DPDK CI discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
To: "Juraj Linkeš" <juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech>
Cc: "ci\@dpdk.org" <ci@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] OBS pull request in pw-ci
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 16:17:50 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f7t365vw4nl.fsf@dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <65dd0476a54b4252834a129cf0942d1a@pantheon.tech> ("Juraj \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Linke\=C5\=A1\=22's\?\= message of "Mon, 13 Jul 2020 14:20:12 +0000")

Juraj Linkeš <juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech> writes:

> Hi Aaron,
>
> Have you had a chance to look at the pull request?

Only a bit.  I will do something more thorough on Wednesday.

> Thanks,
> Juraj
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
>> Sent: Monday, July 6, 2020 7:32 PM
>> To: Juraj Linkeš <juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech>
>> Cc: ci@dpdk.org
>> Subject: Re: OBS pull request in pw-ci
>> 
>> Juraj Linkeš <juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech> writes:
>> 
>> > Hi folks,
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > I've submitted a PR with OBS changes to pw-ci:
>> > https://github.com/orgcandman/pw-ci/pull/12
>> 
>> Cool!  I'll take a look.  I was on PTO, so didn't get a chance yet.
>> 
>> >
>> >
>> > I have a couple of points/questions:
>> >
>> > ·        The scripts are using
>> https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/home:bluca:dpdk/dpdk to fork the
>> debian and
>> > redhat spec and control files.
>> 
>> Okay.  A quick look shows that it's configurable, though.  Should be okay.  I refer
>> to:
>> 
>> https://github.com/orgcandman/pw-
>> ci/pull/12/commits/93f6baa497c85d7aca36cda6661e90f7a69d4709#diff-
>> e2ab32f32889186bdeb0ab4f0ef55282
>> 
>> > ·        We should create a community OBS project (that the community can
>> manage) where the forked packages will be
>> > created and where the build will run (OBS_TARGET_PROJECT in
>> > 3rd-party/dpdk/jenkins-rc)
>> 
>> Okay.
>> 
>> > o   The project should be configured according to what we want to build -
>> distros/architectures. Can be done via OBS GUI.
>> >
>> > ·        Only after all patches have been submitted to a series branch does the
>> DPDK Jenkins job upload and configure an OBS
>> > package. This means that we'll have a build just for the whole series, not for
>> each patch. Not sure if this is a problem.
>> 
>> The flip side is the amount of time to build.  We'd prefer to build just one at a
>> time.
>> 
>> > ·        One thing that doesn't make sense to me is that the DPDK Jenkins job
>> builds dpdk after each patch - is this needed,
>> > since Travis is going to do the same thing anyway?
>> 
>> Travis doesn't.  The ovsrobot travis build is configured to cancel a build on a
>> branch if a new one comes.  That way we only build the latest.  Builds on travis
>> take 40+ min to complete, so if a 20-patch series came in, we wouldn't be done
>> building it for more than half a day.  Then if a v2+ is posted in rapid succession,
>> we lost all this time.  So for now, we only build the absolute last patch in the
>> series on Travis.
>> 
>> Also, the build server we run the robot on doesn't do the builds anymore
>> because it also got overloaded - so meson and ninja are not the actual
>> meson/ninja but just dummy commands.  :-/  Maybe I should re-enable and see
>> if things improved.
>> 
>> > ·        I've added some more comments to the PR itself.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> > Juraj
>> 


  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-13 20:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-03 13:08 Juraj Linkeš
2020-07-06 17:31 ` Aaron Conole
2020-07-13 14:20   ` Juraj Linkeš
2020-07-13 20:17     ` Aaron Conole [this message]
2020-07-15 19:13       ` Aaron Conole
2020-07-16 11:58         ` Juraj Linkeš
2020-07-16 12:54           ` Aaron Conole
2020-07-17  7:05             ` Juraj Linkeš
2020-07-17 13:24               ` Aaron Conole

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f7t365vw4nl.fsf@dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com \
    --to=aconole@redhat.com \
    --cc=ci@dpdk.org \
    --cc=juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).