DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
To: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>, <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: <thomas@monjalon.net>, <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	<konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
	"david.marchand@redhat.com" <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
	Ray Kinsella <mdr@ashroe.eu>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V2] ethdev: add dev configured flag
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2021 17:26:06 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <05e05f3d-193e-5f24-0885-e7c9116ded72@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d32a09f0-8031-ef4c-cc1c-26f2da9fc4bd@oktetlabs.ru>


在 2021/7/7 16:25, Andrew Rybchenko 写道:
> On 7/7/21 5:55 AM, Huisong Li wrote:
>> 在 2021/7/6 16:36, Andrew Rybchenko 写道:
>>> @David, could you take a look at the ABI breakage warnings for
>>> the patch. May we ignore it since ABI looks backward
>>> compatible? Or should be marked as a minor change ABI
>>> which is backward compatible with DPDK_21?
>>>
>>> On 7/6/21 7:10 AM, Huisong Li wrote:
>>>> Currently, if dev_configure is not called or fails to be called, users
>>>> can still call dev_start successfully. So it is necessary to have a flag
>>>> which indicates whether the device is configured, to control whether
>>>> dev_start can be called and eliminate dependency on user invocation
>>>> order.
>>>>
>>>> The flag stored in "struct rte_eth_dev_data" is more reasonable than
>>>>    "enum rte_eth_dev_state". "enum rte_eth_dev_state" is private to the
>>>> primary and secondary processes, and can be independently controlled.
>>>> However, the secondary process does not make resource allocations and
>>>> does not call dev_configure(). These are done by the primary process
>>>> and can be obtained or used by the secondary process. So this patch
>>>> adds a "dev_configured" flag in "rte_eth_dev_data", like "dev_started".
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> v1 -> v2:
>>>>     - adjusting the description of patch.
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>    lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c      | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>>>>    lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev_core.h |  6 +++++-
>>>>    2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
>>>> index c607eab..6540432 100644
>>>> --- a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
>>>> +++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c
>>>> @@ -1356,6 +1356,13 @@ rte_eth_dev_configure(uint16_t port_id,
>>>> uint16_t nb_rx_q, uint16_t nb_tx_q,
>>>>            return -EBUSY;
>>>>        }
>>>>    +    /*
>>>> +     * Ensure that "dev_configured" is always 0 each time prepare to do
>>>> +     * dev_configure() to avoid any non-anticipated behaviour.
>>>> +     * And set to 1 when dev_configure() is executed successfully.
>>>> +     */
>>>> +    dev->data->dev_configured = 0;
>>>> +
>>>>         /* Store original config, as rollback required on failure */
>>>>        memcpy(&orig_conf, &dev->data->dev_conf,
>>>> sizeof(dev->data->dev_conf));
>>>>    @@ -1606,6 +1613,8 @@ rte_eth_dev_configure(uint16_t port_id,
>>>> uint16_t nb_rx_q, uint16_t nb_tx_q,
>>>>        }
>>>>          rte_ethdev_trace_configure(port_id, nb_rx_q, nb_tx_q,
>>>> dev_conf, 0);
>>>> +    dev->data->dev_configured = 1;
>>>> +
>>> I think it should be inserted before the trace, since tracing
>>> is intentionally put close to return without any empty lines
>>> in between.
>> All right. Do I need to send a patch V3?
> Since the patch is waiting for resolution for ABI warning,
> please, send v3 with my Reviewed-by and ack from Konstantin.
> It will be a bit easier to apply when it is OK to do it.
> .
ok. I will send patch V3.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-07  9:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-08  8:00 [dpdk-dev] [RFC] lib/ethdev: " Huisong Li
2021-05-31  8:51 ` Huisong Li
2021-06-14 15:37 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-06-29  2:27   ` Huisong Li
2021-07-02 10:08     ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-07-02 11:57       ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-07-02 13:23         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-07-03  8:35           ` Huisong Li
2021-07-03 11:04             ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-07-05  3:03               ` Huisong Li
2021-07-05  9:50                 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-07-05 11:22                   ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-07-06  1:47                     ` Huisong Li
2021-07-04 20:05 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-07-05  3:18   ` Huisong Li
2021-07-05  6:07     ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-07-05  9:50       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-07-06  1:48         ` Huisong Li
2021-07-06  3:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V1] ethdev: " Huisong Li
2021-07-06  4:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V2] " Huisong Li
2021-07-06  8:36   ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-07-07  2:55     ` Huisong Li
2021-07-07  8:25       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-07-07  9:26         ` Huisong Li [this message]
2021-07-07  7:39     ` David Marchand
2021-07-07  8:23       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-07-07  9:36         ` David Marchand
2021-07-07  9:59           ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-07-07 10:40             ` David Marchand
2021-07-07 10:57               ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-07-06 17:49   ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-07-07  9:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V3] " Huisong Li
2021-07-08  9:56   ` David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=05e05f3d-193e-5f24-0885-e7c9116ded72@huawei.com \
    --to=lihuisong@huawei.com \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).