DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
To: Hernan Vargas <hernan.vargas@intel.com>,
	dev@dpdk.org, gakhil@marvell.com, trix@redhat.com
Cc: nicolas.chautru@intel.com, qi.z.zhang@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 20/29] baseband/acc100: update validate LDPC enc/dec
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 11:21:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <06130f31-d9d5-25f6-fdb0-e6bbce65499a@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221021052102.107141-21-hernan.vargas@intel.com>



On 10/21/22 07:20, Hernan Vargas wrote:
> Update validate functions to check for valid LDPC parameters to avoid
> any HW issues.
> Adding protection for null corner case and for HARQ inbound size out
> of range.
> HARQ input size from application may be invalid and causing HW issue.
> Add checks to ensure that if HARQ is invalid, set to some valid size to
> ensure HW issues do not occur.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hernan Vargas <hernan.vargas@intel.com>
> ---
>   doc/guides/bbdevs/acc100.rst          |   2 +
>   drivers/baseband/acc/acc_common.h     |   1 +
>   drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c | 285 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
>   3 files changed, 257 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/doc/guides/bbdevs/acc100.rst b/doc/guides/bbdevs/acc100.rst
> index db46023044..6c7025e019 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/bbdevs/acc100.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/bbdevs/acc100.rst
> @@ -71,6 +71,8 @@ ACC100 and ACC101 5G/4G FEC PMDs support the following BBDEV capabilities:
>      - ``RTE_LIBRTE_BBDEV_SKIP_VALIDATE`` : option to skip API input validation.
>        Recommended value is to keep the validation enable by default as a protection for negative
>        scenarios at a cost of some cycles spent to enforce these checks.
> +   - ``ACC100_EXT_MEM`` : default option with memory external to CPU on the PCie card DDR itself.
> +     Alternative build option will use CPU memory (not recommended).
>   
>   Installation
>   ------------
> diff --git a/drivers/baseband/acc/acc_common.h b/drivers/baseband/acc/acc_common.h
> index 97d10b8b40..eae7eab4e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/baseband/acc/acc_common.h
> +++ b/drivers/baseband/acc/acc_common.h
> @@ -121,6 +121,7 @@
>   #define ACC_ALGO_SPA                0
>   #define ACC_ALGO_MSA                1
>   #define ACC_HARQ_ALIGN_64B          64
> +#define ACC_MAX_ZC                  384
>   
>   /* Helper macro for logging */
>   #define rte_acc_log(level, fmt, ...) \
> diff --git a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
> index 4c890b28f1..383f71b6be 100644
> --- a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
> +++ b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c
> @@ -1954,14 +1954,11 @@ static inline int
>   validate_ldpc_enc_op(struct rte_bbdev_enc_op *op, struct acc_queue *q)
>   {
>   	struct rte_bbdev_op_ldpc_enc *ldpc_enc = &op->ldpc_enc;
> +	int K, N, q_m, crc24;
>   
>   	if (!validate_op_required(q))
>   		return 0;
>   
> -	if (op->mempool == NULL) {
> -		rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "Invalid mempool pointer");
> -		return -1;
> -	}
>   	if (ldpc_enc->input.data == NULL) {
>   		rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "Invalid input pointer");
>   		return -1;
> @@ -1970,17 +1967,12 @@ validate_ldpc_enc_op(struct rte_bbdev_enc_op *op, struct acc_queue *q)
>   		rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "Invalid output pointer");
>   		return -1;
