DPDK CI discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>,  ci@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] Community CI Meeting Minutes - January 14, 2021
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 11:38:47 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f7t4kjjzd60.fsf@dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJFAV8xu4rXi23P-0rnwj9nPFC4VahTQ0hJcO5Ad80Xm2Gs-sg@mail.gmail.com> (David Marchand's message of "Thu, 14 Jan 2021 17:23:45 +0100")

David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com> writes:

> Sorry I did not attend.
>
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 5:14 PM Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu> wrote:
>> #################################################
>> Minutes
>>
>> =================================================
>> CI Status
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------
>> Intel Lab
>>
>> * Smoke tests are now enabled and results are being included in the
>> reports to patch works.  Running about 6 test cases right now.
>> Check the patchworks reports for the specific details (showing up as
>> intel-test in pathworks as the label).  Recommend to add a link to
>> the DTS test plan into the reports for each of the test cases that
>> are being run.
>> * Merge coming for pmdinfogen, which will add some additional python
>> dependencies.  Labs (UNH and Intel) will need to add these into the
>> test systems / DUTs where necessary:
>> https://patches.dpdk.org/cover/81614/
>
> Since it blocks those changes from being merged in the main repo, can
> we (Thomas or I) get a heads up when all systems are ready?
>
>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------
>> Github Actions / Travis CI / OBS
>>
>> * Github Actions have been running for about 1 month.  Working on
>> automating the process of checking the output and posting the
>> results to patchworks.  ETA is probably about 1 to 2 weeks away.
>> * Planning to keep Travis CI around for now, specifically for the
>> ARM builds.  Hopefully, the amount of “free execution time” will be
>> enough to cover the ARM builds.
>
> I am not sure we will have enough credits, but ok, why not.

If it turns out that we can't get builds from it, we can just remove it.

>
>> * OBS, still need a mechanism for timing out branches.  This will
>> get worked on once the Github Action work is completed.  Will take 2
>> to 4 weeks, once started.
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------
>> UNH-IOL Community Lab
>>
>> * We are aware of pending patchsets on the dashboard and will be investigating those today.
>> * Arm machines are now running compile and unit testing.
>> ** Now focusing on implementing functional and performance testing
>> using the NICs installed in the machine.
>> ** Broken unit test case: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=612
>> * Mellanox systems are now running functional testing; we are
>> currently monitoring these results for false negatives.  We need to
>> double check it sent an updated report to patchworks.
>> * Feature request: how could maintainer request rerun of jobs, possibly through the dashboard.
>> * Implemented a failure alert system to detect false failures quicker.
>> * Testing failures will now report the last 20 lines of log output,
>> example is here:
>> http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2021-January/174069.html
>
> Thanks!
> I noticed today, it is a small improvement, but it will save us some
> time when looking at the reports.
>
> Just a comment on this example, we can only see the Ubuntu SPDK
> failure and not the other failures, is this expected?


      reply	other threads:[~2021-01-14 16:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-14 16:12 Lincoln Lavoie
2021-01-14 16:23 ` David Marchand
2021-01-14 16:38   ` Aaron Conole [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f7t4kjjzd60.fsf@dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com \
    --to=aconole@redhat.com \
    --cc=ci@dpdk.org \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=lylavoie@iol.unh.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).