From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C607A00C5; Fri, 8 May 2020 07:07:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 597F31DBBA; Fri, 8 May 2020 07:07:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 743371DB8A for ; Fri, 8 May 2020 07:07:11 +0200 (CEST) IronPort-SDR: f0WJzxx0VWSIUAZwy+q8wtfA3XPoQZMC8ifHbHaG33+lYoqJc+YDLqjixGBmFBAZmDuIERsNWJ 4ElpkeH0M90g== X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 May 2020 22:07:10 -0700 IronPort-SDR: N2za7ElImVJN/kbQ+wcWY5eKBKGKKC/SXH9M5zzI+Ju8jLGzVKZ4TxHrratbzYDVUIa0rz6m5U cHhtQSMXpBmw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,366,1583222400"; d="scan'208";a="435555613" Received: from fmsmsx103.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.201]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 May 2020 22:07:10 -0700 Received: from shsmsx107.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.96) by FMSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Thu, 7 May 2020 22:07:09 -0700 Received: from shsmsx101.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.225]) by SHSMSX107.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.9.200]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Fri, 8 May 2020 13:07:06 +0800 From: "Sun, GuinanX" To: "Zhao1, Wei" , "dev@dpdk.org" CC: "Guo, Jia" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] fix defects of macro in VF Thread-Index: AQHWJN1nLcK/4zWkw0e/1+NKf2ccu6ic7iaAgACz4SA= Date: Fri, 8 May 2020 05:07:06 +0000 Message-ID: <05758BDAD7FC8E4BAED63D0390A8A955847737@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <20200508015913.48764-1-guinanx.sun@intel.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] fix defects of macro in VF X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi ZhaoWei > -----Original Message----- > From: Zhao1, Wei > Sent: Friday, May 8, 2020 10:19 AM > To: Sun, GuinanX ; dev@dpdk.org > Cc: Sun, GuinanX ; Guo, Jia > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] fix defects of macro in VF >=20 > Hi, > Please alaign " \" in each line. It will be modified in V2 patch. Remark: It can't be aligned in vim tool and email at the same time. It will be aligned in vim tool in v2 patch. >=20 >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: dev On Behalf Of Guinan Sun > > Sent: Friday, May 8, 2020 9:59 AM > > To: dev@dpdk.org > > Cc: Sun, GuinanX > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] fix defects of macro in VF > > > > The defects of UPDATE_VF_STAT and UPDATE_VF_STAT_36BIT exist. > > If latest is less than last, we will get wrong result. > > The issues exist only in ixgbe and e1000 NICs. > > > > Guinan Sun (2): > > net/ixgbe: fix defects of macro in VF > > net/e1000: fix defects of macro in VF > > > > drivers/net/e1000/igb_ethdev.c | 14 +++++++++++--- > > drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++-- > > 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > -- > > 2.17.1 >=20