>   	}
> -	if (ldpc_enc->input.length >
> -			RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_MAX_CB_SIZE >> 3) {
> -		rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "CB size (%u) is too big, max: %d",
> -				ldpc_enc->input.length,
> -				RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_MAX_CB_SIZE);
> +	if (ldpc_enc->input.length == 0) {
> +		rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "CB size (%u) is null", ldpc_enc->input.length);
>   		return -1;
>   	}
>   	if ((ldpc_enc->basegraph > 2) || (ldpc_enc->basegraph == 0)) {
> -		rte_bbdev_log(ERR,
> -				"BG (%u) is out of range 1 <= value <= 2",
> -				ldpc_enc->basegraph);
> +		rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "BG (%u) is out of range 1 <= value <= 2", ldpc_enc->basegraph);
>   		return -1;
>   	}
>   	if (ldpc_enc->rv_index > 3) {
> @@ -1995,13 +1987,89 @@ validate_ldpc_enc_op(struct rte_bbdev_enc_op *op, struct acc_queue *q)
>   				ldpc_enc->code_block_mode);
>   		return -1;
>   	}
> -	int K = (ldpc_enc->basegraph == 1 ? 22 : 10) * ldpc_enc->z_c;
> -	if (ldpc_enc->n_filler >= K) {
> -		rte_bbdev_log(ERR,
> -				"K and F are not compatible %u %u",
> -				K, ldpc_enc->n_filler);
> +	if (ldpc_enc->z_c > ACC_MAX_ZC) {
> +		rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "Zc (%u) is out of range", ldpc_enc->z_c);
> +		return -1;
> +	}
> +
> +	K = (ldpc_enc->basegraph == 1 ? 22 : 10) * ldpc_enc->z_c;
> +	N = (ldpc_enc->basegraph == 1 ? ACC_N_ZC_1 : ACC_N_ZC_2) * ldpc_enc->z_c;
> +	q_m = ldpc_enc->q_m;
> +	crc24 = 0;
> +
> +	if (check_bit(op->ldpc_enc.op_flags,
> +			RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_CRC_24A_ATTACH) ||
> +			check_bit(op->ldpc_enc.op_flags,
> +			RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_CRC_24B_ATTACH))
> +		crc24 = 24;
> +	if ((K - ldpc_enc->n_filler) % 8 > 0) {
> +		rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "K - F not byte aligned %u", K - ldpc_enc->n_filler);
> +		return -1;
> +	}
> +	if (ldpc_enc->n_filler > (K - 2 * ldpc_enc->z_c)) {
> +		rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "K - F invalid %u %u", K, ldpc_enc->n_filler);
> +		return -1;
> +	}
> +	if ((ldpc_enc->n_cb > N) || (ldpc_enc->n_cb <= K)) {
> +		rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "Ncb (%u) is out of range K  %d N %d", ldpc_enc->n_cb, K, N);
>   		return -1;
>   	}
> +	if (!check_bit(op->ldpc_enc.op_flags,
> +			RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_INTERLEAVER_BYPASS) &&
> +			((q_m == 0) || ((q_m > 2) && ((q_m % 2) == 1))
> +			|| (q_m > 8))) {
> +		rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "Qm (%u) is out of range", ldpc_enc->q_m);
> +		return -1;
> +	}
> +	if (ldpc_enc->code_block_mode == RTE_BBDEV_CODE_BLOCK) {
> +		if (ldpc_enc->cb_params.e == 0) {
> +			rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "E is null");
> +			return -1;
> +		}
> +		if (q_m > 0) {
> +			if (ldpc_enc->cb_params.e % q_m > 0) {
> +				rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "E not multiple of qm %d", q_m);
> +				return -1;
> +			}
> +		}
> +		if ((ldpc_enc->z_c <= 11) && (ldpc_enc->cb_params.e > 3456)) {
> +			rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "E too large for small block");
> +			return -1;
> +		}
> +		if (ldpc_enc->input.length >
> +			RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_MAX_CB_SIZE >> 3) {
> +			rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "CB size (%u) is too big, max: %d",
> +					ldpc_enc->input.length,
> +					RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_MAX_CB_SIZE);
> +		return -1;

Indentation?

