DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
To: "Xing, Beilei" <beilei.xing@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, "stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/i40e: fix packet type parser issue
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 04:02:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <039ED4275CED7440929022BC67E706115312D4B4@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1515746494-86927-1-git-send-email-beilei.xing@intel.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Xing, Beilei
> Sent: Friday, January 12, 2018 4:42 PM
> To: Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: [PATCH v2] net/i40e: fix packet type parser issue
> 
> Ptype mapping table will fail to update when loading PPP profile, fix the issue
> via modifying metadata and adding check.
> This patch also adds parser for IPV4FRAG and IPV6FRAG.
> 
> Fixes: ab2e350c4f4b ("net/i40e: improve packet type parser")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Beilei Xing <beilei.xing@intel.com>
> ---
> 
> v2 changes:
>  - Add parser for IPV4FRAG and IPV6FRAG.
> 
>  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c  | 44
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  drivers/net/i40e/rte_pmd_i40e.c |  6 ++++--
>  2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> index d80671a..69704e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> @@ -11283,43 +11283,55 @@ i40e_update_customized_ptype(struct
> rte_eth_dev *dev, uint8_t *pkg,
>  					continue;
>  				memset(name, 0, sizeof(name));
>  				strcpy(name, proto[n].name);
> -				if (!strncmp(name, "PPPOE", 5))
> +				if (!strncmp(name, "PPPoE", 5))
>  					ptype_mapping[i].sw_ptype |=
>  						RTE_PTYPE_L2_ETHER_PPPOE;
> -				else if (!strncmp(name, "OIPV4", 5)) {
> +				else if (!strncmp(name, "IPV4FRAG", 8) &&
> +					 !in_tunnel) {
>  					ptype_mapping[i].sw_ptype |=
>  						RTE_PTYPE_L3_IPV4_EXT_UNKNOWN;
> -					in_tunnel = true;
> -				} else if (!strncmp(name, "IPV4", 4) &&
> -					   !in_tunnel)
>  					ptype_mapping[i].sw_ptype |=
> -						RTE_PTYPE_L3_IPV4_EXT_UNKNOWN;
> -				else if (!strncmp(name, "IPV4FRAG", 8) &&
> -					 in_tunnel) {
> +						RTE_PTYPE_L4_FRAG;
> +				} else if (!strncmp(name, "IPV4FRAG", 8) &&
> +					   in_tunnel) {
>  					ptype_mapping[i].sw_ptype |=
>  					    RTE_PTYPE_INNER_L3_IPV4_EXT_UNKNOWN;
>  					ptype_mapping[i].sw_ptype |=
>  						RTE_PTYPE_INNER_L4_FRAG;
>  				} else if (!strncmp(name, "IPV4", 4) &&
> +					   !in_tunnel)
> +					ptype_mapping[i].sw_ptype |=
> +						RTE_PTYPE_L3_IPV4_EXT_UNKNOWN;
> +				else if (!strncmp(name, "OIPV4", 5)) {
> +					ptype_mapping[i].sw_ptype |=
> +						RTE_PTYPE_L3_IPV4_EXT_UNKNOWN;
> +					in_tunnel = true;
> +				} else if (!strncmp(name, "IPV4", 4) &&
>  					   in_tunnel)
Since you are doing some reordering here, it's better to move IPV4 && in_tunnel case above OIPV4, to match IPV4 && !in_tunnel case.

