DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: Ivan Malov <ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru>, <dev@dpdk.org>,
	Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	David Marchand <david.marchand@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: fix port ID retrieval on vdev attach
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 14:10:06 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <024f4dc0-69f2-8cf0-8d3a-a5aba4c7427e@solarflare.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <25134244.IkLAQZDD0l@xps>

On 11.07.2018 13:52, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 11/07/2018 12:15, Andrew Rybchenko:
>> On 11.07.2018 13:02, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>> 11/07/2018 11:49, Andrew Rybchenko:
>>>> From: Ivan Malov <ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru>
>>>>
>>>> Attaching a vdev port may result in multiple
>>>> ports actually added because a vdev port may
>>>> have slave devices to be attached implicitly.
>>>>
>>>> Ethdev attach API has to fill in the port ID
>>>> to be read back by the user and what it does
>>>> is take the last assigned ID from the common
>>>> list after attach completion. Such an ID may
>>>> belong to a slave device and not to the vdev.
>>>>
>>>> This mistake must be precluded by requesting
>>>> the port ID by name of device being attached.
>>> No, the real issue is using this function rte_eth_dev_attach.
>>> It is broken since day 1.
>>> Mixing EAL devargs and ethdev port cannot work by design.
>>>
>>> If you want to attach a device, you must add it with
>>> 	rte_eal_hotplug_add
>>> and wait for the driver to probe the ports
>>> (which can be ethdev or other classes).
>> Yes, I totally agree. Doesn't it deserve to be fixed at least in stable?
> The concern with stable is to keep it stable :)
> I'm afraid this change can introduce more regressions.

Makes sense. I'll drop the patch.

>>> We should take these actions in 18.08:
>>> 	- deprecate rte_eth_dev_attach/rte_eth_dev_detach
>>> 	- deprecate rte_eal_dev_attach/rte_eal_dev_detach
>>> I did not take time to send the deprecation notices yet.
>>> Feel free to deprecate these functions yourself.
>> Should we deprecate it right now in 18.08 and schedule removal to 18.11?
> Yes, we should mark it as deprecated in 18.08 and plan for removal in 18.11.
> It is good to get it removed from the next LTS which is 18.11.

Yes, I agree. I'll care about it.

>> Or just add deprecation notice in 18.08, mark deprecated in 18.11 and
>> remove later?
> Later is too late :)

      reply	other threads:[~2018-07-11 11:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-11  9:49 Andrew Rybchenko
2018-07-11 10:02 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-07-11 10:15   ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-07-11 10:52     ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-07-11 11:10       ` Andrew Rybchenko [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=024f4dc0-69f2-8cf0-8d3a-a5aba4c7427e@solarflare.com \
    --to=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@6wind.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).