From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A9F9A0547 for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 17:55:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2000640041; Wed, 19 May 2021 17:55:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 747DA4003F for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 17:55:08 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1621439707; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=pflD/z1a9H4Sqn8XwzMyd3bD2l7eeTrz+tptPOb8OQY=; b=Chm2sMIKWla0UepOLt1L33nrnF3w9veHSrbDA55UQYDVcptoEP4TJ8XLsKuWYnjx8xQz5U 6P42VimVskpcC2F/Xhm0sOxf/LcSMGFKn7/EGj4teCoPlo+05nPY4JSijFmc0IgWs0R4Fh 8Vec0tNyU54SUpFKC5qBbu9tvimNqjE= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-39-oMzTq-3FNQ-D5WgWon3kzQ-1; Wed, 19 May 2021 11:54:26 -0400 X-MC-Unique: oMzTq-3FNQ-D5WgWon3kzQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4E01106BB24; Wed, 19 May 2021 15:54:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from RHTPC1VM0NT (ovpn-118-71.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.118.71]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B73675D6D5; Wed, 19 May 2021 15:54:20 +0000 (UTC) From: Aaron Conole To: Lincoln Lavoie Cc: Thomas Monjalon , ci@dpdk.org, dpdklab , David Marchand References: <1645051.GgosbX4935@thomas> Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 11:54:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Lincoln Lavoie's message of "Wed, 19 May 2021 09:21:13 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=aconole@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] UNH CI failing X-BeenThere: ci@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK CI discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: ci-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "ci" Lincoln Lavoie writes: > As far as I can tell, it looks like one of the clocks fell out of sync on the container runners, which caused the > builds to fail. I think that's also been causing some failures with the alarm_test and cycles_test unit tests. If the time source is making adjustments to time, we will probably fail these tests as well. > Also, as far I can tell from an initial look, it impacted the two patches Thomas cited. Two patches that are > running now (i.e. they don't have a full set of results yet, look like they are running on. So, it was a transient > issue. Obviously we need to track down its root cause. I suspect something happened with NTP, which should > be keeping the runners and bare metal systems synced. I'm looking into that now. > > For the patches with the failed jobs, we will queue those for rerun today. > > Cheers, > Lincoln > > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 9:05 AM Aaron Conole wrote: > > Thomas Monjalon writes: > > > It seems the IOL CI is failing today: > > > > > https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/1621406749-15536-1-git-send-email-changpeng.liu@intel.com/ > > > > https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20210519032745.707639-1-stevex.yang@intel.com/ > > > > > That's especially embarassing for closing the release. > > I don't see any useful logs in the failures. > > What changed?