DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: raman geetha gopalakrishnan <glowingsun@gmail.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Reg DPDK & PMD
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 14:25:30 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <08e21158-c6bd-d390-8913-033f3f06bb8e@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABAuC=ks2efJLTGAnpuMs47qtvrAtm9eo5DfdHRuDPiTPSr0ag@mail.gmail.com>

On 3/8/2017 1:35 PM, raman geetha gopalakrishnan wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> I have the following basic question. Hope to get an answer / link where i
> can get myself clear.
> 
> 1. In DPDK PMD is optimized driver for an given NIC to get maximum
> performance.
>     That being the case why we are talking about DPDK supported NICs.
> 
>      A) My assumption is that NIC interface is standardized so that PMD
> should actually work with any NIC (barring some NIC specific performance
> tweaks)
>           is that correct?

PMDs (Poll Mode Drivers) are _real_ device drivers, they are not an
optimization layer on top off a standardized interface, they deal
directly with hardware, so needs to be specific to hardware.

> 
>      B) if #A is correct , how can i make changes to PMD to support any NIC
> ?
> 
> if i have to put the above question in different way then it is
> 
> 2. what is preventing us from having a common PMD layer for all NICs and
> additional PMD specific to each NIC???
> 
> Thanks
> Raman
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-03-08 14:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-08 13:35 raman geetha gopalakrishnan
2017-03-08 14:16 ` Bruce Richardson
2017-03-09  3:16   ` raman geetha gopalakrishnan
2017-03-08 14:25 ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2017-03-08 14:37   ` Wiles, Keith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=08e21158-c6bd-d390-8913-033f3f06bb8e@intel.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=glowingsun@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).