DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
To: "Guo, Jia" <jia.guo@intel.com>,
	"Yang, Qiming" <qiming.yang@intel.com>,
	"Xing, Beilei" <beilei.xing@intel.com>,
	"Zhao1, Wei" <wei.zhao1@intel.com>,
	"Wu, Jingjing" <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
Cc: "Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"Zhang, Helin" <helin.zhang@intel.com>,
	"mb@smartsharesystems.com" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>,
	"Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	"barbette@kth.se" <barbette@kth.se>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/5] net/ice: maximize vector rx burst for ice
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 04:41:31 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <039ED4275CED7440929022BC67E706115522E229@SHSMSX107.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200827101008.76906-4-jia.guo@intel.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Guo, Jia <jia.guo@intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2020 6:10 PM
> To: Yang, Qiming <qiming.yang@intel.com>; Xing, Beilei
> <beilei.xing@intel.com>; Zhao1, Wei <wei.zhao1@intel.com>; Zhang, Qi Z
> <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>; Wu, Jingjing <jingjing.wu@intel.com>
> Cc: Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richardson@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Guo, Jia
> <jia.guo@intel.com>; Zhang, Helin <helin.zhang@intel.com>;
> mb@smartsharesystems.com; Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>;
> barbette@kth.se
> Subject: [PATCH v2 3/5] net/ice: maximize vector rx burst for ice
> 
> The limitation of burst size in vector rx was removed, since it should retrieve as
> much received packets as possible. And also the scattered receive path should
> use a wrapper function to achieve the goal of burst maximizing.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Guo <jia.guo@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx_vec_avx2.c | 11 +------
> drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx_vec_sse.c  | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx_vec_avx2.c
> b/drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx_vec_avx2.c
> index be50677c2..b7e624fda 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx_vec_avx2.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx_vec_avx2.c
> @@ -603,10 +603,6 @@ _ice_recv_raw_pkts_vec_avx2(struct ice_rx_queue
> *rxq, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
>  	return received;
>  }
> 
> -/**
> - * Notice:
> - * - nb_pkts < ICE_DESCS_PER_LOOP, just return no packet
> - */

Actually this is question for all the patches in the patchset.
Why we remove above comment? I think the patch should only target for the case when nb_pkgs > ICE_VPMD_RX_BURST?
For small packet number case, nothing changed, right?


