From: oulijun <oulijun@huawei.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
"Li, Xiaoyun" <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>,
"linuxarm@openeuler.org" <linuxarm@openeuler.org>,
dev <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [Linuxarm] Re: [PATCH 1/3] app/testpmd: fix forwarding configuration when DCB test
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 20:20:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <089eecab-582b-38d4-c72d-2e1866753150@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5380fe49-4b31-b73f-5ef0-3751c1d353f7@intel.com>
在 2021/4/12 15:52, Ferruh Yigit 写道:
> On 4/10/2021 3:58 AM, oulijun wrote:
>>
>>
>> 在 2021/4/10 8:56, Ferruh Yigit 写道:
>>> On 3/25/2021 2:21 AM, Li, Xiaoyun wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: oulijun <oulijun@huawei.com>
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2021 21:40
>>>>> To: linuxarm@openeuler.org; Li, Xiaoyun <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>; dev
>>>>> <dev@dpdk.org>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Linuxarm] Re: [PATCH 1/3] app/testpmd: fix forwarding
>>>>> configuration when DCB test
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 在 2021/3/24 10:03, Li, Xiaoyun 写道:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: oulijun <oulijun@huawei.com>
>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 22:19
>>>>>>> To: Li, Xiaoyun <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>; Yigit, Ferruh
>>>>>>> <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
>>>>>>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; linuxarm@openeuler.org
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] app/testpmd: fix forwarding configuration
>>>>>>> when DCB test
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>> @@ -2707,14 +2707,16 @@ stop_port(portid_t pid)
>>>>>>>>> portid_t peer_pl[RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS];
>>>>>>>>> int peer_pi;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> - if (dcb_test) {
>>>>>>>>> - dcb_test = 0;
>>>>>>>>> - dcb_config = 0;
>>>>>>>>> - }
>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>> if (port_id_is_invalid(pid, ENABLED_WARN))
>>>>>>>>> return;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> + /*
>>>>>>>>> + * In "start_port" function, dcb_test is set to 1 based
>>>>>>>>> on dcb_config.
>>>>>>>>> + * So it should be cleared when dcb_config is 0.
>>>>>>>>> + */
>>>>>>>>> + if (dcb_config == 0)
>>>>>>>>> + dcb_test = 0;
>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I don't understand why are you changing this.
>>>>>>>> dcb_test will only be set when dcb_config is 1 when starting
>>>>>>>> ports.
>>>>>>>> And both
>>>>>>> dcb_test and dcb_config will be cleared when stopping ports.
>>>>>>>> So dcb will only affect when you set port dcb and then start port
>>>>>>>> and when
>>>>>>> stop port dcb will be cleared.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, I think. The forwarding streams should not be changed from
>>>>>>> "dcb_fwd_config_setup" to "rss_fwd_config_setup" after dcb info is
>>>>> configured.
>>>>>>> But, now, the logical codes do it when stopping ports and then
>>>>>>> starting ports.
>>>>>>>> So what's the problem of original codes?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Your change will cause issues that there's no place to set
>>>>>>>> dcb_config as 0. If
>>>>>>> you config dcb, then it'll be always dcb mode unless restart the
>>>>>>> whole
>>>>> testpmd.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As far as I know, the current testpmd only supports switching from
>>>>>>> the normal mode to the dcb mode, but does not support the reverse
>>>>> operation.
>>>>>>> And " dcb_config" is set to 1, and then "dcb_test" is set to 1
>>>>>>> after
>>>>>>> config.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're not answering my questions. Why are you changing the
>>>>>> behavior of
>>>>> testpmd?
>>>>>> Your change will make testpmd stay dcb mode once set dcb mode and
>>>>>> can't go
>>>>> back to normal mode. If users want to go back to normal mode,
>>>>> he/she has to
>>>>> restart the whole testpmd.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Yes. Testpmd and PMD driver are both in dcb mode after dcb info is
>>>>> configured.
