From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C5AE4658F; Mon, 14 Apr 2025 20:41:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58189402D2; Mon, 14 Apr 2025 20:41:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B5A3402CC for ; Mon, 14 Apr 2025 20:41:26 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1744656086; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Pqml79vgw8nwZwHY95AANIZKc/bychEfvaAi0GNhg+o=; b=M6pWW3chzgTBpOPQQ7QRaAgj9rvaJSMFpurCvUXaS89KqSYPbBQGhuwisqp0ml8p/vqUL9 xvoxM/zqn0RNq9aMY1oy0rbxX62tB6Ccep1C4Yq1cAGjVTpCKzIJCdM8JIR8paXkSvydur rRq4jBJ6ibv5fBA9EY1cXhw9OBKKS+0= Received: from mx-prod-mc-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-35-165-154-97.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.165.154.97]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-349-4Yt4-ARtPUibG2yw-6gk5Q-1; Mon, 14 Apr 2025 14:41:24 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 4Yt4-ARtPUibG2yw-6gk5Q-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: 4Yt4-ARtPUibG2yw-6gk5Q_1744656084 Received: from mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.93]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B40C3180AF55; Mon, 14 Apr 2025 18:41:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from RHTRH0061144 (unknown [10.22.64.251]) by mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1377D180B487; Mon, 14 Apr 2025 18:41:21 +0000 (UTC) From: Aaron Conole To: David Marchand Cc: ci@dpdk.org, thomas@monjalon.net, alialnu@nvidia.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools: fix date parsing in patchwork polling In-Reply-To: <20250331111926.3404719-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> (David Marchand's message of "Mon, 31 Mar 2025 13:19:26 +0200") References: <20250331111926.3404719-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 14:41:20 -0400 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.93 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: BnwzI0jckIvmzxU2rymrTl8YLhoQG-6nP7lr8myk-Mc_1744656084 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org David Marchand writes: > Though it is not fully understood why (maybe some system upgrade..?), > parsing date is now failing on some long running Debian system. > > Specify date format earlier in the command line. > > Fixes: baaec1836189 ("tools: filter new patchwork IDs by date") > > Signed-off-by: David Marchand > --- Applied, thanks Ali and David.