Regards
Qi

>  					ptype_mapping[i].sw_ptype |=
>  					    RTE_PTYPE_INNER_L3_IPV4_EXT_UNKNOWN;
> -				else if (!strncmp(name, "OIPV6", 5)) {
> +				else if (!strncmp(name, "IPV6FRAG", 8) &&
> +					 !in_tunnel) {
>  					ptype_mapping[i].sw_ptype |=
>  						RTE_PTYPE_L3_IPV6_EXT_UNKNOWN;
> -					in_tunnel = true;
> -				} else if (!strncmp(name, "IPV6", 4) &&
> -					   !in_tunnel)
>  					ptype_mapping[i].sw_ptype |=
> -						RTE_PTYPE_L3_IPV6_EXT_UNKNOWN;
> -				else if (!strncmp(name, "IPV6FRAG", 8) &&
> -					 in_tunnel) {
> +						RTE_PTYPE_L4_FRAG;
> +				} else if (!strncmp(name, "IPV6FRAG", 8) &&
> +					   in_tunnel) {
>  					ptype_mapping[i].sw_ptype |=
>  					    RTE_PTYPE_INNER_L3_IPV6_EXT_UNKNOWN;
>  					ptype_mapping[i].sw_ptype |=
>  						RTE_PTYPE_INNER_L4_FRAG;
> +				} else if (!strncmp(name, "OIPV6", 5)) {
> +					ptype_mapping[i].sw_ptype |=
> +						RTE_PTYPE_L3_IPV6_EXT_UNKNOWN;
> +					in_tunnel = true;
>  				} else if (!strncmp(name, "IPV6", 4) &&
> -					   in_tunnel)
> +					   !in_tunnel)
> +					ptype_mapping[i].sw_ptype |=
> +						RTE_PTYPE_L3_IPV6_EXT_UNKNOWN;
> +				else if (!strncmp(name, "IPV6", 4) &&
> +					 in_tunnel)
>  					ptype_mapping[i].sw_ptype |=
>  					    RTE_PTYPE_INNER_L3_IPV6_EXT_UNKNOWN;
>  				else if (!strncmp(name, "UDP", 3) && !in_tunnel) diff --git
> a/drivers/net/i40e/rte_pmd_i40e.c b/drivers/net/i40e/rte_pmd_i40e.c index
> 55ae2fe..af33a7c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/i40e/rte_pmd_i40e.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/rte_pmd_i40e.c
> @@ -2053,7 +2053,8 @@ static int check_invalid_pkt_type(uint32_t pkt_type)
>  	    l2 != RTE_PTYPE_L2_ETHER_LLDP &&
>  	    l2 != RTE_PTYPE_L2_ETHER_NSH &&
>  	    l2 != RTE_PTYPE_L2_ETHER_VLAN &&
> -	    l2 != RTE_PTYPE_L2_ETHER_QINQ)
> +	    l2 != RTE_PTYPE_L2_ETHER_QINQ &&
> +	    l2 != RTE_PTYPE_L2_ETHER_PPPOE)
>  		return -1;
> 
>  	if (l3 &&
> @@ -2082,7 +2083,8 @@ static int check_invalid_pkt_type(uint32_t pkt_type)
>  	    tnl != RTE_PTYPE_TUNNEL_GENEVE &&
>  	    tnl != RTE_PTYPE_TUNNEL_GRENAT &&
>  	    tnl != RTE_PTYPE_TUNNEL_GTPC &&
> -	    tnl != RTE_PTYPE_TUNNEL_GTPU)
> +	    tnl != RTE_PTYPE_TUNNEL_GTPU &&
> +	    tnl != RTE_PTYPE_TUNNEL_L2TP)
>  		return -1;
> 
>  	if (il2 &&
> --
> 2.5.5

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-14  4:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-11 10:03 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] " Beilei Xing
2018-01-12  8:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Beilei Xing
2018-01-14  4:02   ` Zhang, Qi Z [this message]
2018-01-15  7:26     ` Xing, Beilei
2018-01-15 13:51   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Beilei Xing
2018-01-15 23:55     ` Zhang, Qi Z
2018-01-17 14:56       ` Zhang, Helin
2018-01-20  9:45       ` Zhang, Helin
2018-01-19  7:50     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] net/i40e: change for ptype parser Beilei Xing
2018-01-19  7:50       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] net/i40e: fix fail to update ptype table Beilei Xing
2018-01-19  7:50       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] net/i40e: add parser for IPV4FRAG and IPV6FRAG Beilei Xing
2018-01-19  7:50       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] net/i40e: replace strncmp with strncasecmp Beilei Xing
2018-01-20 13:18       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] net/i40e: change for ptype parser Zhang, Qi Z
2018-01-20 13:32         ` Zhang, Helin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=039ED4275CED7440929022BC67E706115312D4B4@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).