DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
To: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: souvikdey33 <sodey@sonusnet.com>,
	stephen@networkplumber.org, huawei.xie@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] add mtu set in virtio
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 11:16:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d141aa3a-e024-19ac-fe99-a9ea07002ce4@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160907032547.GG23158@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>



On 09/07/2016 05:25 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 09:57:39AM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>> Hi Souvik,
>>
>> On 08/30/2016 01:02 AM, souvikdey33 wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Souvik Dey <sodey@sonusnet.com>
>>>
>>> Fixes: 1fb8e8896ca8 ("Signed-off-by: Souvik Dey <sodey@sonusnet.com>")
>>> Reviewed-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
>>>
>>> Virtio interfaces should also support setting of mtu, as in case of cloud
>>> it is expected to have the consistent mtu across the infrastructure that
>>> the dhcp server sends and not hardcoded to 1500(default).
>>> ---
>>> drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>
>> FYI, there are some on-going changes in the VIRTIO specification
>> so that the VHOST interface exposes its MTU to its VIRTIO peer.
>> It may also be used as an alternative of what you patch achieves.
>>
>> I am working on its implementation in Qemu/DPDK, our goal being to
>> reduce performance drops for small packets with Rx mergeable buffers
>> feature enabled.
>
> Mind to educate me a bit on how that works?

Of course.

Basically, this is a way to advise the MTU we want in the guest.
In the guest, if GRO is not enabled:
  - In case of Kernel virtio-net, it could be used to
size the SKBs at the expected MTU. If possible, we could disable Rx
mergeable buffers.
  - In case of virtio PMD, if the MTU advised by host is lower than the
pre-allocated mbuf size for the receive queue, then we should not need
mergeable buffers.

Does that sound reasonnable?
Do I miss something?

Thanks,
Maxime

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-07  9:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-29 23:02 souvikdey33
2016-08-30  7:57 ` Maxime Coquelin
2016-09-01 22:20   ` Dey, Souvik
2016-09-02  7:05     ` Maxime Coquelin
2016-09-07  2:11       ` Dey, Souvik
2016-09-07  8:28         ` Maxime Coquelin
2016-09-07  3:25   ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-09-07  9:16     ` Maxime Coquelin [this message]
2016-09-08  7:30       ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-09-08  7:50         ` Maxime Coquelin
2016-09-08  7:57           ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-09-09  3:44             ` Dey, Souvik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d141aa3a-e024-19ac-fe99-a9ea07002ce4@redhat.com \
    --to=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=huawei.xie@intel.com \
    --cc=sodey@sonusnet.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).