From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72013A052B; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 02:36:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B14A1150; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 02:36:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D55AF04 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 02:36:14 +0200 (CEST) IronPort-SDR: dybmXcKc49V1IeGi+ZDuBz59an77PZR7RHVfI7FbALSpXirMiuEC8pF91XjJmO9YRujE7Zb0bJ h5RUNn1uhOMg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9696"; a="152577378" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,408,1589266800"; d="scan'208";a="152577378" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Jul 2020 17:36:13 -0700 IronPort-SDR: KPrCdd3XBMTyvtYNNHuuTMA1za2Xyt/IJFxxdbZXkmrBtaMf3WhsMFUiSiJxSUzv/jOlbOeV33 45qDRa/CjkXA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,408,1589266800"; d="scan'208";a="304053892" Received: from fmsmsx108.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.206]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 28 Jul 2020 17:36:13 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx609.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.89) by FMSMSX108.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.206) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 17:36:13 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx609.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.89) by fmsmsx609.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.89) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 17:36:13 -0700 Received: from shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.154) by fmsmsx609.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.89) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 17:36:12 -0700 Received: from shsmsx103.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.4.22]) by shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.43]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 08:36:10 +0800 From: "Zhang, Qi Z" To: "Su, Simei" , "Xing, Beilei" CC: "dev@dpdk.org" , "Guo, Jia" Thread-Topic: [PATCH v6] net/ice: fix GTPU down/uplink and extension conflict Thread-Index: AdZlQDjJ1da5kl4TSSi5N2HHkTYYqw== Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 00:36:09 +0000 Message-ID: <039ED4275CED7440929022BC67E706115486849A@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 11.2.0.6 dlp-reaction: no-action x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [dpdk-dev] iRE: [PATCH v6] net/ice: fix GTPU down/uplink and extension conflict X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" > -----Original Message----- > From: Su, Simei > Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 7:08 PM > To: Zhang, Qi Z ; Xing, Beilei > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Guo, Jia ; Su, Simei > > Subject: [PATCH v6] net/ice: fix GTPU down/uplink and extension conflict >=20 > When adding a RSS rule with GTPU_DWN/UP, it will write from top to bottom > for profile due to firmware limitation. If a RSS rule with GTPU_EH alread= y exists, > then GTPU_DWN/UP packet will match GTPU_EH profile. This patch solves thi= s > issue by remembering a gtpu_eh RSS configure and removing it before the > corresponding RSS configure for downlink/uplink rule is issued. >=20 > Fixes: 2e2810fc1868 ("net/ice: fix GTPU RSS") >=20 > Signed-off-by: Simei Su Acked-by: Qi Zhang Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel. Thanks Qi