From: "Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
To: "Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>,
"Zhao1, Wei" <wei.zhao1@intel.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] net/iavf: fix Tx interrupt vertor configuration error
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 02:49:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <039ED4275CED7440929022BC67E70611533614C4@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <039ED4275CED7440929022BC67E7061153353827@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Zhang, Qi Z
> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 3:03 PM
> To: Zhao1, Wei <wei.zhao1@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] net/iavf: fix Tx interrupt vertor configuration
> error
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Zhao1, Wei
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 1:08 PM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org; Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>; Zhao1, Wei
> > <wei.zhao1@intel.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH v4] net/iavf: fix Tx interrupt vertor configuration
> > error
> >
> > There is need to align to kernel iavf code when setting Tx queue
> > interrupt vector in messge VIRTCHNL_OP_CONFIG_IRQ_MAP, if not it maybe
> > cause restart iavf port error in some scenario.
>
> Actually , we are not aligned with kernel iavf's implementation which assume rxq
> = txq
>
> Reword the commit log as below:
>
> According to latest AVF virtual channel spec, interrupt vector is
> required to be configured for each Tx queue.
> The patch implemented the mechanism by assign interrupt vector to
> each Tx queue with round robin (same method for Rx queue).
> This also fixed the unexpected Tx queue config error when hosted by
> ice kernel driver.
>
> >
> > Fixes: 69dd4c3d0898 ("net/avf: enable queue and device")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Zhao <wei.zhao1@intel.com>
> >
>
> Acked-by: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
>
> Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel with above change.
The patch is dropped due to the limitation is removed from virtual channel, no need to worry about Tx interrupt vector in vf side.
>
> Thanks
> Qi
>
> > ---
> >
> > v2:
> > update git log and add new work around
> >
> > v3:
> > update git comment and change fix code as suggestion
> >
> > v4:
> > add txq_map in struct avf_info to keep vector mapping info
> > ---
> > drivers/net/iavf/iavf.h | 1 +
> > drivers/net/iavf/iavf_ethdev.c | 9 +++++++++
> > drivers/net/iavf/iavf_vchnl.c
> > | 2 +-
> > 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/iavf/iavf.h b/drivers/net/iavf/iavf.h index
> > e6e3e8d..81d0054 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/iavf/iavf.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/iavf/iavf.h
> > @@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ struct iavf_info {
> > uint16_t msix_base; /* msix vector base from */
> > /* queue bitmask for each vector */
> > uint16_t rxq_map[IAVF_MAX_MSIX_VECTORS];
> > + uint16_t txq_map[IAVF_MAX_MSIX_VECTORS];
> > };
> >
> > #define IAVF_MAX_PKT_TYPE 256
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_ethdev.c
> > b/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_ethdev.c index 846e604..187a31c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_ethdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_ethdev.c
> > @@ -336,6 +336,8 @@ static int iavf_config_rx_queues_irqs(struct
> > rte_eth_dev *dev,
> > /* map all queues to the same interrupt */
> > for (i = 0; i < dev->data->nb_rx_queues; i++)
> > vf->rxq_map[vf->msix_base] |= 1 << i;
> > + for (i = 0; i < dev->data->nb_tx_queues; i++)
> > + vf->txq_map[vf->msix_base] |= 1 << i;
> > } else {
> > if (!rte_intr_allow_others(intr_handle)) {
> > vf->nb_msix = 1;
> > @@ -344,6 +346,8 @@ static int iavf_config_rx_queues_irqs(struct
> > rte_eth_dev *dev,
> > vf->rxq_map[vf->msix_base] |= 1 << i;
> > intr_handle->intr_vec[i] = IAVF_MISC_VEC_ID;
> > }
> > + for (i = 0; i < dev->data->nb_tx_queues; i++)
> > + vf->txq_map[vf->msix_base] |= 1 << i;
> > PMD_DRV_LOG(DEBUG,
> > "vector %u are mapping to all Rx queues",
> > vf->msix_base);
> > @@ -361,6 +365,11 @@ static int iavf_config_rx_queues_irqs(struct
> > rte_eth_dev *dev,
> > if (vec >= vf->nb_msix)
> > vec = IAVF_RX_VEC_START;
> > }
> > + for (i = 0; i < dev->data->nb_tx_queues; i++) {
> > + vf->txq_map[vec++] |= 1 << i;
> > + if (vec >= vf->nb_msix)
> > + vec = IAVF_RX_VEC_START;
> > + }
> > PMD_DRV_LOG(DEBUG,
> > "%u vectors are mapping to %u Rx queues",
> > vf->nb_msix, dev->data->nb_rx_queues); diff --git
> > a/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_vchnl.c b/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_vchnl.c index
> > 6381fb6..620e011 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_vchnl.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_vchnl.c
> > @@ -614,7 +614,7 @@ iavf_config_irq_map(struct iavf_adapter *adapter)
> > vecmap->vsi_id = vf->vsi_res->vsi_id;
> > vecmap->rxitr_idx = IAVF_ITR_INDEX_DEFAULT;
> > vecmap->vector_id = vf->msix_base + i;
> > - vecmap->txq_map = 0;
> > + vecmap->txq_map = vf->txq_map[vf->msix_base + i];
> > vecmap->rxq_map = vf->rxq_map[vf->msix_base + i];
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.7.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-02 2:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-19 3:04 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/iavf: fix vertor interrupt number " Wei Zhao
2019-03-19 3:04 ` Wei Zhao
2019-03-19 4:00 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2019-03-19 4:00 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2019-03-19 5:57 ` Zhao1, Wei
2019-03-19 5:57 ` Zhao1, Wei
2019-03-19 4:16 ` Stillwell Jr, Paul M
2019-03-19 4:16 ` Stillwell Jr, Paul M
2019-03-21 3:30 ` Zhao1, Wei
2019-03-21 3:30 ` Zhao1, Wei
2019-03-22 6:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Wei Zhao
2019-03-22 6:27 ` Wei Zhao
2019-03-26 2:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] net/iavf: fix Tx interrupt vertor " Wei Zhao
2019-03-26 2:40 ` Wei Zhao
2019-03-26 5:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Wei Zhao
2019-03-26 5:07 ` Wei Zhao
2019-03-26 7:03 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2019-03-26 7:03 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2019-04-02 2:49 ` Zhang, Qi Z [this message]
2019-04-02 2:49 ` Zhang, Qi Z
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=039ED4275CED7440929022BC67E70611533614C4@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=wei.zhao1@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).