[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 295 bytes --] Hi, I'm an engineer from DPDK project. I've sent a patch set to the community. And the ci check has not made any progress for more than a day, so I want to ask if there is a problem. Here is the link: http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/86366/ Looking forward to your reply. Thanks. Cheng [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2348 bytes --]
"Jiang, Cheng1" <cheng1.jiang@intel.com> writes: > Hi, > > > > I’m an engineer from DPDK project. > > I’ve sent a patch set to the community. And the ci check has not made any progress for more than a day, so I > want to ask if there is a problem. From the 0day robot, I see the following error: error: sha1 information is lacking or useless (examples/vhost/main.c). error: could not build fake ancestor hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch' to see the failed patch Patch failed at 0001 examples/vhost: refactor vhost data path When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue". If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead. To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort". So, looks like it didn't apply. Which tree is this based on? > Here is the link: > > http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/86366/ > > > > Looking forward to your reply. > > Thanks. > > Cheng
Hi,
Thanks a lot.
This patch set is based on dpdk-next-virtio tree. And it applied well in my environment.
It has passed some checks on the patchwork by the way. If it can't be applied, then how could this happened? Really strange.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2021 10:12 PM
> To: Jiang, Cheng1 <cheng1.jiang@intel.com>
> Cc: ci@dpdk.org; Xia, Chenbo <chenbo.xia@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] CI work status check
>
> "Jiang, Cheng1" <cheng1.jiang@intel.com> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> >
> > I’m an engineer from DPDK project.
> >
> > I’ve sent a patch set to the community. And the ci check has not made
> > any progress for more than a day, so I want to ask if there is a problem.
>
> From the 0day robot, I see the following error:
>
> error: sha1 information is lacking or useless (examples/vhost/main.c).
> error: could not build fake ancestor
> hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch' to see the failed patch
> Patch failed at 0001 examples/vhost: refactor vhost data path
> When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
> If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
> To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
>
> So, looks like it didn't apply. Which tree is this based on?
>
> > Here is the link:
> >
> > http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/86366/
> >
> >
> >
> > Looking forward to your reply.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Cheng
"Jiang, Cheng1" <cheng1.jiang@intel.com> writes: > Hi, > > Thanks a lot. > This patch set is based on dpdk-next-virtio tree. And it applied well in my environment. > It has passed some checks on the patchwork by the way. If it can't be > applied, then how could this happened? Really strange. I guess that's probably what happened here. The DPDK 0-day robot has difficulty right now to guess the right tree to apply against. Nothing 'wrong' here on your side. I will look at this closer and see if I can get it working better. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com> >> Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2021 10:12 PM >> To: Jiang, Cheng1 <cheng1.jiang@intel.com> >> Cc: ci@dpdk.org; Xia, Chenbo <chenbo.xia@intel.com> >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] CI work status check >> >> "Jiang, Cheng1" <cheng1.jiang@intel.com> writes: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > >> > >> > I’m an engineer from DPDK project. >> > >> > I’ve sent a patch set to the community. And the ci check has not made >> > any progress for more than a day, so I want to ask if there is a problem. >> >> From the 0day robot, I see the following error: >> >> error: sha1 information is lacking or useless (examples/vhost/main.c). >> error: could not build fake ancestor >> hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch' to see the failed patch >> Patch failed at 0001 examples/vhost: refactor vhost data path >> When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue". >> If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead. >> To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort". >> >> So, looks like it didn't apply. Which tree is this based on? >> >> > Here is the link: >> > >> > http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/86366/ >> > >> > >> > >> > Looking forward to your reply. >> > >> > Thanks. >> > >> > Cheng
Sure, thanks a lot.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
> Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2021 11:38 PM
> To: Jiang, Cheng1 <cheng1.jiang@intel.com>
> Cc: ci@dpdk.org; Xia, Chenbo <chenbo.xia@intel.com>; Hu, Jiayu
> <jiayu.hu@intel.com>; Yang, YvonneX <yvonnex.yang@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] CI work status check
>
> "Jiang, Cheng1" <cheng1.jiang@intel.com> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks a lot.
> > This patch set is based on dpdk-next-virtio tree. And it applied well in my
> environment.
> > It has passed some checks on the patchwork by the way. If it can't be
> > applied, then how could this happened? Really strange.
>
> I guess that's probably what happened here. The DPDK 0-day robot has
> difficulty right now to guess the right tree to apply against. Nothing 'wrong'
> here on your side. I will look at this closer and see if I can get it working
> better.
>
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
> >> Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2021 10:12 PM
> >> To: Jiang, Cheng1 <cheng1.jiang@intel.com>
> >> Cc: ci@dpdk.org; Xia, Chenbo <chenbo.xia@intel.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] CI work status check
> >>
> >> "Jiang, Cheng1" <cheng1.jiang@intel.com> writes:
> >>
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I’m an engineer from DPDK project.
> >> >
> >> > I’ve sent a patch set to the community. And the ci check has not
> >> > made any progress for more than a day, so I want to ask if there is a
> problem.
> >>
> >> From the 0day robot, I see the following error:
> >>
> >> error: sha1 information is lacking or useless (examples/vhost/main.c).
> >> error: could not build fake ancestor
> >> hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch' to see the failed patch
> >> Patch failed at 0001 examples/vhost: refactor vhost data path
> >> When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
> >> If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
> >> To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
> >>
> >> So, looks like it didn't apply. Which tree is this based on?
> >>
> >> > Here is the link:
> >> >
> >> > http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/86366/
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Looking forward to your reply.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks.
> >> >
> >> > Cheng