From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dispatch1-us1.ppe-hosted.com (dispatch1-us1.ppe-hosted.com [148.163.129.52]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0868D5A6A for ; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 10:37:06 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Proofpoint Essentials engine Received: from webmail.solarflare.com (uk.solarflare.com [193.34.186.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1-us1.ppe-hosted.com (Proofpoint Essentials ESMTP Server) with ESMTPS id 42F54B40062; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 08:37:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.38.17] (91.220.146.112) by ukex01.SolarFlarecom.com (10.17.10.4) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Wed, 3 Oct 2018 09:36:56 +0100 To: Thomas Monjalon , Jerin Jacob CC: Wenzhuo Lu , Jingjing Wu , Bernard Iremonger , John McNamara , Marko Kovacevic , Ferruh Yigit , Olivier Matz , , , "Ananyev, Konstantin" References: <20180913134707.23698-1-jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com> <20181003075712.GA2003@jerin> <4436965.z0pH4WHX7F@xps> From: Andrew Rybchenko Message-ID: <05d21d69-9829-7b70-93ad-fbbe3c2bc73a@solarflare.com> Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2018 11:36:14 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4436965.z0pH4WHX7F@xps> Content-Language: en-GB X-Originating-IP: [91.220.146.112] X-ClientProxiedBy: ocex03.SolarFlarecom.com (10.20.40.36) To ukex01.SolarFlarecom.com (10.17.10.4) X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-12.5.0.1300-8.5.1010-24132.003 X-TM-AS-Result: No-6.881600-8.000000-10 X-TMASE-MatchedRID: zGP2F0O7j/v4ECMHJTM/uSa1MaKuob8PC/ExpXrHizxQKAQSutQYXPRP dGKxu2/jPsa/G6kD6DvbZy9r8jP7KU0RXiHO3RRB5gCHftmwEMJ8yGO3dvk8/QJ1vk7thYuGUdf EKc10rU4vQVE0yOGFpYqBZeVCt3Cf0nbjHOkZyPk+W6N2SzBTBwfnX3+9Fm452Yajy1P9W1XSUa Se3PSxAfdoK1MEIGGXeTjw/FyRX6RNfs8n85Te8oMbH85DUZXyzcMWxJE1Fd36C0ePs7A07S0hd U7+T7fLw+nf72FYAAgrewv4MjmXC8kvIv4UZ7o2bfxR/DUvNqvdhtKRxPsjI+maniT1Eq+tY1xL tGtYd+TCnQKFq/+9zRlNqmRpa0mDftwZ3X11IV0= X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: Yes X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No X-TMASE-Result: 10--6.881600-8.000000 X-TMASE-Version: SMEX-12.5.0.1300-8.5.1010-24132.003 X-MDID: 1538555825-8h3aIjz3a13T Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] ethdev: add Rx offload outer UDP checksum definition X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2018 08:37:06 -0000 On 10/3/18 11:35 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 03/10/2018 09:57, Jerin Jacob: >> From: Andrew Rybchenko >>> 1. I'm not sure that it is OK that mbuf and ethdev changes go in one patch. >>> It seems typically mbuf changes go separately and mbuf changes should >>> be applied to main dpdk repo. >> I don't have strong opinion on this. If there are no other objection, I >> will split the patch further as mbuf and ethdev as you pointed out. > Those flags are handled in mbuf and ethdev. > As it is closely related, I think it is better to get the changes > in one patch, as you did. OK, thanks for clarification.