DPDK CI discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bugzilla@dpdk.org
To: ci@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-ci] [Bug 431] Missing performance results in Patchwork checks, and possible false positives
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 16:34:16 +0000
Message-ID: <bug-431-149-4FGhPx6sus@http.bugs.dpdk.org/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-431-149@http.bugs.dpdk.org/>


Brandon Lo (blo@iol.unh.edu) changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
             Status|IN_PROGRESS                 |RESOLVED

--- Comment #5 from Brandon Lo (blo@iol.unh.edu) ---

This issue is due to concurrent running tests.

Our internal testing job would run a job to send a performance report email to
vendors for a given patch. The problem is that this email would be sent after
all of a given vendor's machines are done testing (vendor A), but it could
occur before all of the machines of another vendor finishes (vendor B). 

This results in all of the results from the first vendor (A) being sent, but
the internal script will pick up the existing results created by the unfinished
vendor B and send those out as well.

This can be seen with email timings. An unfinished Mellanox report email could
have one single testbed's result in the email, and it will always be sent at
the same time as another vendor's email (Intel for example). 

The fix was to add support for sending a specific vendor's email only when all
of the given vendor's testbeds are finished testing. 
We have tested this by using dry runs of the email sending script with
successful separation of vendor testbed results.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-04-22 16:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-31 14:42 bugzilla
2020-04-19 13:31 ` Ali Alnubani
2020-04-22 16:34 ` bugzilla [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-431-149-4FGhPx6sus@http.bugs.dpdk.org/ \
    --to=bugzilla@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ci@dpdk.org \


* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK CI discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/ci/0 ci/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 ci ci/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/ci \
	public-inbox-index ci

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:

AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git