> +		}
> +		if (K < (int) (ldpc_enc->input.length * 8 + ldpc_enc->n_filler) + crc24) {
> +			rte_bbdev_log(ERR,
> +					"K and F not matching input size %u %u %u",
> +					K, ldpc_enc->n_filler,
> +					ldpc_enc->input.length);
> +			return -1;
> +		}
> +	} else {
> +		if ((ldpc_enc->tb_params.c == 0) ||
> +				(ldpc_enc->tb_params.ea == 0) ||
> +				(ldpc_enc->tb_params.eb == 0)) {
> +			rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "TB parameter is null");
> +			return -1;
> +		}
> +		if (q_m > 0) {
> +			if ((ldpc_enc->tb_params.ea % q_m > 0) ||
> +				(ldpc_enc->tb_params.eb % q_m > 0)) {
> +				rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "E not multiple of qm %d", q_m);
> +				return -1;
> +			}
> +		}
> +		if ((ldpc_enc->z_c <= 11) && (RTE_MAX(ldpc_enc->tb_params.ea,
> +				ldpc_enc->tb_params.eb) > 3456)) {
> +			rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "E too large for small block");
> +			return -1;
> +		}
> +	}
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> @@ -2010,24 +2078,30 @@ static inline int
>   validate_ldpc_dec_op(struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *op, struct acc_queue *q)
>   {
>   	struct rte_bbdev_op_ldpc_dec *ldpc_dec = &op->ldpc_dec;
> +	int K, N, q_m;
> +	uint32_t min_harq_input;
>   
>   	if (!validate_op_required(q))
>   		return 0;
>   
> -	if (op->mempool == NULL) {
> -		rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "Invalid mempool pointer");
> +	if (ldpc_dec->input.data == NULL) {
> +		rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "Invalid input pointer");
> +		return -1;
> +	}
> +	if (ldpc_dec->hard_output.data == NULL) {
> +		rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "Invalid output pointer");
> +		return -1;
> +	}
> +	if (ldpc_dec->input.length == 0) {
> +		rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "input is null");
>   		return -1;
>   	}
>   	if ((ldpc_dec->basegraph > 2) || (ldpc_dec->basegraph == 0)) {
> -		rte_bbdev_log(ERR,
> -				"BG (%u) is out of range 1 <= value <= 2",
> -				ldpc_dec->basegraph);
> +		rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "BG (%u) is out of range 1 <= value <= 2", ldpc_dec->basegraph);
>   		return -1;
>   	}
>   	if (ldpc_dec->iter_max == 0) {
> -		rte_bbdev_log(ERR,
> -				"iter_max (%u) is equal to 0",
> -				ldpc_dec->iter_max);
> +		rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "iter_max (%u) is equal to 0", ldpc_dec->iter_max);
>   		return -1;
>   	}
>   	if (ldpc_dec->rv_index > 3) {
> @@ -2042,13 +2116,162 @@ validate_ldpc_dec_op(struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *op, struct acc_queue *q)
>   				ldpc_dec->code_block_mode);
>   		return -1;
>   	}
> -	int K = (ldpc_dec->basegraph == 1 ? 22 : 10) * ldpc_dec->z_c;
> -	if (ldpc_dec->n_filler >= K) {
> -		rte_bbdev_log(ERR,
> -				"K and F are not compatible %u %u",
> -				K, ldpc_dec->n_filler);
> +	/* Check Zc is valid value. */
> +	if ((ldpc_dec->z_c > ACC_MAX_ZC) || (ldpc_dec->z_c < 2)) {
> +		rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "Zc (%u) is out of range", ldpc_dec->z_c);
> +		return -1;
> +	}
> +	if (ldpc_dec->z_c > 256) {
> +		if ((ldpc_dec->z_c % 32) != 0) {
> +			rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "Invalid Zc %d", ldpc_dec->z_c);
> +			return -1;
> +		}
> +	} else if (ldpc_dec->z_c > 128) {
> +		if ((ldpc_dec->z_c % 16) != 0) {
> +			rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "Invalid Zc %d", ldpc_dec->z_c);
> +			return -1;
> +		}
> +	} else if (ldpc_dec->z_c > 64) {
> +		if ((ldpc_dec->z_c % 8) != 0) {
> +			rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "Invalid Zc %d", ldpc_dec->z_c);
> +			return -1;
> +		}
> +	} else if (ldpc_dec->z_c > 32) {