>>>>> In my opinion, the 'dcb_test' flag can't be clear to go back to
>>>>> normal mode after
>>>>> stopping port and then starting port. Because PMD driver is still
>>>>> dcb mode. If
>>>>> users want to go back it, users should disable dcb mode and enable
>>>>> RSS or other
>>>>> mode.
>>>>>
>>>>>> It worked as you can set dcb mode and start port. After stopping
>>>>>> port, if you
>>>>> still want dcb mode, you need to set dcb mode command again. But
>>>>> at least the
>>>>> old way won't break anything.
>>>>>> @Yigit, Ferruh Not sure which behavior is better, what do you think?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And @oulijun can you just answer all comments in one thread?
>>>>>>
>>>>> After stopping port, the 'dcb_test' flag is clear. At this moment,
>>>>> the dcb
>>>>> configuration in testpmd has not be changed. users may not
>>>>> understand why
>>>>> the DCB mode needs to be reconfigured.
>>>>
>>>> OK. You're right. There's no place writing port->dcb_flag back to 0.
>>>>
>>>
>>> If there is no way to turn off the DCB, isn't this code logically
>>> dead? This code is run when "dcb_config == 0" but in that case
>>> 'dcb_test' is already 0.
>>> If so what is the point of the code, can it be removed?
>>>
>> yes. Currently, it is a dead logic unless testpmd adds support for
>> switching from DCB mode to other modes.
>> I think dcb_test is a flag at the packet forwarding layer in testpmd.
>> The original purpose is to indicate that the current forwarding test
>> is being performed in DCB mode.
>
> can 'dcb_config' be sufficient on its own for this? so that we can
> remove 'dcb_test' and simplify the logic.
>
I agree with your proposal. Because the 'dcb_flag' field in struct
rte_port indicates whether the current port is DCB, It is sufficient to
have 'dcb_config' as a global variable to control the DCB test status.
ok,I will send V2 to update all of the previous discussions.
>>> btw, do you know what 'dcb_test' does at all? It seems it is set
>>> when 'dcb_config' set, and reset when 'dcb_config' reset.
>>>
>> In my opinion, it is only a global flag. During a DCB test, DCB must
>> be configured on all forwarding ports.
>>>>>>>>> printf("Stopping ports...\n");
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> RTE_ETH_FOREACH_DEV(pi) {
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> 2.7.4
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Linuxarm mailing list -- linuxarm@openeuler.org To unsubscribe
>>>>>> send an
>>>>>> email to linuxarm-leave@openeuler.org
>>>>>>
>>>
>>> .
>>>
>>
>
> .
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-12 12:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-05 10:22 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] Fixes for testpmd Lijun Ou
2021-03-05 10:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] app/testpmd: fix forwarding configuration when DCB test Lijun Ou
2021-03-23 8:55 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-03-23 14:17 ` oulijun
2021-03-23 14:17 ` oulijun
2021-03-24 1:51 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-04-10 1:12 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-10 2:53 ` oulijun
2021-03-23 14:18 ` oulijun
2021-03-24 2:03 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-03-24 13:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [Linuxarm] " oulijun
2021-03-25 2:21 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-03-27 3:53 ` oulijun
2021-04-10 0:56 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-10 2:58 ` oulijun
2021-04-12 7:52 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-12 12:20 ` oulijun [this message]
2021-03-05 10:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] app/testpmd: remove forwarding config from parsing Rx and Tx Lijun Ou
2021-03-23 7:50 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-03-24 1:00 ` oulijun
2021-03-24 1:44 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-03-25 3:03 ` oulijun
2021-03-29 1:53 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-04-02 1:44 ` oulijun
2021-04-02 2:33 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-04-09 6:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [Linuxarm] " oulijun
2021-04-09 7:08 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-04-10 3:02 ` oulijun
2021-04-12 10:35 ` [dpdk-dev] " Ferruh Yigit
2021-04-12 12:20 ` oulijun
2021-03-05 10:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] app/testpmd: use of Rx/Tx in testpmd Lijun Ou
2021-03-23 3:12 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-03-23 3:17 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-03-23 7:25 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-03-23 7:46 ` Tu, Lijuan
2021-03-23 7:51 ` oulijun
