DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
To: "Tan, Jianfeng" <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>,
	Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>,
	dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/5] eal: set name when creating a control thread
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 17:46:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <da856a5d-efc3-9694-c8ee-37acc8e9e65b@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0e10a781-00d7-7003-c103-496a85e72584@intel.com>

On 27-Apr-18 5:17 PM, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
> 
> 
> On 4/27/2018 11:46 PM, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
>> Hi Olivier,
>>
>> After this patch, I find the two IPC threads block at 
>> pthread_barrier_wait(), and never wake up. Please refer below for more 
>> information. The system is Ubuntu 16.04.
>>
>> On 4/24/2018 10:46 PM, Olivier Matz wrote:
>>> To avoid code duplication, add a parameter to rte_ctrl_thread_create()
>>> to specify the name of the thread.
>>>
>>> This requires to add a wrapper for the thread start routine in
>>> rte_thread_init(), which will first wait that the thread is configured.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/net/kni/rte_eth_kni.c                |  3 +-
>>>   lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_proc.c      | 15 +++-----
>>>   lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_thread.c    | 52 
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>>   lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_lcore.h    |  7 ++--
>>>   lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_interrupts.c | 13 ++-----
>>>   lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_timer.c      | 12 +------
>>>   lib/librte_vhost/socket.c                    | 25 +++----------
>>>   7 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
>> [...]
>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_thread.c 
>>> b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_thread.c
>>> index efbccddbc..94d2a6e42 100644
>>> --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_thread.c
>>> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_thread.c
>>> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>>>   #include <stdint.h>
>>>   #include <unistd.h>
>>>   #include <pthread.h>
>>> +#include <signal.h>
>>>   #include <sched.h>
>>>   #include <assert.h>
>>>   #include <string.h>
>>> @@ -141,10 +142,53 @@ eal_thread_dump_affinity(char *str, unsigned size)
>>>       return ret;
>>>   }
>>>   +
>>> +struct rte_thread_ctrl_params {
>>> +    void *(*start_routine)(void *);
>>> +    void *arg;
>>> +    pthread_barrier_t configured;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static void *rte_thread_init(void *arg)
>>> +{
>>> +    struct rte_thread_ctrl_params *params = arg;
>>> +    void *(*start_routine)(void *) = params->start_routine;
>>> +    void *routine_arg = params->arg;
>>> +
>>> +    pthread_barrier_wait(&params->configured);
>>
>> This thread never wakes up. The call trace as below:
>>
>> #0  0x00007ffff72a8154 in futex_wait (private=0, expected=0, 
>> futex_word=0x7fffffffcff4)
>>     at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/futex-internal.h:61
>> #1  futex_wait_simple (private=0, expected=0, 
>> futex_word=0x7fffffffcff4) at ../sysdeps/nptl/futex-internal.h:135
>> #2  __pthread_barrier_wait (barrier=0x7fffffffcff0) at 
>> pthread_barrier_wait.c:184
>> #3  0x000000000055216a in rte_thread_init (arg=0x7fffffffcfe0) at 
>> /home/tan/git/dpdk/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_thread.c:160
>> #4  0x00007ffff72a16ba in start_thread (arg=0x7ffff6ecf700) at 
>> pthread_create.c:333
>> #5  0x00007ffff6fd741d in clone () at 
>> ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:109
>>
>>> +
>>> +    return start_routine(routine_arg);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>   __rte_experimental int
>>> -rte_ctrl_thread_create(pthread_t *thread,
>>> -            const pthread_attr_t *attr,
>>> -            void *(*start_routine)(void *), void *arg)
>>> +rte_ctrl_thread_create(pthread_t *thread, const char *name,
>>> +        const pthread_attr_t *attr,
>>> +        void *(*start_routine)(void *), void *arg)
>>>   {
>>> -    return pthread_create(thread, attr, start_routine, arg);
>>> +    struct rte_thread_ctrl_params params = {
>>> +        .start_routine = start_routine,
>>> +        .arg = arg,
>>> +    };
> 
> Update:
> 
> I doubt it's due to that we defined this variable, params, on the stack; 
> and the value seems be overwritten by following code. Will send a patch 
> to fix it.

