DPDK CI discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: Michael Santana <msantana@redhat.com>,
	 ci@dpdk.org,  Juraj Linkes <juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech>,
	 Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	 Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-ci] [RFC pw-ci] pw_mon: check for recheck requested comments
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 17:05:04 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f7ttumx9kvz.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJFAV8zFAK+wkuBVvXY3wA2C_jxBLh9f6uQbf+copAT5Uovd+w@mail.gmail.com> (David Marchand's message of "Thu, 20 May 2021 15:38:35 +0200")

David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com> writes:

> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 4:18 PM Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> ENOTREADY: Missing the actual recheck logic... needs some input /
>>            design before committing to anything.
>>
>> When a developer wants to ask for a test case recheck (for example,
>> maybe to rerun the github-actions test suite), we scan for the specific
>> line:
>>
>> ^Recheck-request: .*$
>>
>> The line would break up as:
>>
>>    Recheck-request: [context]
>>
>> where '[context]' is the name of the check (as it appears in the UI).
>> For example, if we look at a patch that has 'github-robot', we can
>> request a recheck of the series by sending an email reply with the line:
>
> It could happen that the tree was broken and we want to rerun all or a
> list of tests.
> Coud we accept multiple ^Recheck-request lines?

I guess we can solve this with the comma separated list.

> Or maybe have a magic "all" context?

That might require more thought, but it's possible.  Do you think it
would be better than doing a comma separated list?

>>
>> Recheck-request: github-robot
>>
>> It is important to use the 'msgid' field to distinguish recheck
>> requests.  Otherwise, we will continuously reparse the same
>> recheck request and loop forever.  Additionally, we've discussed using a
>> counter to limit the recheck requests to a single 'recheck' per test
>> name.
>>
>> As an additional change, we run after the 'superseded' and 'completed'
>> checks, to ensure that we don't bother parsing comments from older
>> series that aren't relevant any longer.
>
> There was also an ask on filtering requesters (only maintainers and
> patch authors can ask for a recheck).


  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-20 21:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-19 14:17 Aaron Conole
2021-05-20  9:37 ` Juraj Linkeš
2021-05-20 19:16   ` Aaron Conole
2021-05-20 13:38 ` David Marchand
2021-05-20 21:05   ` Aaron Conole [this message]
2021-05-21  9:38     ` David Marchand
2021-06-17 14:38       ` Lincoln Lavoie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f7ttumx9kvz.fsf@redhat.com \
    --to=aconole@redhat.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=ci@dpdk.org \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech \
    --cc=lylavoie@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=msantana@redhat.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).