2021-03-23 7:58 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-03-23 10:42 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-03-23 7:59 ` Tu, Lijuan
2021-03-20 1:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] Fixes for testpmd Min Hu (Connor)
2021-04-20 7:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V2 0/7] modifications about DCB forwarding configuration Huisong Li
2021-04-20 7:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V2 1/7] app/testpmd: fix forward lcores number when DCB test Huisong Li
2021-04-27 9:20 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-04-27 13:49 ` Huisong Li
2021-04-28 2:13 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-04-20 7:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V2 2/7] app/testpmd: fix DCB forwarding configuration Huisong Li
2021-04-20 7:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V2 3/7] app/testpmd: fix a segment fault when DCB test Huisong Li
2021-04-20 7:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V2 4/7] app/testpmd: add check for support of reporting DCB info Huisong Li
2021-04-20 7:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V2 5/7] app/testpmd: move position of verifying DCB test Huisong Li
2021-04-20 7:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V2 6/7] app/testpmd: add forwarding config in start port Huisong Li
2021-04-20 7:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V2 7/7] app/testpmd: remove redundant fwd streams initialization Huisong Li
2021-04-20 7:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] Fixes for testpmd Huisong Li
2021-04-20 9:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V3 0/7] modifications about DCB forwarding configuration Huisong Li
2021-04-20 9:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V3 1/7] app/testpmd: fix forward lcores number when DCB test Huisong Li
2021-04-27 10:18 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-04-20 9:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V3 2/7] app/testpmd: fix DCB forwarding configuration Huisong Li
2021-04-27 10:59 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-04-27 14:13 ` Huisong Li
2021-04-20 9:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V3 3/7] app/testpmd: fix a segment fault when DCB test Huisong Li
2021-04-27 11:19 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-04-27 14:10 ` Huisong Li
2021-04-28 2:02 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-04-28 2:26 ` Huisong Li
2021-04-20 9:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V3 4/7] app/testpmd: add check for support of reporting DCB info Huisong Li
2021-04-27 11:26 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-04-20 9:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V3 5/7] app/testpmd: move position of verifying DCB test Huisong Li
2021-04-27 11:33 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-04-20 9:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V3 6/7] app/testpmd: add forwarding config in start port Huisong Li
2021-04-27 11:43 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-04-28 2:14 ` Huisong Li
2021-04-20 9:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V3 7/7] app/testpmd: remove redundant fwd streams initialization Huisong Li
2021-04-27 11:50 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2021-04-28 6:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V4 0/7] modifications about DCB forwarding configuration Huisong Li
2021-04-28 6:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V4 1/7] app/testpmd: fix forward lcores number when DCB test Huisong Li
2021-04-28 6:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V4 2/7] app/testpmd: fix DCB forwarding configuration Huisong Li
2021-04-28 6:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V4 3/7] app/testpmd: fix a segment fault when DCB test Huisong Li
2021-04-28 6:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V4 4/7] app/testpmd: add check for support of reporting DCB info Huisong Li
2021-04-28 6:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V4 5/7] app/testpmd: move position of verifying DCB test Huisong Li
2021-04-28 6:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V4 6/7] app/testpmd: add forwarding configuration when config DCB Huisong Li
2021-04-28 6:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V4 7/7] app/testpmd: remove redundant fwd streams initialization Huisong Li
2021-04-28 7:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V4 0/7] modifications about DCB forwarding configuration Li, Xiaoyun
2021-04-29 16:13 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=089eecab-582b-38d4-c72d-2e1866753150@huawei.com \
--to=oulijun@huawei.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=linuxarm@openeuler.org \
--cc=xiaoyun.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).