From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <anhk_@126.com>
Received: from m50-110.126.com (m50-110.126.com [123.125.50.110])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AA681F3
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 03:50:54 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=126.com;
 s=s110527; h=Received:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:
 Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:
 Content-Transfer-Encoding:Thread-Index:Content-Language; bh=Xxv/
 90t7wXkWWZq+NU3Cth26bVz9nVUJJ/KKNBLJ3SY=; b=NfazPWIOVA9Byv6bhN0h
 1HlE+eYHgRcSjjPNizBU/vwf0t0g17VhUTjbOFJ18fe41Q1EobcwfwfhcvpMQSqW
 DIkHz5/bvghiG68JWugyTN18xBoGcm0og9rHhrk///FQcRNjvwCmo9/xrI2btBsK
 CcPxYVSYf/j1G03F/GDjf9s=
Received: from anhk (unknown [122.200.72.179])
 by smtp4 (Coremail) with SMTP id jdKowEAp6VYDNAxSLzd7BQ--.11225S2;
 Thu, 15 Aug 2013 09:50:59 +0800 (CST)
From: =?gb2312?B?sLK66r/8?= <anhk_@126.com>
To: "'Marc Sune'" <marc.sune@bisdn.de>,
	<dev@dpdk.org>
References: <520B4641.2030802@bisdn.de>
In-Reply-To: <520B4641.2030802@bisdn.de>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 09:51:00 +0800
Message-ID: <008101ce9959$e4959370$adc0ba50$@126.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0
Thread-Index: AQLhKHpZeYHAHicc8Nm8ahviYyiylJdwYheA
Content-Language: zh-cn
X-CM-TRANSID: jdKowEAp6VYDNAxSLzd7BQ--.11225S2
X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uf129KBjvdXoWruF43Kw18GF17Ww43ur1xXwb_yoW3Zrb_Ka
 1qvFyvyw15JrnrKF4UGF4rJa1fWFZF9ryYkrZ7GFn3tr4xArZrCryDu390vrWIy39IvF9F
 krnFywn3Xr9Y9jkaLaAFLSUrUUUUUb8apTn2vfkv8UJUUUU8Yxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT
 9fnUUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7IU0JEf7UUUUU==
X-CM-SenderInfo: 5dqkysa6rslhhfrp/1tbiJBp6XVF4A+5fEQAAsT
Subject: [dpdk-dev] =?gb2312?b?tPC4tDogIFBvcnQtaWRzIGFuZCBOSUMgZmVhdHVy?=
	=?gb2312?b?ZXM=?=
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 01:50:56 -0000

For the question one, maybe you can detect it before binding to igb_uio


-----=D3=CA=BC=FE=D4=AD=BC=FE-----
=B7=A2=BC=FE=C8=CB: dev-bounces@dpdk.org [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] =
=B4=FA=B1=ED Marc Sune
=B7=A2=CB=CD=CA=B1=BC=E4: 2013=C4=EA8=D4=C214=C8=D5 16:57
=CA=D5=BC=FE=C8=CB: dev@dpdk.org
=D6=F7=CC=E2: [dpdk-dev] Port-ids and NIC features

Dear all,

Two quick questions:

1) Is there a way to get the features available in the NIC? In =
particular, I
cannot see a way to retrieve the *maximum speed* of the card and I need =
to
determine whether is a FE, GE or 10GE card.

2) For a certain number of NICs installed in the system and bound to the
IGB_UIO driver, is it safe to assume that the association phyisical port =
<->
port_id will always be the same? Even after reboot, and regardless of =
the
order that are bound to the IGB_UIO driver (e.g. using pci_unbind.py)?

Best
marc