>  uint16_t
>  ice_recv_pkts_vec_avx2(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
>  		       uint16_t nb_pkts)
> @@ -615,9 +611,7 @@ ice_recv_pkts_vec_avx2(void *rx_queue, struct
> rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,  }
> 
>  /**
> - * vPMD receive routine that reassembles single burst of 32 scattered packets
> - * Notice:
> - * - nb_pkts < ICE_DESCS_PER_LOOP, just return no packet
> + * vPMD receive routine that reassembles scattered packets
>   */
>  static uint16_t
>  ice_recv_scattered_burst_vec_avx2(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf
> **rx_pkts, @@ -657,9 +651,6 @@ ice_recv_scattered_burst_vec_avx2(void
> *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
> 
>  /**
>   * vPMD receive routine that reassembles scattered packets.
> - * Main receive routine that can handle arbitrary burst sizes
> - * Notice:
> - * - nb_pkts < ICE_DESCS_PER_LOOP, just return no packet
>   */
>  uint16_t
>  ice_recv_scattered_pkts_vec_avx2(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx_vec_sse.c
> b/drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx_vec_sse.c
> index 382ef31f3..25ae368cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx_vec_sse.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx_vec_sse.c
> @@ -205,10 +205,11 @@ ice_rx_desc_to_ptype_v(__m128i descs[4], struct
> rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,  }
> 
>  /**
> + * vPMD raw receive routine, only accept(nb_pkts >= ICE_DESCS_PER_LOOP)
> + *
>   * Notice:
>   * - nb_pkts < ICE_DESCS_PER_LOOP, just return no packet
> - * - nb_pkts > ICE_VPMD_RX_BURST, only scan ICE_VPMD_RX_BURST
> - *   numbers of DD bits
> + * - floor align nb_pkts to a ICE_DESCS_PER_LOOP power-of-two
>   */
>  static inline uint16_t
>  _ice_recv_raw_pkts_vec(struct ice_rx_queue *rxq, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
> @@ -264,9 +265,6 @@ _ice_recv_raw_pkts_vec(struct ice_rx_queue *rxq,
> struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
>  	const __m128i eop_check = _mm_set_epi64x(0x0000000200000002LL,
>  						 0x0000000200000002LL);
> 
> -	/* nb_pkts shall be less equal than ICE_MAX_RX_BURST */
> -	nb_pkts = RTE_MIN(nb_pkts, ICE_MAX_RX_BURST);
> -
>  	/* nb_pkts has to be floor-aligned to ICE_DESCS_PER_LOOP */
>  	nb_pkts = RTE_ALIGN_FLOOR(nb_pkts, ICE_DESCS_PER_LOOP);
> 
> @@ -444,8 +442,6 @@ _ice_recv_raw_pkts_vec(struct ice_rx_queue *rxq,
> struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
>  /**
>   * Notice:
>   * - nb_pkts < ICE_DESCS_PER_LOOP, just return no packet
> - * - nb_pkts > ICE_VPMD_RX_BURST, only scan ICE_VPMD_RX_BURST
> - *   numbers of DD bits
>   */
>  uint16_t
>  ice_recv_pkts_vec(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts, @@ -454,15
> +450,12 @@ ice_recv_pkts_vec(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
>  	return _ice_recv_raw_pkts_vec(rx_queue, rx_pkts, nb_pkts, NULL);  }
> 
> -/* vPMD receive routine that reassembles scattered packets
> - * Notice:
> - * - nb_pkts < ICE_DESCS_PER_LOOP, just return no packet
> - * - nb_pkts > ICE_VPMD_RX_BURST, only scan ICE_VPMD_RX_BURST
> - *   numbers of DD bits
> +/**
> + * vPMD receive routine that reassembles scattered packets
>   */
> -uint16_t
> -ice_recv_scattered_pkts_vec(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
> -			    uint16_t nb_pkts)
> +static uint16_t
> +ice_recv_scattered_burst_vec(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
> +			     uint16_t nb_pkts)
>  {
>  	struct ice_rx_queue *rxq = rx_queue;
>  	uint8_t split_flags[ICE_VPMD_RX_BURST] = {0}; @@ -496,6 +489,32 @@
> ice_recv_scattered_pkts_vec(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
>  					     &split_flags[i]);
>  }
> 
> +/**
> + * vPMD receive routine that reassembles scattered packets.
> + */
> +uint16_t
> +ice_recv_scattered_pkts_vec(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
> +			    uint16_t nb_pkts)
> +{
> +	uint16_t retval = 0;
> +
> +	while (nb_pkts > ICE_VPMD_RX_BURST) {
> +		uint16_t burst;
> +
> +		burst = ice_recv_scattered_burst_vec(rx_queue,
> +						     rx_pkts + retval,
> +						     ICE_VPMD_RX_BURST);
> +		retval += burst;
> +		nb_pkts -= burst;
> +		if (burst < ICE_VPMD_RX_BURST)
> +			return retval;
> +	}
> +
> +	return retval + ice_recv_scattered_burst_vec(rx_queue,
> +						     rx_pkts + retval,
> +						     nb_pkts);
> +}
> +
>  static inline void
>  ice_vtx1(volatile struct ice_tx_desc *txdp, struct rte_mbuf *pkt,
>  	 uint64_t flags)
> --
> 2.20.1


  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-31  4:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-27 10:10 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] maximize vector rx burst for PMDs Jeff Guo
2020-08-27 10:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/5] net/ixgbe: maximize vector rx burst for ixgbe Jeff Guo
2020-08-27 10:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/5] net/i40e: maximize vector rx burst for i40e Jeff Guo
2020-08-27 10:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/5] net/ice: maximize vector rx burst for ice Jeff Guo
2020-08-31  4:41   ` Zhang, Qi Z [this message]
2020-08-31  5:24     ` Jeff Guo
2020-08-27 10:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/5] net/iavf: maximize vector rx burst for iavf Jeff Guo
2020-08-27 10:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/5] net/fm10k: maximize vector rx burst for fm10k Jeff Guo
2020-08-27 12:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] maximize vector rx burst for PMDs Morten Brørup
2020-08-28  2:06   ` Wang, Haiyue
2020-08-28  6:39     ` Jeff Guo
2020-08-28 11:45       ` Morten Brørup
2020-08-28 20:30       ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-08-31 14:27         ` Wang, Haiyue

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=039ED4275CED7440929022BC67E706115522E229@SHSMSX107.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=barbette@kth.se \
    --cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=helin.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=jia.guo@intel.com \
    --cc=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
    --cc=qiming.yang@intel.com \
    --cc=wei.zhao1@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).