From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id 999901B112; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 18:13:57 +0100 (CET) From: bugzilla@dpdk.org To: ci@dpdk.org Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 17:13:57 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: lab X-Bugzilla-Component: dashboard X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ferruh.yigit@intel.com X-Bugzilla-Status: CONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ci@dpdk.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.dpdk.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [dpdk-ci] [Bug 210] Patches with dependency fails to apply X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 17:13:57 -0000 https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D210 Bug ID: 210 Summary: Patches with dependency fails to apply Product: lab Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: CONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: Normal Component: dashboard Assignee: ci@dpdk.org Reporter: ferruh.yigit@intel.com CC: jplsek@iol.unh.edu Target Milestone: --- This is a placeholder for "dependency resolving between patches improvement= ", so not really a defect of the lab. For example in the task: https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/4552/ The patchset cover letter clearly documents the dependencies: https://patches.dpdk.org/cover/50255/ " This patchset depends on following patches: [1] - "[v3] cryptodev: rework mod exp and mod inv comments" (http://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/50139/) [2] - "openssl: fix bad reference of modinv" (http://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/50131/) " What about having a defined format on cover letters for dependencies so that lab or any automated system can process them and resolve the dependencies? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=