> +		if ((ldpc_dec->z_c % 4) != 0) {
> +			rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "Invalid Zc %d", ldpc_dec->z_c);
> +			return -1;
> +		}
> +	} else if (ldpc_dec->z_c > 16) {
> +		if ((ldpc_dec->z_c % 2) != 0) {
> +			rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "Invalid Zc %d", ldpc_dec->z_c);
> +			return -1;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	K = (ldpc_dec->basegraph == 1 ? 22 : 10) * ldpc_dec->z_c;
> +	N = (ldpc_dec->basegraph == 1 ? ACC_N_ZC_1 : ACC_N_ZC_2) * ldpc_dec->z_c;
> +	q_m = ldpc_dec->q_m;
> +
> +	if (ldpc_dec->n_filler >= K - 2 * ldpc_dec->z_c) {
> +		rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "K and F are not compatible %u %u", K, ldpc_dec->n_filler);
> +		return -1;
> +	}
> +	if ((ldpc_dec->n_cb > N) || (ldpc_dec->n_cb <= K)) {
> +		rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "Ncb (%u) is out of range K  %d N %d", ldpc_dec->n_cb, K, N);
> +		return -1;
> +	}
> +	if (((q_m == 0) || ((q_m > 2) && ((q_m % 2) == 1))
> +			|| (q_m > 8))) {
> +		rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "Qm (%u) is out of range", ldpc_dec->q_m);
> +		return -1;
> +	}
> +	if (ldpc_dec->code_block_mode == RTE_BBDEV_CODE_BLOCK) {
> +		if (ldpc_dec->cb_params.e == 0) {
> +			rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "E is null");
> +			return -1;
> +		}
> +		if (ldpc_dec->cb_params.e % q_m > 0) {
> +			rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "E not multiple of qm %d", q_m);
> +			return -1;
> +		}
> +		if (ldpc_dec->cb_params.e > 512 * ldpc_dec->z_c) {
> +			rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "E too high");
> +			return -1;
> +		}
> +	} else {
> +		if ((ldpc_dec->tb_params.c == 0) ||
> +				(ldpc_dec->tb_params.ea == 0) ||
> +				(ldpc_dec->tb_params.eb == 0)) {
> +			rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "TB parameter is null");
> +			return -1;
> +		}
> +		if ((ldpc_dec->tb_params.ea % q_m > 0) ||
> +				(ldpc_dec->tb_params.eb % q_m > 0)) {
> +			rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "E not multiple of qm %d", q_m);
> +			return -1;
> +		}
> +		if ((ldpc_dec->tb_params.ea > 512 * ldpc_dec->z_c) ||
> +				(ldpc_dec->tb_params.eb > 512 * ldpc_dec->z_c)) {
> +			rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "E too high");
> +			return -1;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	if (check_bit(op->ldpc_dec.op_flags, RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_DECODE_BYPASS)) {
> +		rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "Avoid LDPC Decode bypass");
> +		return -1;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Avoid HARQ compression for small block size */
> +	if ((check_bit(op->ldpc_dec.op_flags, RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_HARQ_6BIT_COMPRESSION)) && (K < 2048))
> +		op->ldpc_dec.op_flags ^= RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_HARQ_6BIT_COMPRESSION;
> +
> +	min_harq_input = check_bit(op->ldpc_dec.op_flags,
> +			RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_HARQ_6BIT_COMPRESSION) ? 256 : 64;
> +	if (check_bit(op->ldpc_dec.op_flags,
> +			RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_HQ_COMBINE_IN_ENABLE) &&
> +			ldpc_dec->harq_combined_input.length <
> +			min_harq_input) {
> +		rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "HARQ input size is too small %d < %d",
> +			ldpc_dec->harq_combined_input.length,
> +			min_harq_input);
>   		return -1;
>   	}
> +
> +	/* Enforce in-range HARQ input size */
> +	if (check_bit(op->ldpc_dec.op_flags, RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_HQ_COMBINE_IN_ENABLE)) {
> +		uint32_t max_harq_input = RTE_ALIGN_CEIL(ldpc_dec->n_cb - ldpc_dec->n_filler, 64);
> +
