* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: revert fix offload not supported mask @ 2018-12-11 17:25 Didier Pallard 2018-12-11 22:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Ferruh Yigit 2018-12-13 9:47 ` [dpdk-dev] " Zhang, Qi Z 0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Didier Pallard @ 2018-12-11 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: dev; +Cc: stable This reverts commit 09a62d75691f ("net/i40e: fix offload not supported mask") Contrary to what is said in above patch commit log, I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_NOTSUP_MASK is the mask of Tx offload bits that are part of PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK but not included in I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK. Above patch erroneously includes all PKT_RX_OFFLOAD_ bits in the I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_NOTSUP_MASK, this is not what is expected. Restore the initial xor that gives the expected result. Fixes: 09a62d75691f ("net/i40e: fix offload not supported mask") Cc: stable@dpdk.org Signed-off-by: Didier Pallard <didier.pallard@6wind.com> --- drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c index e1152ff0ea58..ab74a488f88b 100644 --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ I40E_TX_IEEE1588_TMST) #define I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_NOTSUP_MASK \ - ~(PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK & I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK) + (PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK ^ I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK) static inline void i40e_rxd_to_vlan_tci(struct rte_mbuf *mb, volatile union i40e_rx_desc *rxdp) -- 2.11.0 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] net/i40e: revert fix offload not supported mask 2018-12-11 17:25 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: revert fix offload not supported mask Didier Pallard @ 2018-12-11 22:01 ` Ferruh Yigit 2018-12-12 3:03 ` Zhang, Qi Z 2018-12-12 6:17 ` Ye Xiaolong 2018-12-13 9:47 ` [dpdk-dev] " Zhang, Qi Z 1 sibling, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Ferruh Yigit @ 2018-12-11 22:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Didier Pallard, dev; +Cc: stable, Xiaolong Ye, Qi Zhang, Beilei Xing On 12/11/2018 5:25 PM, Didier Pallard wrote: > This reverts > commit 09a62d75691f ("net/i40e: fix offload not supported mask") > > Contrary to what is said in above patch commit log, > I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_NOTSUP_MASK is the mask of Tx offload bits that are part > of PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK but not included in I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK. > Above patch erroneously includes all PKT_RX_OFFLOAD_ bits in the > I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_NOTSUP_MASK, this is not what is expected. Argh, yes it does set Rx offload bits, +1 to revert. cc'ed author and maintainers of the PMD. > Restore the initial xor that gives the expected result. > > Fixes: 09a62d75691f ("net/i40e: fix offload not supported mask") > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > Signed-off-by: Didier Pallard <didier.pallard@6wind.com> > --- > drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c > index e1152ff0ea58..ab74a488f88b 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c > @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ > I40E_TX_IEEE1588_TMST) > > #define I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_NOTSUP_MASK \ > - ~(PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK & I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK) > + (PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK ^ I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK) > > static inline void > i40e_rxd_to_vlan_tci(struct rte_mbuf *mb, volatile union i40e_rx_desc *rxdp) > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] net/i40e: revert fix offload not supported mask 2018-12-11 22:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Ferruh Yigit @ 2018-12-12 3:03 ` Zhang, Qi Z 2018-12-12 6:17 ` Ye Xiaolong 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Zhang, Qi Z @ 2018-12-12 3:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yigit, Ferruh, Didier Pallard, dev; +Cc: stable, Ye, Xiaolong, Xing, Beilei > -----Original Message----- > From: Yigit, Ferruh > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 6:01 AM > To: Didier Pallard <didier.pallard@6wind.com>; dev@dpdk.org > Cc: stable@dpdk.org; Ye, Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z > <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>; Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing@intel.com> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] net/i40e: revert fix offload not supported > mask > > On 12/11/2018 5:25 PM, Didier Pallard wrote: > > This reverts > > commit 09a62d75691f ("net/i40e: fix offload not supported mask") > > > > Contrary to what is said in above patch commit log, > > I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_NOTSUP_MASK is the mask of Tx offload bits that are > > part of PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK but not included in I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK. > > Above patch erroneously includes all PKT_RX_OFFLOAD_ bits in the > > I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_NOTSUP_MASK, this is not what is