DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chao Zhu" <chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "'Thomas Monjalon'" <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: "'Gowrishankar'" <gowrishankar.m@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal/ppc64: revert implement arch-specific TSC freq query
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 15:46:18 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <000b01d39fe7$be271350$3a7539f0$@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7852603.J7xFuoqAEp@xps>

Thomas,

I think it's OK to apply this patch now. It's been verified before and it's important for the correctness of the cycle counting on POWER. 
Thank you!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net]
> Sent: 2018年2月7日 15:26
> To: Chao Zhu <chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: 'Gowrishankar' <gowrishankar.m@linux.vnet.ibm.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal/ppc64: revert implement arch-specific TSC
> freq query
> 
> 07/02/2018 08:05, Chao Zhu:
> > The previous patch has some misunderstanding of the the TSC frequency
> > counting.
> > I support this.
> 
> Chao, it is very late in the release cycle.
> Do you want to take the risk of applying this patch in 18.02-rc4?
> If you discover a bug in this patch next week, it will be too late for fixing it in
> 18.02.
> 
> 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas@monjalon.net]
> > > Sent: 2018年2月1日 8:30
> > > To: Gowrishankar <gowrishankar.m@linux.vnet.ibm.com>; Chao Zhu
> > > <chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal/ppc64: revert implement
> > > arch-specific
> > TSC
> > > freq query
> > >
> > > 30/01/2018 09:59, Gowrishankar:
> > > > From: Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
> > > > <gowrishankar.m@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > >
> > > > This reverts commit 15692396fd68932b6a81f00f12d4b0da12baa7d3
> > > > (eal/ppc64: implement arch-specific TSC freq query). We intended
> > > > to derive pkt/sec estimation with cpu clock frequency. As timebase
> > > > register serves the timer purpose, we need to stick with it for
> > > > calculating pkt/sec, hence reverting the change.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: 15692396fd (eal/ppc64: implement arch-specific TSC freq
> > > > query)
> > >
> > > It is not clear what it is fixing.
> > >
> > > Chao, please review.
> >
> >
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-07  7:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-30  8:59 Gowrishankar
2018-02-01  0:29 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-02-07  7:05   ` Chao Zhu
2018-02-07  7:26     ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-02-07  7:46       ` Chao Zhu [this message]
2018-02-07  7:02 ` Chao Zhu
2018-02-08 21:22   ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='000b01d39fe7$be271350$3a7539f0$@linux.vnet.ibm.com' \
    --to=chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=gowrishankar.m@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).