea08d911565a50%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd0
> 11db47%7C1%7C0%7C637559884846642838%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC
> 4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sd
> ata=FOtKE7%2BzuGhSR1uIZSCdvnKJ31oQgq1o6RE6U1KuGno%3D&reserved=0)
> hit CI lab test failure on ci/iol-intel-functional
> (https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flab
> .dpdk.org%2Fresults%2Fdashboard%2Fpatchsets%2F16955%2F&data=04%7C0
> 1%7Cjizh%40microsoft.com%7C312abec10018483bdbea08d911565a50%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637559884846652833%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=74kKnF9U1d%2Fy10TqMkDZE4kdiVCtZbWkWz4R7KJWS4Y%3D&reserved=0). Per looking at the log, don't see how that is related to the change from this patchset (previous versions passed this test and this V13 just trivially resolve a header file 1 line patch apply conflict). Wondering if is it possible that you help with rerun this test for the patchset to see the failure is intermittent or not? Appreciate your help!
I see errors like:
------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/scapy/supersocket.py", line 134, in __del__
self.close()
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/scapy/arch/linux.py", line 514, in close
set_promisc(self.ins, self.iface, 0)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/scapy/arch/linux.py", line 165, in set_promisc
mreq = struct.pack("IHH8s", get_if_index(iff), PACKET_MR_PROMISC, 0, b"")
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/scapy/arch/linux.py", line 380, in get_if_index
return int(struct.unpack("I", get_if(iff, SIOCGIFINDEX)[16:20])[0])
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/scapy/arch/common.py", line 59, in get_if
ifreq = ioctl(sck, cmd, struct.pack("16s16x", iff.encode("utf8")))
OSError: [Errno 19] No such device
------------------------------------
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/dist-packages/pexpect/spawnbase.py", line 166, in read_nonblocking
s = os.read(self.child_fd, size)
OSError: [Errno 5] Input/output error
------------------------------------
Looks like it's something in the infrastructure or configuration of the HW. CC'd the lab folks.
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> Jie