From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45B90A0C43; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 17:35:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32133410DB; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 17:35:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6F57410D7 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 17:35:03 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1632843303; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=TA2vGQLjC19/osjXs2Kgeh3uWtLUZ1D5ANftozlaoFk=; b=N9gkOI9/Tr4dhWY7XkRDQM96NAq5z1GAd0AFAhe+3gX0fw62Q36sj2+bcwy2ykGdIt6YHz 3/YkyrliTV2BSKJkLqVluk446S/gDlxDbZ9cbfbqHz4hfHaWdxVUAFc/22PwXPv0tjJfT7 SFbHoqe5kbeVMmsa5tzUNnsK1IxgQzU= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-498-yno06peROiObFRs5tnv1AQ-1; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 11:35:01 -0400 X-MC-Unique: yno06peROiObFRs5tnv1AQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 673A01006AB0; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 15:35:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.39.208.26] (unknown [10.39.208.26]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EFA560C7F; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 15:34:56 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <0995b4af-6a0b-6aa9-020d-c39c04d44c40@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 17:34:54 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.1.0 To: Xuan Ding , dev@dpdk.org, chenbo.xia@intel.com Cc: jiayu.hu@intel.com, cheng1.jiang@intel.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, sunil.pai.g@intel.com, YvonneX.Yang@intel.com References: <20210916032517.75827-1-xuan.ding@intel.com> <20210916043415.82219-1-xuan.ding@intel.com> From: Maxime Coquelin In-Reply-To: <20210916043415.82219-1-xuan.ding@intel.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] vhost: normalize return type and function name X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 9/16/21 06:34, Xuan Ding wrote: > In some function definitions, adjust return type and function name on > a separate line to be consistent with DPDK coding style. > > Signed-off-by: Xuan Ding > --- > v2: > * Fixed one format issue. > --- > lib/vhost/vhost.c | 15 ++++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > Applied to dpdk-next-virtio/main. Thanks, Maxime