I'm not sure i follow you, but looking forward to the fix :)

As far as i can tell, even if the variable is on the stack, we're making 
copies of values there before destroying them, so even if param somehow 
got destroyed before the thread had a chance to start, we've already got 
all data we needed from it. I can't see how that value being allocated 
on the stack makes a difference.

Just about the only thing i can see that's slightly wrong here is lack 
of pthread_barrier_destroy(). Perhaps add that as well? :)

> 
> Thanks,
> Jianfeng
> 
> 
>>> +    int ret;
>>> +
>>> +    pthread_barrier_init(&params.configured, NULL, 2);
>>> +
>>> +    ret = pthread_create(thread, attr, rte_thread_init, (void 
>>> *)&params);
>>> +    if (ret != 0)
>>> +        return ret;
>>> +
>>> +    if (name != NULL) {
>>> +        ret = rte_thread_setname(*thread, name);
>>> +        if (ret < 0)
>>> +            goto fail;
>>> +    }
>>> +
>>> +    pthread_barrier_wait(&params.configured);
>>
>> Here, the thread wakes up normally, and continues.
>>
>> Any idea on what's going on?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jianfeng
>>
>>> +
>>> +    return 0;
>>> +
>>> +fail:
>>> +    pthread_cancel(*thread);
>>> +    pthread_join(*thread, NULL);
>>> +    return ret;
>>>   }
>>
> 
> 


-- 
Thanks,
Anatoly

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-27 16:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-03 13:04 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] fix control thread affinities Olivier Matz
2018-04-03 13:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] eal: use sizeof to avoid a double use of a define Olivier Matz
2018-04-10 16:18   ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-04-03 13:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] eal: new function to create control threads Olivier Matz
2018-04-10 16:18   ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-04-03 13:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] eal: set name when creating a control thread Olivier Matz
2018-04-10 16:34   ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-04-23 12:49     ` Olivier Matz
2018-04-17 22:32   ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-04-23 12:52     ` Olivier Matz
2018-04-03 13:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] eal: set affinity for control threads Olivier Matz
2018-04-10 16:18   ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-04-03 13:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] fix control thread affinities Olivier Matz
2018-04-10 16:20 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-04-24 14:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/5] " Olivier Matz
2018-04-24 14:46   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/5] eal: use sizeof to avoid a double use of a define Olivier Matz
2018-04-24 14:46   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/5] eal: new function to create control threads Olivier Matz
2018-04-24 14:46   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/5] eal: set name when creating a control thread Olivier Matz
2018-04-24 16:08     ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-04-27 15:46     ` Tan, Jianfeng
2018-04-27 16:17       ` Tan, Jianfeng
2018-04-27 16:46         ` Burakov, Anatoly [this message]
2018-04-24 14:46   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/5] eal: set affinity for control threads Olivier Matz
2018-04-24 14:46   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/5] examples: use new API to create " Olivier Matz
2018-04-24 22:53   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/5] fix control thread affinities Thomas Monjalon
2018-04-30 15:45   ` [dpdk-dev] pthread_barrier_deadlock in -rc1 (was: "Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] fix control thread affinities") Maxime Coquelin
2018-04-30 18:46     ` Olivier Matz
2018-05-01  8:59       ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-05-02  8:19       ` [dpdk-dev] pthread_barrier_deadlock in -rc1 Tan, Jianfeng
2018-05-02  8:34         ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-05-02  8:50           ` Tan, Jianfeng
2018-05-02  9:05             ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-05-02  9:20               ` Olivier Matz
2018-05-02  9:32                 ` Tan, Jianfeng
2018-05-02  9:41                   ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-05-02  9:30             ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-05-02  9:38               ` Tan, Jianfeng
2018-05-02  9:57               ` Olivier Matz
2018-05-02 10:01                 ` Tan, Jianfeng
2018-05-02 10:08                   ` Olivier Matz
2018-05-02 10:16                     ` Tan, Jianfeng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=da856a5d-efc3-9694-c8ee-37acc8e9e65b@intel.com \
    --to=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jianfeng.tan@intel.com \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).