expected. > > Argh, yes it does set Rx offload bits, +1 to revert. > cc'ed author and maintainers of the PMD. I think this revert make sense to me, I didn't notice Tx offload and Rx offload shared the same 64 bits previously > > > Restore the initial xor that gives the expected result. > > > > Fixes: 09a62d75691f ("net/i40e: fix offload not supported mask") > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > Signed-off-by: Didier Pallard <didier.pallard@6wind.com> > > --- > > drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c > > b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c index e1152ff0ea58..ab74a488f88b 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c > > @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ > > I40E_TX_IEEE1588_TMST) > > > > #define I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_NOTSUP_MASK \ > > - ~(PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK & I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK) > > + (PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK ^ I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK) > > > > static inline void > > i40e_rxd_to_vlan_tci(struct rte_mbuf *mb, volatile union i40e_rx_desc > > *rxdp) > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] net/i40e: revert fix offload not supported mask 2018-12-11 22:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Ferruh Yigit 2018-12-12 3:03 ` Zhang, Qi Z @ 2018-12-12 6:17 ` Ye Xiaolong 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Ye Xiaolong @ 2018-12-12 6:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Didier Pallard, Ferruh Yigit; +Cc: dev, stable, Qi Zhang, Beilei Xing On 12/11, Ferruh Yigit wrote: >On 12/11/2018 5:25 PM, Didier Pallard wrote: >> This reverts >> commit 09a62d75691f ("net/i40e: fix offload not supported mask") >> >> Contrary to what is said in above patch commit log, >> I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_NOTSUP_MASK is the mask of Tx offload bits that are part >> of PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK but not included in I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK. >> Above patch erroneously includes all PKT_RX_OFFLOAD_ bits in the >> I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_NOTSUP_MASK, this is not what is expected. > >Argh, yes it does set Rx offload bits, +1 to revert. >cc'ed author and maintainers of the PMD. > Thanks for catching it and sorry for my unthoughtful patch. Thanks, Xiaolong >> Restore the initial xor that gives the expected result. >> >> Fixes: 09a62d75691f ("net/i40e: fix offload not supported mask") >> Cc: stable@dpdk.org >> Signed-off-by: Didier Pallard <didier.pallard@6wind.com> >> --- >> drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c >> index e1152ff0ea58..ab74a488f88b 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c >> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ >> I40E_TX_IEEE1588_TMST) >> >> #define I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_NOTSUP_MASK \ >> - ~(PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK & I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK) >> + (PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK ^ I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK) >> >> static inline void >> i40e_rxd_to_vlan_tci(struct rte_mbuf *mb, volatile union i40e_rx_desc *rxdp) >> > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: revert fix offload not supported mask 2018-12-11 17:25 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: revert fix offload not supported mask Didier Pallard 2018-12-11 22:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Ferruh Yigit @ 2018-12-13 9:47 ` Zhang, Qi Z 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Zhang, Qi Z @ 2018-12-13 9:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Didier Pallard, dev; +Cc: stable > -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Didier Pallard > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 1:25 AM > To: dev@dpdk.org > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: revert fix offload not supported mask > > This reverts > commit 09a62d75691f ("net/i40e: fix offload not supported mask") > > Contrary to what is said in above patch commit log, > I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_NOTSUP_MASK is the mask of Tx offload bits that are part of > PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK but not included in I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK. > Above patch erroneously includes all PKT_RX_OFFLOAD_ bits in the > I40E_TX_OFFLOAD_NOTSUP_MASK, this is not what is expected. > Restore the initial xor that gives the expected result. > > Fixes: 09a62d75691f ("net/i40e: fix offload not supported mask") > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > Signed-off-by: Didier Pallard <didier.pallard@6wind.com> Acked-by: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com> Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel Thanks Qi ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-12-13 9:47 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2018-12-11 17:25 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: revert fix offload not supported mask Didier Pallard 2018-12-11 22:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Ferruh Yigit 2018-12-12 3:03 ` Zhang, Qi Z 2018-12-12 6:17 ` Ye Xiaolong 2018-12-13 9:47 ` [dpdk-dev] " Zhang, Qi Z
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).