> +		if (check_bit(op->ldpc_dec.op_flags, RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_HARQ_6BIT_COMPRESSION))
> +			max_harq_input = max_harq_input * 3 / 4;
> +
> +		if (ldpc_dec->harq_combined_input.length > max_harq_input) {
> +			rte_bbdev_log(ERR,
> +					"HARQ input size out of range %d > %d, Ncb %d F %d K %d N %d",
> +					ldpc_dec->harq_combined_input.length,
> +					max_harq_input, ldpc_dec->n_cb,
> +					ldpc_dec->n_filler, K, N);
> +			/* Fallback to flush HARQ combine */
> +			ldpc_dec->harq_combined_input.length = 0;
> +
> +			if (check_bit(op->ldpc_dec.op_flags, RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_HQ_COMBINE_IN_ENABLE))
> +				op->ldpc_dec.op_flags ^= RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_HQ_COMBINE_IN_ENABLE;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +#ifdef ACC100_EXT_MEM

Same comment as RTE_LIBRTE_SKIP_VALIDATE, ACC100_EXT_MEM should be
replaced with a devarg. Can be done in next release.

> +	/* Enforce in-range HARQ offset */
> +	if (check_bit(op->ldpc_dec.op_flags, RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_HQ_COMBINE_IN_ENABLE)) {
> +		if ((op->ldpc_dec.harq_combined_input.offset >> 10) >= q->d->ddr_size) {
> +			rte_bbdev_log(ERR,
> +				"HARQin offset out of range %d > %d",
> +				op->ldpc_dec.harq_combined_input.offset,
> +				q->d->ddr_size);
> +			return -1;
> +		}
> +		if ((op->ldpc_dec.harq_combined_input.offset & 0x3FF) > 0) {
> +			rte_bbdev_log(ERR,
> +				"HARQin offset not aligned on 1kB %d",
> +				op->ldpc_dec.harq_combined_input.offset);
> +			return -1;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	if (check_bit(op->ldpc_dec.op_flags, RTE_BBDEV_LDPC_HQ_COMBINE_OUT_ENABLE)) {
> +		if ((op->ldpc_dec.harq_combined_output.offset >> 10) >= q->d->ddr_size) {
> +			rte_bbdev_log(ERR,
> +				"HARQout offset out of range %d > %d",
> +				op->ldpc_dec.harq_combined_output.offset,
> +				q->d->ddr_size);
> +			return -1;
> +		}
> +		if ((op->ldpc_dec.harq_combined_output.offset & 0x3FF) > 0) {
> +			rte_bbdev_log(ERR,
> +				"HARQout offset not aligned on 1kB %d",
> +				op->ldpc_dec.harq_combined_output.offset);
> +			return -1;
> +		}
> +	}
> +#endif
> +
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   #endif
> @@ -2686,7 +2909,7 @@ harq_loopback(struct acc_queue *q, struct rte_bbdev_dec_op *op,
>   	memset(fcw, 0, sizeof(struct acc_fcw_ld));
>   	fcw->FCWversion = ACC_FCW_VER;
>   	fcw->qm = 2;
> -	fcw->Zc = 384;
> +	fcw->Zc = ACC_MAX_ZC;
>   	if (harq_in_length < 16 * ACC_N_ZC_1)
>   		fcw->Zc = 16;
>   	fcw->ncb = fcw->Zc * ACC_N_ZC_1;

Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>

Thanks,
Maxime


  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-21  9:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-21  5:20 [PATCH v5 00/29] baseband/acc100: changes for 22.11 Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21  5:20 ` [PATCH v5 01/29] baseband/acc100: fix ring availability calculation Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21  9:04   ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-10-21  5:20 ` [PATCH v5 02/29] baseband/acc100: add function to check AQ availability Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21  9:07   ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-10-21  5:20 ` [PATCH v5 03/29] baseband/acc100: memory leak fix Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21  5:20 ` [PATCH v5 04/29] baseband/acc100: add LDPC encoder padding function Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21  5:20 ` [PATCH v5 05/29] baseband/acc100: check turbo dec/enc input Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21  5:20 ` [PATCH v5 06/29] baseband/acc100: check for unlikely operation