From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FDDE5A29 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 22:55:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Jan 2017 13:54:54 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,220,1477983600"; d="scan'208";a="921902322" Received: from sjgaffne-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.252.3.223]) ([10.252.3.223]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Jan 2017 13:54:53 -0800 To: Stephen Hemminger , dev@dpdk.org References: <20170112191212.22710-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> From: Ferruh Yigit Message-ID: <088c65d6-e709-23dd-3a86-e90e192fd30f@intel.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 21:54:52 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170112191212.22710-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] make a couple eth_dev_ops const X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 21:55:58 -0000 On 1/12/2017 7:12 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > Really trivial patches. Patches are not in patchwork, and not in the mail list. > > I also consider this a litmus test of how long it takes DPDK > project to merge trivial maintaince patches. > > Stephen Hemminger (2): > bnx: make eth_dev_ops const > ena: make eth_dev_ops const > > drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_ethdev.c | 2 +- > drivers/net/ena/ena_ethdev.c | 2 +- Right, ena and bnxt are missing const for eth_dev_ops. Do you want me send patches? > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >