DPDK CI discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
	ci@dpdk.org, Michael Santana <msantana@redhat.com>,
	Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org>
Subject: [dpdk-ci] [PATCH] test: drop 'alarm_autotest' and 'cycles_autotest' from test suite
Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 20:16:46 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f7teedv8y6p.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)

The tests 'alarm_autotest' and 'cycles_autotest' rely on the underlying
system having very accurate and precise timing.  On systems where the timing
isn't as rigid, or the load is particularly high, these tests are unreliable
since the wake latency from the scheduler can be high enough to miss the
timing window.

Remove these tests from the test suites.  Maybe it's useful for these
tests to be present as a diagnostics tool, but for normal unit testing,
they don't provide much value.  They have falsely flagged patches as
FAIL on various infrastructures.

Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
---
 app/test/meson.build | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test/meson.build b/app/test/meson.build
index 08c82d3d23..8dec48e81c 100644
--- a/app/test/meson.build
+++ b/app/test/meson.build
@@ -185,14 +185,12 @@ test_deps = [
 # to indicate whether it can run in no-huge mode.
 fast_tests = [
         ['acl_autotest', true],
-        ['alarm_autotest', false],
         ['atomic_autotest', false],
         ['bitops_autotest', true],
         ['byteorder_autotest', true],
         ['cmdline_autotest', true],
         ['common_autotest', true],
         ['cpuflags_autotest', true],
-        ['cycles_autotest', true],
         ['debug_autotest', true],
         ['eal_flags_c_opt_autotest', false],
         ['eal_flags_main_opt_autotest', false],
-- 
2.31.1


             reply	other threads:[~2021-05-25  0:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-25  0:16 Aaron Conole [this message]
2021-05-26 11:58 ` [dpdk-ci] [PATCH v2] test: remove strict timing requirements from alarm and cycles tests Aaron Conole
2021-05-26 13:06   ` Aaron Conole
2021-06-03 13:46 ` [dpdk-ci] [PATCH v3] " Aaron Conole
2021-06-03 15:22   ` [dpdk-ci] [PATCH v4] " Aaron Conole
2021-06-03 16:13     ` David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f7teedv8y6p.fsf@redhat.com \
    --to=aconole@redhat.com \
    --cc=ci@dpdk.org \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=i.maximets@ovn.org \
    --cc=msantana@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).