vals Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21  5:20 ` [PATCH v5 07/29] baseband/acc100: enforce additional check on FCW Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21  9:08   ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-10-21  5:20 ` [PATCH v5 08/29] baseband/acc100: allocate ring/queue mem when NULL Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21  9:16   ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-10-21  5:20 ` [PATCH v5 09/29] baseband/acc100: reduce input length for CRC24B Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21  5:20 ` [PATCH v5 10/29] baseband/acc100: fix clearing PF IR outside handler Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21  5:20 ` [PATCH v5 11/29] baseband/acc100: set device min alignment to 1 Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21  5:20 ` [PATCH v5 12/29] baseband/acc100: add protection for NULL HARQ input Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21  5:20 ` [PATCH v5 13/29] baseband/acc100: reset pointer after rte_free Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21  5:20 ` [PATCH v5 14/29] baseband/acc100: fix debug print for LDPC FCW Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21  5:20 ` [PATCH v5 15/29] baseband/acc100: add enqueue status Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21  5:20 ` [PATCH v5 16/29] baseband/acc100: add scatter-gather support Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21  5:20 ` [PATCH v5 17/29] baseband/acc100: add HARQ index helper function Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21  5:20 ` [PATCH v5 18/29] baseband/acc100: enable input validation by default Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21  5:20 ` [PATCH v5 19/29] baseband/acc100: added LDPC transport block support Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21  5:20 ` [PATCH v5 20/29] baseband/acc100: update validate LDPC enc/dec Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21  9:21   ` Maxime Coquelin [this message]
2022-10-21  5:20 ` [PATCH v5 21/29] baseband/acc100: implement configurable queue depth Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21  5:20 ` [PATCH v5 22/29] baseband/acc100: add queue stop operation Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21  5:20 ` [PATCH v5 23/29] baseband/acc100: update uplink CB input length Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21  5:20 ` [PATCH v5 24/29] baseband/acc100: update log messages Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21  5:20 ` [PATCH v5 25/29] baseband/acc100: store FCW from first CB descriptor Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21  5:20 ` [PATCH v5 26/29] baseband/acc100: update device info Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21  5:21 ` [PATCH v5 27/29] baseband/acc100: add ring companion address Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21  9:29   ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-10-21  5:21 ` [PATCH v5 28/29] baseband/acc100: add workaround for deRM corner cases Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21  9:32   ` Maxime Coquelin
2022-10-21 15:40     ` Chautru, Nicolas
2022-10-21  5:21 ` [PATCH v5 29/29] baseband/acc100: configure PMON control registers Hernan Vargas
2022-10-21 13:06 ` [EXT] [PATCH v5 00/29] baseband/acc100: changes for 22.11 Akhil Goyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=06130f31-d9d5-25f6-fdb0-e6bbce65499a@redhat.com \
    --to=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=gakhil@marvell.com \
    --cc=hernan.vargas@intel.com \
    --cc=nicolas.chautru@intel.com \
    --cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=trix@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).