patches for DPDK stable branches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>,
	John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>,
	Marko Kovacevic <marko.kovacevic@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, thomas@monjalon.net, arybchenko@solarflare.com,
	olivier.matz@6wind.com, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] doc: clarify L3 Tx checksum prerequisite
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 20:56:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d3d809fa-2f29-74bc-fbb7-9f0bfbe9bfb3@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181005044606.27026-1-jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>

On 10/5/2018 5:46 AM, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> Based on PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM definition the user needs
> to fill l2_len and l3_len mbuf fields before issuing
> HW Tx checksum request.
> 
> Fixes: dad1ec72a377 ("doc: document NIC features")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
> ---
> 
> See PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM at
> https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/tree/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h#n283
> 
> ---
>  doc/guides/nics/features.rst | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/doc/guides/nics/features.rst b/doc/guides/nics/features.rst
> index b085bda86..e726a6bb8 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/nics/features.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/nics/features.rst
> @@ -562,6 +562,7 @@ Supports L3 checksum offload.
>  * **[uses]     rte_eth_txconf,rte_eth_txmode**: ``offloads:DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_IPV4_CKSUM``.
>  * **[uses]     mbuf**: ``mbuf.ol_flags:PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM``,
>    ``mbuf.ol_flags:PKT_TX_IPV4`` | ``PKT_TX_IPV6``.
> +* **[uses]     mbuf**: ``mbuf.l2_len``, ``mbuf.l3_len``.

Thanks this was missing.

``mbuf.l2_len``, ``mbuf.l3_len`` are required for TX CKSUM offload, in
documentation there is no distinction for Rx or Tx, do you think does it worth
to clarify PMD `uses` these values for Tx cksum offload only?


>  * **[provides] mbuf**: ``mbuf.ol_flags:PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_UNKNOWN`` |
>    ``PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_BAD`` | ``PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_GOOD`` |
>    ``PKT_RX_IP_CKSUM_NONE``.
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-10-05 19:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-05  4:46 Jerin Jacob
2018-10-05  4:46 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] doc: clarify L4 " Jerin Jacob
2018-10-05  6:45   ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-05  6:44 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] doc: clarify L3 " Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-05  7:06   ` Jerin Jacob
2018-10-09 10:19   ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-10-05 19:56 ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2018-10-06  8:05   ` Jerin Jacob

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d3d809fa-2f29-74bc-fbb7-9f0bfbe9bfb3@intel.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
    --cc=marko.kovacevic@intel.com \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).